Total views : 425

The Role of Regional Higher Education Institutions in Creating Conditions for People with Disabilities in Inclusive Educational Environment of the Russian Federation


  • Cherepovets State University, Disability Resource Center for Students and Staff Working with this Category of People, Cherepovets, Vologda Region, Russian Federation


Background: This article analyzes the problems concerning creation of conditions for inclusive education for people with disabilities, and Russia’s readiness and preparedness to implement the government initiatives. Methods: Analyzing and discussing the existing problems, the authors present an overview of the normative and scientific contexts of inclusive education in the region offering a generalization of their own experience in engaging the University in solving the problems of education accessibility for people with limited health. Findings: In general, the existing experience and its analysis allow stating that higher education has considerable potential to improve regional system of assistance for children with disabilities and complete satisfaction of their special educational needs. Singling out the determinants of the regional policy in creating legal and organizational support, we can distinguish key aspects in the state guarantees and protection of the inclusive education implementation that are expected from higher education institutions. The university is mainly responsible for special and inclusive education teacher training in the fields of teaching Bachelor's and Master's programs and also in the system of additional vocational training. Higher education has the potential to improve regional systems of educational assistance for children with disabilities and to meet and satisfy their special educational needs. Improvements: Dedicated problems require a broad interdepartmental interaction and discussion. It is necessary to involve not only the regional authorities, but also the federal government to solve these problems.


Higher Educational Institution, Inclusive Education, People with Disabilities.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 254)


  • Hoffman EM. Relationships between inclusion teachers and their students: Perspectives from a middle school [PhD thesis in special education]. Indiana University; 2011.
  • Jackson R. Inclusion or segregation for children with an intellectual impairment: What does the research say? Edith Cowan University; 2008. Available from:
  • Jones Ph. My peers have also been an inspiration for me: Developing online learning opportunities to support teacher engagement with inclusive pedagogy for students with severe/profound intellectual developmental disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2010; 14(7):681–96.
  • Koster M, Timmerman ME, Nakken H, Pijl SJ, van Houten EJ. Evaluating social participation of pupils with special needs in regular primary schools. Examination of a teacher questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2009; 25(4):213–22.
  • Mattson E-H, Hansen A-M. Inclusive and exclusive education in Sweden: Principals’ opinions and experiences. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2009; 24(4):465–72. DOI: 10.1080/08856250903223112.
  • Renzaglia A. The impact of teacher education on the beliefs, attitudes, and dispositions of preservice special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education. 1997; (20):360–77.
  • Ryndak DL. Defining school inclusion for students with moderate to severe disabilities: What do experts say? Exceptionality. 2000; 8(2):101–16.
  • Sander A. Konzepte einer inclusiven padagogik. Zeitschrift ffir Heilpadagogik. 2004; 5:240–4. [in German].
  • Shemesh YR. A survey of teachers' perceptions of administrative support and their attitudes toward inclusion in New Jersey. New Brunswick, New Jersey; 2009.
  • Voltz DL. What matters most in inclusive education: A practical guide for moving forward. Intervention in School and Clinic. 2001; 37(1):23–30. DOI: 10.1177/105345120103700105.
  • York J. Feedback about integrating middle-school students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Exceptional Children. 1991; 58(3):244–58.
  • Hardiman Sh, Guerin S, Fitzsimons E. A comparison of the social competence of children with moderate intellectual disability in inclusive versus segregated school settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2009; 30(2):397–407. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.07.006.
  • Wendelborg С, Tossebro J. Educational arrangements and social participation with peers amongst children with disabilities in regular schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011; 15(5):497–512. DOI: 10.1080/13603110903131739.
  • Cagran B, Schmidt M. Attitudes of Slovene teachers towards the inclusion of pupils with different types of special needs in primary school. Educational Studies. 2011; 37(2): 171–95. DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2010.506319.
  • Bond R, Castagnera E. Peer supports and inclusive education: An underutilized resource. Theory into Practice. 2006; 45(3):224–9. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4503_4.
  • Kim J-R. Influence of teacher preparation programmes on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011; 15(3):355–77. DOI: 10.1080/13603110903030097.
  • Scorgie K. A powerful glimpse from across the table: Reflections on a virtual parenting exercise. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2010; 14(7):697–708. DOI: 10.1080/13603111003778494.
  • De Boer A, Pijl SJ, Minnaert A. Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011; 15(3):331–53. DOI: 10.1080/13603110903030089.
  • Pijl SJ. Preparing teachers for inclusive education: Some reflections from the Netherlands. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs. 2010; 10(1):197–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01165.x.
  • March E. Inclusive educational practices for students with disabilities within the European Union [PhD thesis in elementary, special and teacher education]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2008.
  • Forlin C, Chambers D. Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 2011; 39(1):17–32. DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850.
  • French NK, Chopra RV. Teachers as executives. Theory into Practice. 2006; 45(3):230–8. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4503_5.
  • Schmidt M, Cagran B. Classroom climate in regular primary school settings with children with special needs. Educational Studies. 2006; 32(4):361–72. DOI: 10.1080/03055690600850123.
  • Brandon T, Charlton J. The lessons learned from developing an inclusive learning and teaching community of practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011; 15(1):165–78. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2010.496214.
  • Wong DK. Do contacts make a difference? The effects of mainstreaming on student attitudes toward people with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2008; 29(1):70–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.11.002.
  • Scott P. Globalization and higher education: Challenges for the 21st century. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2000; 4(1):3–10. DOI: 10.1177/102831530000400102.
  • Malofeev NN. Spetsialnoe obrazovanie v menyaushchemsya mire. Rossiya [Special education in a changing world. Russia: textbook.]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie; 2010. Part 1. [in Russian].
  • UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities; 2006. Available from:
  • Constitution of the Russian Federation. 1993. Available from:
  • FZ-46. Federal law on ratification of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities dated May 3, 2012. Available from: hotlaw/federal/396011/ [in Russian].
  • FZ-181. Federal law about social protection for disabled persons in the Russian Federation dated November 24, 1995. Available from:
  • FZ-273. Federal Law about education in the Russian Federation dated 29.12.2012. Available from:
  • FZ-195. Federal law on fundamentals of social services for the populace of the russian federation dated 10.12.1995 (amended and revised). Available from: [in Russian].
  • Russian federation presidential decree dated May 7, 2012 No. 599, On measures to implement the state policy in the sphere of education and science. [in Russian].
  • Russian federation presidential decree dated June 1, 2012 No. 761 on national strategy of actions in children’s interests for the period of 2012-2017. Available from: [in Russian].
  • Russian Federation government decree No.175 dated 17.03.2011 On the state program of the Russian Federation, Accessible Environment, 2011-2015. Available from:
  • Decree, On packages of measures on employment of persons with disabilities and support of the availability of professional education for 2012-2015 dated October 15, 2012 No. 1921-p. Available from:
  • The concept of development of special (correctional) education of children with disabilities (approved by the Department of Education of Vologda region dated 06.09.2010 No.1525). Available from:
  • The law of Vologda region, On the protection of family, motherhood, fatherhood and childhood in Vologda region” dated December 29, 2003 No. 982-Regional Law (RL) (as amended); Available from: [in Russian].
  • The law of Vologda region, On measures of social support for certain categories of citizens to realize the right to education dated January 28, 2005 No. 1218-RL (as amended); Available from: [in Russian].
  • Vologda region Government Decree, On approval of the Strategy of Actions for Children’s interests in Vologda region for 2012-2017 dated 07.09.2012 No. 1052. Available from: [in Russian].
  • The long-term target program, Barrier-Free Environment for 2010-2014, approved by the Government of Vologda region dated March 26, 2010, No.334 (as amended); Available from: [in Russian].
  • The State Program, Development of Education of Vologda region for 2013-2017; Available from: [in Russian].
  • The target program, Creation of flexible environment in Cherepovets State University for 2013-15” and others. Available from: [in Russian].
  • Karaganova MM, Shcherbakova EI. The implementation of the first phase of the inclusive education model in the Vologda region: Experience and problems. Proceedings of Regional Pedagogical Readings Inclusion in Education- a comprehensive approach to education and of upbringing children (25 November to 16 December 2013). Available from: [in Russian].
  • Denisova OA, Lekhanova OL, Ponikarova VN. Additional professional education of teachers for inclusive education of preschool children with disabilities. Journal of Psychological Science and Education 2013; 3:119–28. Available from: [in Russian].
  • Denisova OA, Lekhanova OL, Ponikarova VN. Teachers’ training to implement inclusive education. Bulletin of Cherepovets State University: Scientific Journal. 2012; 1(4):109–12. [in Russian].
  • Denisova OA, Lekhanova OL, Ponikarova VN, Klimenko OY. Resource center as a condition for the integration of persons with disabilities into educational environment of Cherepovets State University. Proceedings of Regional Pedagogical Readings ‘Inclusion in Education- a comprehensive approach to education and upbringing children’ (25 November – 16 December 2013). Available from: [in Russian].
  • Denisova OA, Lekhanova OL, Ponikarova VN, Bukin IA. Regional experience in designing teacher training educational programs for inclusive education of children with disabilities. Inclusive education: Practice, research, methodology: II International Scientific and Practical Conference Information Package Moscow. 2013. p. 564–8. [in Russian].
  • Denisova OA, Lekhanova OL, Ponikarova VN. Strategy and tactics of inclusive education teachers training. Journal of Defectology. 2012; 3:81–90. [in Russian].
  • Ponikarova VN. Comparative study of occupational coping behavior of teachers-defectologists. Cherepovets: ChSU Press; 2011. p. 48–59. [in Russian].


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.