Total views : 330

Development of Indian Sign Language Dictionary using Synthetic Animations

Affiliations

  • Department of Computer Science, DAV College, Jalandhar - 144008, Punjab, India
  • Department of Computer Science, Punjabi University, Patiala - 147002, Punjab, India

Abstract


Objective: Development of Indian Sign Language video dictionary is essential in the today’s world of computerization. Though a lot of human video sign language dictionaries are available, we aim to develop the Indian Sign Language dictionary using synthetic animation which uses the computer generated cartoon rather than real human. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Sign Language cannot be spoken or written unlike other languages like English, Punjabi, Hindi, etc. The most commonly used words in Indian Sign Language are categorized and then these words are converted into the sign language writing notation (HamNoSys - Hamburg Notation System). This HamNoSys notation is then converted into SiGML (Signing Gesture Markup Language) using which the synthetic animation (using a computer generated cartoon) of the sign is generated. Findings: The synthetic animations are better as compared to human videos in terms of memory consumption, standardization, and flexibility. Synthetic animations can be modified as per the requirement whereas the human videos cannot be modified. The only drawback that seem is, these synthetic animations may lack the natural non-manual component of sign. Applications/Improvements: The synthetic dictionary created in this work can be used for translation system in which spoken or written sentence can be converted into the sign language animation. The dictionary created can be used to education to hard of hearing people. Display boards can be created for displaying the important messages in Indian sign language at the public gathering.

Keywords

HamNoSys, Machine Translation System, Natural Language Processing, Sign Language, SiGML.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 636)

References


  • SIL International, Ethnologue, Languages of the World. Available from: http://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/
  • Zeshan U, Madan M, Vasishta M, Sethna M. Implementation of Indian sign language in educational settings. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2004 Nov; 15(2):15–35.
  • Haualand H, Allen C. Deaf people and human rights. World Federation of the Deaf and the Swedish National Association of the Deaf; 2009 Jan. p. 1–71.
  • Census of India. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population_enumeration.aspx
  • Stokoe WC. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2005; 10(1):3–37.
  • Zeshan U, Vasishta M, Sethna M. Implementation of Indian sign language in educational settings. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2005; 16(1):16–40.
  • Vasishta M, Woodward J, DeSantis S. An introduction to Indian sign language. All India Federation of the Deaf. 3rd ed; 1998.
  • Dasgupta T, Shukla S, Kumar S, Diwakar S, Basu A. A multilingual multimedia Indian sign language dictionary tool. The 6th Workshop on Asian Language Resources; 2008. p. 57–64.
  • FDMSE-Indian SIGN LANGUAGE. Available from: http://enabled.in/wp/indian-sign-language-dictionary-website/
  • European sign language center. Available from: http://efsli.org/
  • Handspeak. Available from: https://prezi.com/fugytefvya6z/httpwwwhandspeakcomwordwwhomp4/
  • VCOM3D. Sign smith products. Available from: http://www.vcom3d.com
  • Wilcox S, Scheibman J, Wood D, Cokely D, Stokoe WC. Multimedia dictionary of American sign language. Proceedings of the 1st Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies; New York, USA: ACM Press. 1994. p. 9–16.
  • Hanke T. HamNoSys-representing sign language data in language resources and language processing contexts. LREC 2004, Workshop Proceedings: Representation and Processing of Sign Languages. Paris: ELRA. 2004. p. 1–6.
  • Kennaway R. Synthetic animation of deaf signing gestures. Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction; 2001 Apr. p. 149–57.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.