Total views : 384

Factors that Facilitate Systematic Problems Solving Process in Small and Medium Enterprises


  • Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia


Background/Objectives: Generating innovative services are not just related to analyzing the customer and market needs, or applying the systematic innovation process, but it is also related to other key success factors that can lead to the success of innovation. This theoretical study focused on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) performance during implementing systematic innovation analysis method, such as TRIZ- theory of inventive problem solving, in solving service problems. Methods Analysis: This paper reviewed the results from previous studies and highlighted important factors in facilitating the systematic problems solving process, and integrating the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) solution with the ultimate process outcome. Findings: The results of this paper emphasized on the two aspects for promoting the process. First aspect refers to necessary factors such as innovation champion and/or innovation team, important customer needs, create value, and organizational alignment for providing successful innovative services. The second aspect refers to individual, environmental, organizational, and technological factors which influencing the ICT integration with the process outcomes. Improvements/Applications: Taking in considering external and internal factors that may affect using systematic innovation analysis assists SMEs to find platforms to develop and improve their work.


Information and Communications Technology (ICT), Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs), Systematic Innovation, TRIZ.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 299)


  • Muhammad MZ. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Competing in the Global Business Environment: A Case of Malaysia. International Business Research. 2010 Jan; 3(1):66–75.
  • Bayarcelik EB, Tasel F, Apak S. A Research on determining innovation factors for SMEs. 10th International Strategic Management Conference. 2014 Sep, 150, p.202-211.
  • Product and Service Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Date Accessed; 20/09/2006.
  • Tektas A. ICT capability and innovation utilization in Turkish SMEs: The case of machinery industry. Communications of the IBIMA. 2008; 5(6):34-41.
  • Dadfar H. Linkage between organisational innovation capability, product platform development and performance: The case of pharmaceutical small and medium enterprises in Iran. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2013 Jun; 24(8):819-34.
  • Altshuller GS. Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution Inventive Problems. 1st edn. New York: Gordon and Breach Science, 1984.
  • Bajwa PS, Mahto D. Concepts, Tools and techniques of problem solving through TRIZ: A review. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2013 Jul; 2(7):1-13.
  • Chai KH, Zhang J, Tan KC. A TRIZ-based method for new service design. Journal of Service Research. 2005 Aug; 8(1):48-66.
  • Lin CS, Su CT. An Innovative way to create new services: applying the TRIZ methodology. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers. 2007; 24(2):142-52.
  • Kim S, Park Y. A TRIZ-based approach to generation of service-supporting product concepts. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology. 2012; 6(2):487-90.
  • Mann D. Hands on Systematic Innovation: For Business and Management. 1st end. UK: Edward Gaskell Publishers, 2007.
  • Triz PDF - Ebookinga. Date Accessed: 5/05/2013.
  • Gazem N, Rahman AA. Matrix for mapping ICT roles in small and medium enterprises with TRIZ inventive principles based on redesign service types. Journal Teknologi. 2015; 73(2):67–75.
  • Van de Vrande V. Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation. 2009; 29(6–7):423-37.
  • Uden L, Naaranoja M. Service innovation by SME. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology. 2009 Jan; 5(3):268-94.
  • Warren A, Susman D. Review of Innovation Practices in Small Manufacturing Companies. Prepared for National Institute of Standards and Technology United States Department of Commerce, 2002.
  • Karpak B, Topcu I. Small medium manufacturing enterprises in Turkey: An analytic network process framework for prioritizing factors affecting success. International Journal of Production Economics. 2010 May; 125(1):60-70.
  • Talebi K, Ghavamipour M, Irandust A. Innovation in Iran’s small and medium size enterprises (SMEs): Prioritize influence factors affecting innovation of SMEs, using Analytic Network Process (ANP) method. African Journal of Business Management. 2012 Oct; 6(43):10775-85.
  • Wennekers S, Thurik R. Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Small Business Economics. 1999 Aug; 13(1):27-56.
  • SRI International. Date Accessed: 20/07/2016.
  • Goktan AB. The Role of Strategy in The Innovation Process: A stage approach University of North Texas, 2005.
  • Noordin A, Hasnan N, Osman NH. Six main innovation issues: A case of service innovation of postal and courier services in Malaysia. Journal of Technology Management and Business. 2014; 1(1):73-82.
  • Walter A. Championship behaviors and innovations success: an empirical investigation of university spin-offs. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2011 Jul; 28(4):586-98.
  • Howell JM. The right stuff: identifying and developing effective champions of innovation. The Academy of Management Executive. 2005 May; 19(2):108-19.
  • Park SM, Yang HK. Analysis of structural relationships among predictors of collective-creativity in communities of convergence. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Jun; 9(24):1-11.
  • Hogan SJ, Coote LV. Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of schein's model. Journal of Business Research. 2014 Aug; 67(8):1609-21.
  • Kotelnikov V. Small and medium enterprises and ICT. United Nations Development Programme – Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) and Asian and Pacific Training Centre for Information and Communication Technology for Development (APCICT). 2007, p.1-27.
  • Hazbo S. ICT adoption policy of Australian and Croatian SMEs. Managing Global Transitions. 2006; 4(1):25-40.
  • Premkumar G, Roberts M. Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega. 1999 Aug; 27(4):467-84.
  • Riccardo L, Alessandro S. The adoption of ICT among SMEs: evidence from an Italian survey. Small Business Economics. 2004 Sep; 23(2):151-68.
  • Alam SS, Noor MKM. ICT adoption in small and medium enterprises: an empirical evidence of service sectors in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management. 2009 Feb; 4(2):112-25.
  • Abdullah NH, Wahab E, Shamsuddin A. Exploring the Common Technology Adoption Enablers among Malaysian SMEs: Qualitative Findings. Journal of Management and Sustainability. 2013; 3(4):78-91.
  • Kuan KKY, Chau PYK. A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information and Management. 2001 Oct; 38(8):507-21.
  • Tan KS, Eze UC, Chong SC. Effects of industry type on ICT adoption among Malaysian SMEs. Supply Chain and Customer Relationship Management. 2012; 2012:1-12.
  • 40 Inventive (business) principles with examples. Accessed: 1/04/1997.
  • 40 inventive principles in quality management. Date Accessed: 1/09/2009.
  • Regazzoni D. Integration of TRIZ Problem Solving Tools in a Product-Service Engineering Process: The Philosopher's Stone for Sustainability. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2012, p. 399-404.
  • TRIZ-based innovation principles and a process for problem solving in business and management. Accessed: 16/12/2001.
  • Ilevbare IM, Probert D, Phaal R. A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation. 2013 Feb –Mar; 33(2–3):30-37.
  • Zhang J. Systematic Innovation in Service Design through TRIZ, In: Industrial and Systems Engineering National University of Singapore, 2004.
  • Frost FA. The use of strategic tools by small and medium-sized enterprises: an Australasian study. Strategic Change. 2003 Jan-Feb; 12(1):49-62.
  • Zhang J, Chai KH, Tan KC. 40 Inventive Principles with Applications in Service Operations Management. The TRIZ Journal. 2003; 1-16.
  • Gazem NAJ, Rahman AA. Redesign services using inventive principles: a case study. Journal of Research and Innovation in Information Systems. 2012; 128-32.
  • Low RQ, Baharudin AS, Lim SC. The organizational factors that influence the adoption of problem solving tools in Malaysia small and medium enterprises. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Mar; 9(10):1-7.
  • Innovative Service Design Workbook Five Step Process and TRIZ Tools for Service Designers. .Date Accessed: 16/11/2012.
  • Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 4 Edition New York: The Free Press, 1995.
  • Kaminski J. Diffusion of Innovation Theory: Theory in nursing informatics. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics. 2011 Jun; 6(2):1-6.
  • Chakrabarti AK. The role of champion in product innovation. California Management Review. 1974; 17(2):58-63.
  • Battisti G. Inter and Intra firm diffusion of ICT in the United Kingdom (UK) and Switzerland (CH) an internationally comparative study based on firm-level data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2007 Oct; 16(8):669-87.
  • Al-Qirim N. The adoption of eCommerce communications and applications technologies in small businesses in New Zealand. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2007 Dec; 6(4):462-73.
  • Oliveira T, Martins MF. Firms patterns of e-business adoption: evidence for the European Union-27. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation. 2010; 13(1):47-56.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.