Total views : 265

Hybrid-POLCA in Job Shop Manufacturing


  • Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering University Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Durian Tunggal - 76100, Melaka, Malaysia


With increasing competition and customers’ demand, manufacturers are faced with the challenge of improving throughput and on-time deliveries. This issues is further complicated for job shop manufacturing due to variabilities in demands, process flow and process time. This paper proposes a hybrid material flow control mechanism that combines a dispatching rule with the POLCA system in job shop environment. Data are collected from a case company and discrete event simulation is used to evaluate the Work In Process (WIP), throughput (TP), average Manufacturing Critical path Time (MCT) per job and On-Time Delivery (OTD) for three different flow controls. The performance of each model is evaluated and statistically validated. In this study, the hybrid POLCA performs the best for all performance measures.


Dispatching Rule, Job Shop, Material Flow Control, POLCA, Quick Response Manufacturing.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 207)


  • Suri R. Quick Response Manufacturing: A Companywide Approach to Reducing Lead Time. New York: Productivity Press, 1998.
  • Suri R. It’s About Time. United States: Productivity Press, 2010.
  • Stevenson M, Hendry LC, Kingsman BG. A review of production planning and control: the applicability of key concepts to the make-to-order industry. Int J Prod Res. 2005; 43(5):869–98.
  • Ryan SM, Fred Choobineh F. Total WIP and WIP mix for a CONWIP controlled job shop. IIE Trans. 2002; 1–41.
  • Fernandes NO, do Carmo-Silva S. Generic POLCA-A production and materials flow control mechanism for quick response manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ. 2006; 104(1):74–84.
  • Vandaele N, Van Nieuwenhuyse I, Claerhout D, Cremmery R. Load-Based POLCA: An Integrated Material Control System for Multiproduct, Multimachine Job Shops. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. 2015 Feb; 10:181–97.
  • Germs R, Riezebos J. Workload balancing capability of pull systems in MTO production. Int J Prod Res. 2010; 48(8):2345–60.
  • Braglia M, Castellano D, Frosolini M. A study on the importance of selection rules within unbalanced MTO POLCA-controlled production systems. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 2015; 20(4):457–68.
  • Ziengs N, Riezebos J, Germs R. Placement of effective work-in-progress limits in route-specific unit-based pull systems. Int J Prod Res. 2012; 50(16):4358–71.
  • Farnoush A, Wiktorsson M. POLCA and CONWIP performance in a divergent production line: An automotive case study. J Manag Control. 2013; 24(2):159–86.
  • Bhatewara V. Analysis of POLCA and GPOLCA Material Control Strategies. 2010.
  • Harrod S, Kanet JJ. Applying work flow control in make-to-order job shops. Int J Prod Econ. 2013; 143(2): 620–6.
  • Satoglu SI, Ucan K. Redesigning the material supply system of the automotive suppliers based on lean principles and an application. IEOM 2015 - 5th Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag. Proceeding, 2015.
  • Blackstone JH, Phillips DT, Hogg GL. A state-of-the-art survey of dispatching rules for manufacturing job shop operations. Int J Prod Res. 1982; 20(1):27–45.
  • Haupt R. A Survey of Priority Rule-Based Scheduling. Or Spektrum. 1989; 11(1):3–16.
  • Ramasesh R. Dynamic Job Shop Scheduling - A Survey of Simulation Research. Omega-International J Manag Sci. 1990; 18(1):43–57.
  • Reeja MK, Rajendran C. Dispatching rules for scheduling in assembly jobshops - Part 2. Int J Prod Res. 2000; 38(10):2349–60.
  • Robinson S. Simulation: The Practical of Model Development and Use. England: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  • Banks J, Carson J, Nelson BL, Nicol D. Discrete-Event System Simulation. United State: Pearson, 2010.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.