Total views : 216

Normative Type of Personality and Mental Matrix of Social Behavior in Russian Society

Affiliations

  • Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

Abstract


Objectives: In modern Russia there is a necessity to articulate, within a framework of national development, the “responses” to the “challenges” of globalization. Methods: New opportunities for studying normative personality in Russia are suggested by conceptual thinking focused on the comprehensive perception of social reality and on “grasping” senses in the most difficult cases of its comprehension. Mental matrix of “political man” in Russian society is verified through the results of modern sociological reviews of the population, particularly, through the answers of those respondents who abide by the conservative model of social behavior. Findings: Interdisciplinary scientific investigations provide a comprehensive idea about the normative type of personality in Russia making use of the concept of “political man” (“homo politicus”). Specific features of “political man” as a normative type of personality are represented by the fact that in his mental matrix such basic values as state, power, order, authority, “following the crowd”, justice represent the modalities which precondition the specifics of social behavior in Russian society. Within the mental program that stipulates peculiar features of social behavior of individuals in the community it is possible to distinguish cognitive, axiological and connotative structures of reflexive and diversifying and of non-reflexive and stable nature. Applications/Improvements: The study reconstructs the comprehensive image of normative personality in Russia and analyzes the specifics of its mental matrix. This would facilitate understanding social behavior and help developing control mechanisms.

Keywords

Authoritarianism, “Homo Politicus”, Mental Matrix, Mental Program, Normative Type of Personality, Paternalism, “Political Man”, Social Behavior, Statism.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 219)

References


  • Hall S, Held D, Hubert D, Thompson K. Modernity: An introduction to modern societies. Wiley-Blackwell Publishers; 1995. p. 618–28.
  • Robertson R, Knondker H. Discourses of globalization: Preliminary considerations. International Sociology. 1999; 13(1):25–40.
  • Huntington S. Who are we? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2004.
  • Goldschmidt P. Europe's identity crisis. The New York Times; 2010 Feb 5.
  • Ariely G. Globalization and the decline of national identity? An exploration across sixty-three countries. Nations and Nationalism. 2012; 18(3):461–82.
  • Shvets AV, Basic personality in Russia: Socio-philosophical study. [PhD thesis]. Rostov-on-Don; 2006.
  • Richmond Y. From Nyet to Da: Understanding the New Russia. Boston: Intercultural Press; 2009.
  • Kantor VK. Personality and power in Russia: Creation of catastrophe. Issues of Philosophy. 1998; 7:16–9.
  • Yakovenko IG. Mechanism of normalization of cultural values, their conflict in the situation of today. ESM. 2002. 2016. Available from: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/text/19185325/
  • Fedotova VG, Modernizing “the other” Europe. Moscow: IFRAN; 1997.
  • Billington JH. The Icon and the Axe: An interpretive history of Russian Culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1966.
  • Neschadin AA, Gorin NI. Destiny of Russia in modern civilization. Moscow: “Informart” Agency; 2003.
  • Khrenov NA, Culture in the era of social chaos. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 2002.
  • Kasyanova KA. On Russian national character. Moscow: Institute National Economy Model; 1994.
  • Schubart W. Europa und die Seele des Ostens. Luzern: VitaNova; 1947.
  • Kara-Murza SG. Russia and West: Paradigms of civilizations. Moscow: Academic Project Culture; 2011. p. 5–34.
  • Andreyev AP, Selivanov AI. Western individualism and Russian tradition. Philosophy and Society; 2001. p. 98–126.
  • Benedict R. Patterns of culture. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1934.
  • Kardiner A. The concept of basic personality structure as an operational tool in the social sciences. The science of man in the World crisis. New York: Columbia Univ Press; 1945.
  • Honigman JJ. Culture and Personality. New York: Harper; 1954.
  • Hsu FLK, Aspects of culture and personality. New York: Abelard-Schuman; 1954.
  • Hallowell AI. Culture and experience. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1955.
  • Mead M. National character and the science of anthropology. Culture and Social Character; 1961. p. 4.
  • Benedict R. Patterns of Culture. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1934.
  • Linton R. The cultural background of personality. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1945.
  • Kon IS. Discovering “Me”. Moscow, Politizdat; 1978.
  • Volkov YuG, Mostovaya IV. Sociology. Moscow: Gardarika; 1998.
  • Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 2001.
  • Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Unit 2. Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Subunit 1. Conceptual Issues in Psychology and Culture. 2011; 8:8. 2016. Available from: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=orpc
  • Thomas WI, Thomas DS. The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1928.
  • Lipset SM. Political Man: The social bases of politics. N.Y: Publisher Garden City; 1960.
  • Ilyin VV, Panarin AS, Badovskiy DV. Political anthropology. Moscow: Moscow State University; 1995.
  • Stradze AE, Kasyanov VV, Kumykov AM, Kirik VA. Structural activity aspect of social activity in Russian Society. IJST. 2016; 9(5). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i5/87625.
  • Lubskiy RA. State and the models of social behavior in modern Russia. Scientific Thought of Caucasus. 2014; 1:39.
  • Lubskiy AV, Lubskiy RA. Man in Russia and in West: Concepts of discursive thinking. Scientific thought of Caucasus. 2012; 4:27–37.
  • Russian people on freedom, democracy and state. Levada-Center. 2013. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/25-09-2013/rossiyane-o-svobode-demokratii-gosudarstve
  • Interest in politics. Levada-Center. 2013. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/16-12-2013/interes-k-politike
  • Participation in political life. Levada-Center. 2013. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/24-09-2013/uchastie-v-politicheskoi-zhizni
  • Protest sentiments of Russian people. Levada-Center. 2013. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/24-09-2013/protestnye-nastroeniya-rossiyan
  • Russian people on freedom, democracy and state. Levada-Center. 2013. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/25-09-2013/rossiyane-o-svobode-demokratii-gosudarstve
  • What Russian people count on and hope for. Levada-Center. 2013. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/25-10-2011/na-chto-rasschityvayut-i-na-kogo-nadeyutsya-rossiyane
  • Russian people on state property and industry. Levada-Center. 2011. 2016. Available from: http://www.levada.ru/30-11-2011/rossiyane-o-gosudarstvennoi-sobstvennosti-i-promyshlennosti

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.