Total views : 179

Factors Affecting Health Screening Action


  • Department of Clinical Laboratory Science Daejeon Health Institute of Technology, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
  • Department of Physical Therapy, SunMoon University, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of


Objectives: This study is conducted to investigate the factors related to the willingness of cancer screening with the ¨National Nutrition Survey Original document, a national representative health related survey data. Methods/Statistical Analysis: 4,817 subjects were finally selected and analyzed among 8,108 participated in national nutrition survey in 2013 who are above 30-year-old, the recommended age of uterine cervical cancer screening program which is the minimum age in several cancer screening recommendation program, after deducted the missing value. Findings: According to the study differentiate factors related to correlation analysis for the checkup were place of residence, subjective state of health, stress recognition level, weight control in 1 year, the number of moderate physical activity date in a week, smoking, alcohol intake amount, and subjective body perception. Improvements/Applications: Therefore, the public relations should be strengthened to encourage people in having checkup, and activate check-up program to improve check-up rate for enhancing the national health.


Cancer, Health, National Nutrition Survey, Smoking, Stress.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 163)


  • Lim YA, Lee K, Jo Y. Relationship between life style and obesity indices in adults using data from health examination Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2015, 16(5):3243–56.
  • Lee SK, Boksukang. A study on perception and attitudes of examinees of health screening center towards health examination. Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine. 1996; 13(1):50–77.
  • Lim JH, Kim SY. Factors affecting colorectal cancer screening behaviors. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. 2011; 28(1):69–80.
  • Hahm MI. Personal background and cognitive factors as predictors of the intention to be screened for stomach cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2008; 17(9):2473–9.
  • Soskolne V. Beliefs recommendations and intentions are important explanatory factors of mammography screening behavior among muslimarab women in Israel. Health Education Research. 2007; 22(5):665–76.
  • Honda K. Cognitive mediators liking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2006; 29(5):449–60.
  • Tolma EL. Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Education and Behavior. 2006; 33(2):233–51.
  • Oetzel J, Vargas D, Ginossar FT, Sanchez C. Hispanic women's preferences for breast health information. Subjective cultural influences on source, message, and channel. Health Communication. 2007; 21:223–33.
  • Kim YM, Park JH, Kim WJ. Analysis of utilization characteristics, health behaviors and health management level of participants in private health examination in a general hospital. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2013,14(1);301–11
  • The Ministry of Health and Welfare [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 03]. Available from:
  • Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: Results of a systematic review and analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006 Jul; 31(1):52–61.
  • Afrifa CG, Ofosu1 FG, Bamford SA, Atiemo SM, Aboh IJK, Gyampo O, Ahiamadjie H, Adeti JP, Arthur JK. Health risk assessment of heavy metal exposure from soil dustat selected fuel filling stations in Accra. International Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Jul; 4(7):289–96.
  • Akoto O, Abankwa E. Heavy metals contamination and speciation in sediments of the Owabi reservoir. Environmental Research Journal. 2014; 8(1):10–16.
  • Kim JS, Lee DY. Study of the precocious puberty and related-hormone concentration. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Sep; 8(21):1–5.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.