Total views : 629

Towards a Model for Studying Social Media Adoption for the Co-Creation Services Domain


  • Department of Advanced Informatics School, Universiti Technology Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


Objectives: Recently, many types of businesses have adopted various social media platforms as fundamental components to conduct their processes with customers. The success of any business through social media depends on the level of customer acceptance. Customers’ intention to participate in social media presents a significant area for research. Thus, the objective of this paper is to develop an effective model that can be used to explain the factors affecting customer participation in social media for co-creation services. Methods: This study includes a critical literature review of the following popular acceptance theories: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), as well as social media acceptance studies. Findings: The literature review indicates that while numerous technology acceptance studies have used and extended TAM to other constructs, few have extended it to the experience that customers expect to gain from their participation. To fill this gap, the proposed model builds on TAM and extends it using relevant appropriate constructs, such as social influence and customer experience (hedonic value, social integrative value and customer learning value). Improvements/Applications: The information generated by this study may be useful to future studies in the area of acceptance technology. The present research is among the few works examining social media acceptance for co-creation services.


Co-Creation, Customer Experience, Social Media, Social Influence, TAM.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 428)


  • Goh K, Heng C, Lin Z. Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Information Systems Research. 2013 Jan; 24(1):88–107.
  • Consumers engaged via social media are more likely to buy, recommend. Available from:
  • Nambisan S, Baron R. Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2009 Jul; 26(4):388–406.
  • Reay P, Seddighi H. An empirical evaluation of management and operational capabilities for innovation via co‐creation. Euro Journal of Innovation Mnagmnt. 2012 Apr; 15(2):259–75.
  • Piller F, Ihl C, Vossen A. A typology of customer co-creation in the innovation process. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2010 Dec; 1–26.
  • Hanson C, West J, Neiger B, Thackeray R, Barnes M, McIntyre E. Use and acceptance of social media among health educators. American Journal of Health Education. 2011 Jul-Aug; 42(4):197–204.
  • Park S. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2009; 12(3):150–62.‏
  • Rauniar R, Rawski G, Yang J, Johnson B. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2014 Feb; 27(1):6–30.
  • Zhang H, Lu Y, Wang B, Wu S. The impacts of technological environments and co-creation experiences on customer participation. Information and Management. 2015; 52(4):468–82.
  • Zwass V. Co-creation: Toward taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2010 Oct; 15(1):11–48.‏
  • Kohler T, Fueller J, Matzler K, Stieger D. Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly. 2011 Sep; 35(3):773–88.‏
  • Füller J. Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review. 2010; 52(2):98–122.
  • Roberts D, Hughes M, Kertbo K. Exploring consumers motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activities. European Journal of Marketing. 2014 Feb; 48(1/2):147–69.‏
  • Ajzen I, Martin F. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003 Sep; 27(3):425–78.
  • Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Springer, Heidelberg; 1985. p. 11–39.
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991 Dec; 50(2):179–211.
  • Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research. 1995 Jun; 6(2):144–76.‏
  • Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989 Sep; 13(3):319–40.
  • Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2003 Dec; 12:1–31.‏
  • Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 2000 Feb; 46(2):186–204.
  • Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences. 2008 May; 39(2):273–315.‏‏
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly. 2000 Mar; 24(1):115–39.‏
  • Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly. 2012 Feb; 36(1):157–78.‏
  • Braun M. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013 May; 29(3):673–80.
  • Chang Y, Zhu D. Understanding social networking sites adoption in China: A comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption. Computers in Human Behaviour. 2011 Sep; 27(5):1840–8.‏
  • Chang Y, Yang C. Why do we blog? From the perspectives of technology acceptance and media choice factors. Behaviour and Information Technology. 2012 Apr; 32(4):371–86.
  • Gruzd A, Staves K, Wilk A. Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012 Nov; 28(6):2340–50.
  • Escobar-Rodríguez T, Carvajal-Trujillo E, Monge-Lozano P. Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of Facebook as a learning tool: An extension of the UTAUT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2014 May; 30(2):136–51.
  • Hsu C, Lin J. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information and Management. 2008 Jan; 45(1):65–74.‏
  • Casalo L, Flavian C, Guinaliu M. Determinants of the intention to participate in firm-hosted online travel communities and effects on consumer behavioral intentions. Tourism Management. 2010 Dec; 31(6):898–911.
  • Hossain L, de Silva A. Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks. Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2009 Mar; 20(1):1–18.
  • Kwon O, Wen Y. An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010 Mar; 26(2):254–63.
  • Casalo L, Carlos F, Guinaliu M. Understanding the intention to follow the advice obtained in an online travel community. Computers in Human Behavior. 2011 Mar; 27(2):622–33.
  • Hsu C, Lu H. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management. 2004 Sep; 41(7):853–68.
  • Deutsch M, Gerard H. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1955 Nov; 51(3):629–36.‏
  • Kelman H. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1958 Mar; 2(1):51–60.
  • Wang S, Lin C. The effect of social influence on bloggers’ usage intention. Online Information Review. 2011; 35(1):50–65.‏
  • Al-Qeisi K. Analyzing the use of UTAUT model in explaining an online behaviour: Internet banking adoption [Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University Brunel Business School PhD Theses]. 2009 Mar. p. 1–360.
  • Chen I, Chen N, Kinshuk. Examining the factors influencing participants’ knowledge sharing behaviour in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology and Society. 2009 Jan; 12(1):134–48.
  • Kuo F, Young M. A study of the intention-action gap in knowledge sharing practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008 Jun; 59(8):1224–37.
  • Chung J, Buhalis D. A study of online travel community and Web 2.0: Factors affecting participation and attitude. Proceedings ENTER. Springer-Verlag Wien, Innsbruck; 2008. p. 267–78.
  • Yoo J, Choi S, Choi M, Rho J. Why people use Twitter: Social conformity and social value perspectives. Online Information Review. 2014; 38(2):265–83.
  • Raghunathan R, Corfman K. Is happiness shared doubled and sadness shared halved? Social influence on enjoyment of hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research. 2006 Aug; 43(3):386–94.
  • Lu J, Yao J, Yu C. Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2005 Sep; 14(3):245–68.
  • Venkatesh V, Speier C, Morris M. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences. 2002 Mar; 33(2):297–316.
  • Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly. 2000 Dec; 24(4):665–94.
  • Fagan M, Neill S, Wooldridge B. Exploring the intention to use computers: An empirical investigation of the role of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2008; 48(3):31–7.
  • Ha S, Stoel L. Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of Business Research. 2009 May; 62(5):565–71.
  • Turel O, Serenko A, Giles P. Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of online auction users. Mis Quarterly. 2011 Dec; 35(4):1043–61.
  • Nosko A, Wood E, Molema S. All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010 May; 26(3):406–18.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.