Total views : 387

### Error Analysis of Heat Conduction Partial Differential Equations using Galerkin’s Finite Element Method

#### Affiliations

• Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Malaysia
• Department of Science and Engineering, International Islamic University, Malaysia

#### Abstract

The present work explores an error analysis of Galerkin finite element method (GFEM) for computing steady heat conduction in order to show its convergence and accuracy. The steady state heat distribution in a planar region is modeled by two-dimensional Laplace partial differential equations. A simple three-node triangular finite element model is used and its derivation to form elemental stiffness matrix for unstructured and structured grid meshes is presented. The error analysis is performed by comparison with analytical solution where the difference with the analytical result is represented in the form of three vector norms. The error analysis for the present GFEM for structured grid mesh is tested on heat conduction problem of a rectangular domain with asymmetric and mixed natural-essential boundary conditions. The accuracy and convergence of the numerical solution is demonstrated by increasing the number of elements or decreasing the size of each element covering the domain. It is found that the numerical result converge to the exact solution with the convergence rates of almost O(h²) in the Euclidean L2 norm, O(h²) in the discrete perpetuity L∞norm and O(h1) in the H1 norm.

#### Keywords

Error Analysis, Finite Element Method, Galerkin’s Weight Residual Approach, Heat Conduction, Laplace Equation, Partial Differential Equation.

#### Full Text:

|  (PDF views: 335)

#### References

• Reddy JN. An introduction to the finite element method. 3rd edn, McGraw Hill International Edition; 2006.
• Hoffman JD. Numerical methods for engineers and scientists. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2006.
• Antonopoulou DC, Plexousaki M. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for the linear Schrödinger equation in non-cylindrical domains. Numerische Mathematik. 2010; 115(4):585–608.
• Manas KD, Babuska IM, Oden JT. Solution of stochastic partial differential equations using Galerkin finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2001; 190:6359–72.
• Kreyszig E. Advanced engineering mathematics. 10th edn, John Wiley & Sons: New York; 2011.
• Schotzau D, Schwab C. Time discretization of parabolic problems by the HP-version of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 2000; 38(3):837–75.
• Richter T, Vexler B. Efficient numerical realization of discontinuous Galerkin methods for temporal discretization of parabolic problems. Numerische Mathematik. 2013 May; 124(1):151–82
• Li D, Zhang C. Error estimates of discontinuous Galerkin methods for delay differential equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics. 2014; 82:1–10.
• Gil S, Saleta ME, Tobia. Experimental study of the Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions in two-dimensional electrostatic problems. American Journal of Physics. 2002 Nov; 70(12):1208–13.
• Burden RL, Faires JD. Numerical Analysis. 7th ed., Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2001.
• Gockenbach SM. Partial differential equations, analytical and numerical methods, The Society for Industrial and applied Mathematics, United States; 2002.
• Kwo YW, Bang H. The finite element method using Matlab. CRC Press, Boca Raton London, New York Washington: D.C; 2000.
• Gerald CF, Wheatly PO. Applied numerical analysis, 6th Ed, Pearson Education (Singapore) Pte. Ltd; 2005.
• Ainsworth M, Oden JT. A posterior error estimation in finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.1997 Mar; 142(1–2):1–88.
• Yi L. An -error Estimate for the h-p version continuous Petrov-Galerkin method for nonlinear initial value problems. East Asian Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2015 Nov; 5(4):301–11.
• He X, Lin T, Lin Y. Interior penalty bilinear IFE discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficient. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity. 2010 Jul; 23(3):467–83.

### Refbacks

• There are currently no refbacks.