Total views : 174

Online Education Resources and Student Needs: Stylistic Aspects


  • Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P.P. Semenov-Tayn-Shansky, Lipetsk, Russia


Objectives: This work continues a long-term study of the student needs and preferences by using open network education resources oriented to online support of the educational process. Methods: The importance of online education resource components has been determined by pedagogical university students using the method of paired comparisons from two points of view – that of the student and that of the teacher (corresponding to learning/teaching stylistics). Findings: During the study: a) a comparative analysis of the stylistic characteristics of the respondents in 2011 and 2016 has been undertaken and changing attitudes of future teachers to the teaching stylistics from “expert” to “facilitator” have been revealed; b) the importance of resource components in physics correlated with their stylistic features has been defined; c) the prevailing learning and teaching styles of open network education resources, affecting the efficiency of user training, have been identified; d) arguments in support of taking into consideration student’s stylistic preferences at the design stage of education resources have been posed. These methods of studying stylistic peculiarities of Internet education resources are unique, and the authors are interested in discussing the results. Applications/Improvements: Consideration of the diversity of the student audience needs allows adapting the learning resources to rapidly changing conditions of the educational process. The results can be used to improve the efficiency and comfort of online self-study process.


Learning and Teaching Styles, Open Network Education Resources, Student’s Stylistic Preferences, Stylistic Aspects of Open Network Education Resources.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 211)


  • The number of internet users in Russia [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 29]. Available from:
  • Nikulova GA, Bobrova LN. Students moved to the Internet: the presence, preferences, influence. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2016;19(2):645–61.
  • Martyshenko N S, Martyshenko S N. Modern trends in the structure of students amusement in many ways. Socio-Economic Phenomena and Processes, 2013; 1(47):112–16.
  • E-Learning Market Trends and Forecast 2014–2016 Report. Docebo [Internet]. [cited 2014 Mar]. Available from:
  • Ho AD, Chuang I, Reich J, Coleman C, Whitehill J, Northcutt C, Williams JJ, Hansen J, Lopez G, Petersen R. Harvard X and MIT x: Two years of open online courses, Harvard X Working Paper. 2015; 10:1–37.
  • Nikulova GA, Bobrova LN, Marchev DV. Features of internet resources attractiveness for educational purposes: The stylistic aspects of teaching and consumer properties. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2014; 17(2):569–97.
  • Lee J. Adaptive courseware using Kolb’s learning styles. International Magazine on Advances in Computer Science and Telecommunications. 2012; 3(1):45–59.
  • Fan YJ, Teng PS, Luh DB. An exploration of the attraction factors of learning websites [Internet]. 2013. Available from:
  • Bobrova LN, Nikulova GA. Analysis of the relationship factors usability of open network education resources to support teaching and self-education. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2015; 18(2):651–72.
  • Braun T. Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 2008; 16(1):63–92.
  • Asdaque M, Khan M, Rizvi S. Effect of internet on the academic performance and social life of university students in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Sociology. 2010:21–7.
  • Felder RM, Spurlin JE. applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2005; 21(1):103–12.
  • Do learning styles exist? [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 20]. Available from:
  • Geake J. Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research. 2008; 50(2):123–33.
  • Newton PM. The learning styles myth is thriving in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 6:1–5.
  • Bobrova LN, Nikulova GA. Expansion of the range of criteria-based assessment software for educational purposes. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2011; 14(2):382–406.
  • Oconnor T. Using learning styles to adapt technology for higher education. Cirt learning styles site (Indiana State University); 1997.
  • Felder RM, Silverman LK. Learning and teaching stylistics in engineering education. Engineering Education. 1988; 78(7):674–81.
  • Bobrova LN, Nikulova GA. Software tools for educational purposes: The manifestation of role style of teaching. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society. 2012; 15(2):493–516.
  • Alonso JA, Lamata MT. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge based systems. 2006; 14(4):445–59.
  • Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2009; 9(3):105–19.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.