Total views : 141

Optimizing Weed Control by Integrating the Best Herbicide Rate and Bio-agents in Wheat Field


  • Department of Agro-Biotechnology, Institute of Agriculture, RUDN University, Moscow, 117198,Russia;
  • Department of Agro-Engineering, Institute of Agriculture, RUDN University, Moscow, 117198, Russia;
  • Department of Agro-Biotechnology, Institute of Agriculture, RUDN University, Moscow, 117198, Russia;


Objectives: Study of reducing the rates of a new generation herbicide verdict in combination with some biocontrol components under the field condition of Moscow to suppress Avena fatua and broad-leaved weeds and consequently maintaining satisfactory crop yield under intensive technology. Method/Statistical analysis: Field experiment were laid out to appraise the efficacy of reduced concentrations of a post-emergence herbicide verdict in combination with biocontrol agent to suppress three major weeds (Chenopodium album, Avena fatua and Capsella bursa-pastoris) in wheat field under the condition of Non-chernozem zone, Moscow region. Findings: Shown labeled concentration 0.3 kg/ha-1 + bio-agents was effective in reducing total weed populations. This study showed that a desirable weed reduction in wheat was achieved when intermediate herbicide rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 and bio-agents were used, that was comparable to the result which achieved for registered verdict dose as 0.5 kg/ha-1. Hence, despite the higher weed reduction efficacy was obtained with herbicide in registered label dose plus biocontrol agent, but the differences were not significant in comparison with below herbicide dose 0.3 kg/ha-1. Meanwhile, the best energy output (90.3 GDj/ha-1), agricultural efficiency (19.9%) and wheat grain yield 7.80 t/ha-1 were achieved when reduced rate 0.3 kg/ha-1 combined to bio-agent were applied. Application /Improvement: Cutting of herbicide dosage without compromising grain yield can cause to less environmental pollution and lower production costs, besides, can reduce weed population desirably.


Agronomical Efficiency, Energy Output, Reduced Herbicide Rate, Weed, Wheat Yield

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 150)


  • Baghestani MA, Zand E, Soufizadeh S, Bagherin N, Deihimfard R. Weed control and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield under application of 2,4 – D plus carfentrazoneethyl and florasulam plus flumetsulam: evaluation of the efficacy. Crop Protection. 2007; 26(12):1759–64.
  • Qasim JR, Foy CL. Weed allelopathy; its ecological impact and future prospect. Journal of Crop Production. 2001; 4(2):43–120.
  • Devlin DL, Long JH, Maddux LD. Using reduced rates of post-emergence herbicides in soybeans ( Glycine max).Weed Technology. 1991; 5(4):834–40.
  • Spandle EB, Durgan R, Miller DW. Wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 1997; 11(2):591–7.
  • Stougaard RN, Maxwell BD, Harris JD. Influence of application timing on the efficacy of reduced rate postemergence herbicides for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Technology. 1997; 11(2):283–9.
  • Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Barroso J, Recasense J, Sans X, Torner C, Sanchez Del Arco MJ. Demography of Lolium rigidum in winter barley crops: Analysis of recruitment, survival and reproduction. Weed Research. 1998; 40(1):281–91.
  • Brian P, Wilson BJ, Wright KJ, Seavers GP, Caseley JC.Modelling the effect of crop and weed on herbicide efficacy in wheat. Weed Research. 1999; 39(1):21–35.
  • Navarrete L, Del Arco MJS, Gonzales PR, Taberner A, Tievas MA. Curvas de dosis respuesta para avena loca y vallico en cultivos de cebada de invierno. XIX Reunión Anual del Grupo de Trabajo Malas Hierbas y Herbicidas, Oviedo; 2000. p. 50–3.
  • Zhang J, Weaver SE, Hamill AS. Risks and reliability of using herbicides at below-labeled doses. Weed Technology.2000; 14(3):106–15.
  • Bostrom U, Fogelrors H. Response of weeds and crop yield to herbicide dose decision – support guidelines. Weed Science. 2002; 50(2):186–95.
  • Hamill AS, Weaver SE, Sikkema PH, Swanton CJ, Tardif FJ, Ferguson GM. Benefits and risks of economic vs. efficacionus approaches to weed management in corn and soybean.Weed Technology. 2004; 18:723–32.
  • Talgre L, Lauringson E, Koppel M. Effect of reduced herbicide dosages on weed infestation in spring barley.Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2008; 95:194–201.
  • Barroso J, Ruiz D, Escribano C, Barrios L, FernandezQuintanilla C. Comparison of three chemical control strategies for Avena sterlis ssp. ludoviciana. Crop Protection.2009; 28:393–400.
  • Beckie HJ. Herbicide-resistant weeds: Management tactics and practices. Weed Technology. 2006; 20:793–814.
  • Egan JF, Maxwell BD, Mortensen DA, Ryan MR, Smith RG. 2, 4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D)–resistant Q:1 crops and the potential for evolution of 2, 4 D–resistant weeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108 E37. 2011 Mar 3; 108(11). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017414108.
  • Powles SB, Yu Q. Evolution in action: plant resistance to herbicides.Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2010; 61:317–47.
  • Blackshaw RE, O’Donovan JT, Harker KN, Clayton GW, Stugard RN. Reduced herbicide doses in field crops: A review. Weed Biology and Management. 2006; 6:10–17.
  • Belles DS, Thill DC, Shafi B. PP-604 rate and Avena fatua density effects on seed production and viability in Hordeum vulgare. Weed Science. 2000; 48:378–84.
  • O’Donovan JT, Harker, KN, Clayton GW, Newman JC, Robinson D, Hall LM. Barley seeding rate influences the effects of variable herbicide rates on wild oat. Weed Science.2001; 49(6):746–54.
  • Zand E, Mohammad AB, Saeid S, Reza PA, Mozhgan V, Naser B, Alireza B, Mohammad MK, Nooshin N.Broadleaved weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with post-emergence herbicides in Iran. Crop Protection. 2007; 26:746–52.
  • Walker SR, Medd W, Robinson GR, Cullis BR. Improved management of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris paradoxa with more densely sown wheat and less herbicide. Weed Resin. 2002; 42:257–70.
  • Auskalnis A, Kadzys A. Effect of timing and dosage in herbicide application on weed biomass in spring wheat.Agronomy Research. 2006; 4:133–6.
  • Barros JFC, Basch G, Carvalho M. Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence herbicide to control grass and broadleaved weeds in no-till wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Protection. 2007; 26:1538–45.
  • Busey P. Cultural management of weeds in turfgrass: A review. Crop Science. 2003; 43:1899–911.
  • Cousens R, Croft AM. Weed populations and pathogens.Weed Resin. 2000; 40:63–82.
  • Kennedy AC, Kremer RG. Microorganisms in weed control strategies. Journal of Production Agriculture. 1996; 9:480–5.
  • Radosevich S, Holt J, Ghersa C. Weed ecology– implications for management. J. Wiley: New York; 1997. p. 589.
  • Salonen J. Efficacy of reduced herbicide doses in spring cereals of different competitive ability. Weed Resin. 1992; 32:483–91.
  • Dickerson JR, Fay PK. Biology and control of hound’stongue (Cynoglossum officinale). Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science. 1982; 35:83–5.
  • Upadhyaya MK, Cranston RS. Distribution, biology, and control of houndstongue in British Columbia. Rangelands.1991; 13:103–6.
  • Barros JFC, Basch G, De Carvalho M. Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence graminicide mixture to control Lolium rigidum G. in winter wheat under direct drilling in Mediterranean environment. Crop Protection. 2005; 24:880–7.
  • DeClerck-Floate RA, Schwartzla¨nder M. Cynoglossum officinale (L.) houndstongue (Boraginaceae). In: Mason PG, Huber JT, editors. Biological Control Programmes in Canada. Wallingfor; 2002. p. 1981–2000.
  • DeClerck-Floate RA, Wikeem B, Bourchier RS. Early establishment and dispersal of the weevil Mogulones cruciger (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for biological control of houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale) in British Columbia, Canada. Biocontrol Science and Technology.2005; 15:173–90.
  • Basu C, Halfill MD, Mueller TC, Stewart CNJ. Weed genomics: new tool to understand weed biology. Trends Plant Sci.2004; 9:391–8.
  • Buhler DD. Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Science. 2002; 50:273–80.
  • Hatcher PE, Melander B. Combining physical, cultural and biological methods: Prospects for integrated non-chemical weed management strategies. Weed Resin. 2003; 43:303–22.
  • Larsen SU, Kristoffersen P, Fischer J. Turfgrass management and weed control without pesticides on football pitches in Denmark. Pest Management Science. 2004; 50:579–87.
  • Bailey KL, Mupondwa EK. Developing microbial weed control products: Commercial, biological, and technological considerations. In: Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK, editors. Handbook of Sustainable Weed Management. The Haworth Press Inc., Binghamton, NY; 2006.
  • Boyetchko SM. Biological herbicides in the future. In: J.A. Ivany, editor. Weed Management in Transition. Topics in Canadian Weed Science. Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec. Canadian Weed Science Society - Societe canadienne de malherbologie; 2005.
  • Delfosse ES. Introduction. In: Coombs EM, Clark JK, Piper GL, editors. Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the United States; 2004.
  • Pleban S, Strobel GA. Rapid evaluation of Fusarium spp. as a potential biocontrol agent for weeds. Weed Science. 1998; 46:703–6.
  • Frantzen J. An epidemiological study of Puccinia punctiformis (Str.) Ro ¨ hl as a stepping-stone to the biological control of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. New Phytologist.1994; 127:147–54.
  • Charudattan R, Dinoor A. Biological control of weeds using plant pathogens: accomplishments and limitations.Crop Protection. 2000; 19:691–5.
  • Hasan S, Ayres PG. The control of weeds through fungi: principles and prospects. New Phytologist. 1999; 115:201– 22.
  • Hoagland RE. Microbial allelochemicals and pathogens as bioherbicidal agents. Weed Technology. 2001; 15:835–57.
  • Scheepens PC, Müller-Schärer H, Kempenaar C.Opportunities for biological weed control in Europe.
  • Biological Control. 2001; 46:127–38.
  • Bulatkin GA. Environmental and energy aspects agro-productivity, Pushino; 1986. p. 210.
  • SAS institute. The SAS system for windows, release 9.1. The Institute Cary, NC, USA; 2002.
  • Barros JFC, Basch G, Freixial R, Carvalho M. Effect of reduced doses of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron to control weeds in no-till wheat under Mediterranean conditions.Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2009; 7(4):905– 12.
  • Barros JC, Basch G, Calado JG, Carvalho M. Reduced doses of herbicides to control weeds in barley crops under temperate climate conditions. Revista Brasileira Ciências Agrárias Recife. 2001; 6(2):197–202.
  • Kieloch R, Domaradzki K. The role of the growth stage of weeds in their response to reduced herbicide doses. Acta Agrobotanica. 2011; 64(4):259–66.
  • Buczek J, Szpunar-Krok E, Tobiasz-Salach R, BobreckaJamro D. Influence of sowing density and dose tribenuronmetyl on weed infestation in spring wheat.Progress of Plant Protection/Postępy W Ochronie Roślin.2012; 52 (1):62–6.
  • Bayer. Bayer crop science [Internet]. [cited 2010 Jan 10].Available from:
  • Medd RW, Van de Den J, Pickering DI, Nordblom T.Determination of environment-specific dose-response relationships for clodinafop-propargyl on Avena spp. Weed Resin. 2001; 41:351–68.
  • Randall JM. In: Spencer N, Noweierski N, editor. A conservation biologist’s perspective on biocontrol of weeds.Abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA; 1999. p. 56.
  • Hallet SG. Where are the bioherbicides? Weed Science.2005; 53:404–15.
  • Fernandez-Quintanilla C, Barroso J, Recasens J, Sans X, Torner, C, Sánchez Del Arco MJ. Demography of Lolium rigidum in winter barley crops: Analysis of recruitment, survival and reproduction. Weed Resin. 2000; 40(3):281– 91.
  • Barros JFC, Basch G, De Carvalho M. Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence graminicide to control Avena sterilis L. and Lolium rigidum G. in no-till wheat under Mediterranean environment. Crop Protein. 2008; 27:1031– 7.
  • Manalil S, Busi R, Renton M, Powles SB. Rapid evolution of herbicide resistance by low herbicide dosages. Weed Science. 2011; 59:210–17.
  • Norsworthy JK, Ward SM, Shaw DR, Llewellyn RS, Nichols RL, Webster TM, Bradley KW, Frisvold G, Powles SB, Burgos NR, Witt WW, Barrett M. Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations.Weed Science. 2012; 31–62.
  • Whinguiri EE, Kemp DR. Spikelets development and grain yield of wheat ears in response to applied nitrogen.Australian Journal of Agricultural Research.1980; 31:637– 47.
  • Erman M, Tepe I, Yazlik A, Levent R, Ipek K. Effect of weed control treatments on weeds, seed yield, yield components and nodulation in winter lentil. Weed Resin. 2003; 44:305– 12.
  • Gupta OP. Modern weeds management. 2nd ed. Agro Bios, Jodhpur, India; 2004. p. 18–23.
  • Cheema ZA, Khaliq A. Use of sorghum allelopathic properties to control weeds in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid region of Punjab. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 2000; 79:105–12.
  • Doyle P, Stypa M. Reduced herbicide rates—a Canadian perspective. Weed Technology. 2004; 18:1157–65.
  • Steckel LE, Defelice MS, Sims BD. Integrating reduced doses of post emergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Science. 1990; 38:541–5.
  • Vitta JI, Faccini DE, Nisensohn LA. Control of Amaranthus quitensis in soybean crops in Argentina: An Alternative to Reduce Herbicide Use. Crop Protein. 2000; 19:511–13.
  • Cheema ZA, Jaffer I, Khaliq A. Reducing isoproturon dose in combination with sorgaab for weed control in wheat. Pakistan Journal of Weed Sciences Research. 2003; 9(3&4):153–60.
  • Pervanchon F, Bockstaller C, Girardin P. Assessment of energy use in arable farming systems by means of an agroecological indicator: The energy indicator. Agricultural Systems. 2002; 72:149–72.
  • Gundogmuz E, Bayramoglu Z. Energy input use on organic farming: A comparative analysis of organic versus conventional farm in Turkey. Journal of Agronomy. 2006;5(1):16–22.
  • Rathke GW, Behrense T, Diepenbrock W. Integrated nitrogen management strategies to improve seed yield, oil content and nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2006; 117:80–108.
  • Saeed M, Meisam Z, Kiumars F. The best application time and dose of herbicide for optimum weed management in two red bean cultivars. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2012 Jan; 5(1). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2012/ v5i1/30943.
  • Chakravarthy VD, Nagarajan V. Techniques for optimizing power utilization in data center network architectures: A survey report. Indian Journal of Science and Technology.2016 Oct; 9(37). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i37/102066.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.