Total views : 264

Simulating Heat Load of a Cryogenic Fuel Tank of a Spent Launcher Orbiter to Evaluate Explosive Rupture

Affiliations

  • Aircraft and Rocket Engineering Department of the Omsk State Technical University, Omsk, Russian Federation

Abstract


Background/Objectives: The research deals with an engineering practice for evaluating explosive rupture of a cryogenic fuel tank of a spent orbital launcher stage after turning off a liquid propellant propulsion engine on a circular orbit in an altitude range of 200 to 1,000 km. Methods: It is assumed that non-used liquid cryogenic fuel component residue in the fuel tank evaporates as a result of such fuel tank structure affected by outer space factors; at the same time vapor pressure of this fuel component raises to the values that exceed structural integrity of the fuel tank. The outer space factors imply heat effect on the spent stage when it is in orbital movement (direct solar radiation, solar radiation that is reflected from the Earth, Earth self-radiation and aerodynamic heat flow). Findings: The engineering practice was developed to evaluate explosive rupture of a cryogenic fuel tank of a spent launcher orbiter on a circular orbit in an altitude range of 200 to 1,000 km. According to our calculations, average absorbed specific heat flow rates at the highest heat load (the fuel tank surface is exposed to cumulative direct solar radiation, re-reflected solar radiation, the Earth self-radiation and aerodynamic heat flow on the whole orbit) and the lowest heat load (the fuel tank surface of the spent stage is in the Earth shadow) were determined. The availability of liquid oxygen residues in the fuel tank of the Zenith launcher in the amount up to 3% of the initial amount filled does not facilitate the explosion. Application/Improvements: The proposed procedure can be refined with regard to fuel strength model and heat exchange processes.

Keywords

Circular Orbit, Explosive Rupture, Fuel Residues, Heat Load, Launcher, Spent Stage.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 204)

References


  • Mannan S. Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries. Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control. Vol.1, third edition, Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford; 2004.
  • Chen S, Sun J, Chu G. Small scale experiments on boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions: vessel over-pressure. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2007; 20(1):45–51.
  • Kozlitin AM. Development of the theory and methods of quantitative estimation of risk of accident of complex technical systems. Bulletin of the Saratov State Technical University. 2011; 4, 3(61):115–24.
  • Update of the IADC space debris mitigation guidelines. IADC-11-02. Beijing; 2014 May.
  • Li W, Zhang X, Kou H, Wang R, Fang D. Theoretical prediction of temperature dependent yield strength for metallic materials. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2016; 105:273–8.
  • Takase K et al. Demonstration for upper stage controlled re-entry experiment by H-IIB launch vehicle. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review. 2014; 48(4):11–16.
  • Ariane-5, data relating to flight VA205 [Internet]. 2012. [Cited 2015 Dec 11]. Available from: http://www.space-airbusds.com/media/document/flight-va205_atv3.pdf.
  • Report by the Secretariat. Steps taken by space agencies for reducing the growth or damage potential of space debris. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space [Internet]. 1995 Nov 21. [Cited 2016 Jan 15]. Available from: http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/reports/ac105/AC105_620R.pdf.
  • Report by the Secretariat. Steps taken by space agencies for reducing the growth or damage potential of space debris. Committee on the peaceful uses of outer space [Internet]. 1996 Dec 13. [Cited 2016 Jan 22]. Available from: http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/reports/ac105/AC105_663R.pdf.
  • Glazunov AA, Goldin VD, Zverev VG, Ustinov SN, Finchenko VS. Aerothermodynamics calculation of thermal destruction of “Fregat” upper stage at descent in the Earth's atmosphere. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics. 2013; 20(2):195–209.
  • Sim H, Kim K. Reentry survival analysis of tumbling metallic hollow cylinder. Advances in Space Research. 2011; 48(5):914–22.
  • Tewari A. Entry trajectory model with thermomechanical breakup. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 2009; 46(2):299–306.
  • Ailor WH, Patera RP. Spacecraft re-entry strategies: meeting debris mitigation and ground safety requirements. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2007; 221(6):947–53.
  • Rykhlova LV, Bagrov AV, Barabanov SI, Kasimenko TV, Mikisha AM, Smirnov MA. Search and observations of space debris and near earth objects at Inasan. Advances in Space Research. 2001; 28(9):1301–7.
  • Fritsche B, Klinkrad H, Kashkovsky A, Grinberg E. Spacecraft disintegration during uncontrolled atmospheric re-entry. Acta Astronautica. 2000; 47(2–9):513–22.
  • Lips T, Fritsche B. A comparison of commonly used re-entry analysis tools. Acta Astronautica. 2005; 57(2–8):312–23.
  • Rykhlova LV, Kasimenko TV, Mikisha AM, Smirnov MA. Explosions in the geostationary orbit. Advances in Space Research. 1997; 19(2):313–19.
  • Lips T, Fritsche B, Koppenwallner G, Klinkrad H. Spacecraft destruction during re-entry – latest results and development of the SCARAB software system. Advances in Space Research. 2004; 34(5):1055–60.
  • Fridlyander IN. Mechanical engineering: Encyclopedia. Vol. II-3. Non Ferrous metals and alloys. Compositional metallic materials. Mashinostroyeniye Publishing House: Moscow; 2001.
  • Goldenveyzer AL. Theory of thin elastic shells. Nauka Publishing House: Moscow; 1976.
  • Baker WE, Cox PA, Westine PS, Kulesz JJ, Strehlow RA. Explosion hazards and evaluation. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam – Oxford – New York; 1983.
  • Guide to the analysis of danger of emergency explosions and determination of parameters of mechanical action. (RBG-05-039-96). STC of YaRB Gosatomnadzor of Russia: Moscow; 2000.
  • Bubbico R, Mazzarotta B. Analysis and comparison of calculation methods for physical explosions of compressed gases. 11th International Conference on Chemical and Process Engineering. 2013; 32:81–90.
  • Viktorov MM. Methods of calculation of physical and chemical quantities measurement and calculations applied. Khimiya Publishing House: Leningrad; 1977.
  • Reid R, Prausnitz J, Sherwood T. The properties of gases and liquids. Leningrad; 1982.
  • Leontyev AI. Theory of heat and mass transfer. Vysshaya Shkola: Moscow; 1979.
  • Rahimi P, Ward Ch A. Kinetics of evaporation: satistical rate theory approach. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2005; 8(1):1–14.
  • Meseguer J, Perez-Grande I, Sanz-Andres A. Spacecraft thermal control. Woodhead Publishing: Oxford – Cambridge – Philadelphia – New Delhi; 2012.
  • Sklyarov YuA, Fomina NV, Kotuma AI, Semenova NV. Albedo, absorbed solar radiation and outgoing longwave radiation derived from data of NASA atlases. Bulletin of the Saratov University. 2009; 1:44–55.
  • Narimanov GS. Fundamentals of space vehicles a flight theory. Mashinostroyeniye Publishing House: Moscow; 1972.
  • NASA-STD-8719.14A NASA Technical standard, process for limiting orbital debris, NASA, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington, D.C; 2012. p. 1–74.
  • Lochan R, Adimurthy V, Kumar K. Separation dynamics of ullage rockets. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 1994; 17(3):426–34.
  • Jeyakumar D, Biswas KK, Nageswara-Rao B. Stage separation dynamic analysis of upper stage of a multistage launch vehicle using retro rockets. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2005; 41(8–9):849–66.
  • Alessi EM. The reentry to earth as a valuable option at the end-of-life of libration point orbit missions. Advances in Space Research. 2015; 55(12):2914–30.
  • Informational an analytical report. The multichannel a monitoring telescope MMT. The results of the analysis of telemetry data on space objects in near-Earth orbits [Internet]. 2016 Jan. [Cited 2016 Feb 03]. Available from: http://astroguard.ru/mmt_public.html.
  • Anselmo L, Pardini C. Ranking upper stages in low earth orbit for active removal. Acta Astronautica. 2016; 122:19–27.
  • Kumar KJJ. Heat transfer analysis of light weight cryogenic tank for space vehicles. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(4). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i4/62291.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.