Total views : 231

Store Brands in Consumer Durables - A Success Story


  • VELS University, Chennai – 600117, India


Objectives: The paper aims to study the influences of price, store image, perceived quality, and brand association on customer satisfaction of electronic store brands. Is introducing store brand in electronic goods advantageous for the retailer? What makes the consumer to purchase a store brand? Methods/Statistical Analysis: The paper uses multivariate statistical techniques to understand the reasons behind the purchase of the store brands (both small and big appliances). This paper provides empirical insights about how the introduction of store brands is giving the retailer the competitive edge. Findings: The consumer prefers the store brand due to the store image, price, perceived quality and brand association of the retailer. Of these factors the most influential is the perceived quality. Examination of the preference of the consumer reveals that the retailer is able to retain his shoppers due to store brand. The prices have to be set carefully along with the increased perceived quality to retain them. Lately, many big retailers have added store brands in their assortment in all their product categories which is discussed in the media with their implications on the dominated channel management. Applications/Improvement: The main motivation for this research is the Neilson report on Global Private Label. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of that trend especially with consumer durables.


Electronic Consumer Durables, Multivariate Analysis, Perceived Quality, Store Brands, Store Image.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 237)


  • Keith Lincoln, Lars Thomassen. Private Label: Turning the Retail Brand Threat into your Biggest Opportunity. First Edition. Kogan Page: UK; 2009 May.
  • Quality Perceptions of Private Label Brands: Conceptual Framework and Agenda for Research. February 2008 Available from
  • Glynn MS, Chen S. Consumer-factors moderating, private label brand success: further empirical results. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. 2009; 37(11): 896–914.
  • Ekaterina Salnikova, John L Stanton, Neal H Hooker. Brand Battles: Are store brands acting more like National brands? International Journal of Management Cases. 2013; 15(4): 265–354
  • Reda S. Department stores struggle to reinvent troubled model. Stores. 2002; 84(7): 22.
  • Ailawadi KL, Pauwels K, Steenkamp JBEM. Private-label use and store loyalty. Journal of Marketing. 2008 Nov; 72(6): 19–30.
  • Batra R, Sinha I. Consumer-level factors moderating the success of private label brands. Journal of Retailing. 2000; 76 (2): 175–191.
  • Burton S, Lichtenstein DR, Netemeyer RG, Garretson JA. A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Academy of Marketing Science Journal. 1998 Oct; 26(4): 293–306.
  • Regina Virvilaite, Migle Daily Diene Kaunas. Strengthening of a private brand: the aspect of a store’s image. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics. 2012; 23(1): 90–8.
  • Ipek, Ilayda Askın, Nilay, Ilter, Burcu. Private label usage and store loyalty: The moderating impact of shopping value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2016 July; 31: 72–9. 8p.
  • Martineau PD. The personality of the retail store. Harvard Business Review. 1958; 36: 47-55.
  • Boles, James S, Hiram C Barksdale, Jr., and Julie T Johnson. Business relationships: An examination of the effects of buyer–salesperson relationships on customer retention and willingness to refer and recommend. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing. 1997; 12 (3–4): 253–63.
  • Ganesan, Shankar. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing. 1994 April; 58: 1–19.
  • Ishida, Chiharu, Janet E Keith, James R Brown, and James E Stoddard. The Contingency Effects of Supplier Influence Strategies and Their Implications for Retailer Cooperation. Journal of Marketing Channels. 2006; 14 (1–2): 23–48.
  • Dick A, Jain A, Richardson P. Correlates of store brand proneness: some empirical observations. Journal of Product and Brand Management. 1995; 4(4): 15–22.
  • Erdem, Zhao, Valenzuela. Performance of store brands: a cross-country analysis of consumer store-brand preferences, perceptions, and risk, Journal of Marketing Research. 2004 Feb; XLI: 86–100.
  • Aaker DA. Building Strong Brands, New York: Free Press; 1996.
  • Gonzalez-Mieres C, Diaz-Martin AM, and Trespalacios-Gutierrez JA. Antecedents of the difference in perceived risk between store brands and National brands. European Journal of Marketing. 2006; 40(1): 61–82.
  • Richardson PS, Jain AK and Alan D. Household store brand proneness: a framework. Journal of Retailing. 1996; 72(2): 159–185.
  • Richardson, Paul S, Arun K Jain, Alan Dick. Household store brand proneness: a framework. Journal of Retailing. 1996; 72(2): 159–185.
  • Dick A, Jain A, Richardson P. Correlates of store brand proneness: some empirical observations. Journal of Product and Brand Management. 1995; 4(4): 15–22.
  • Erdem, Zhao, Valenzuela. Performance of store brands: a cross-country analysis of consumer store-brand preferences, perceptions, and risk. Journal of Marketing Research. 2004 Feb; vol. XLI: 86–100.
  • Hu L, Bentler P. Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structure Equation Modelling. 1999: 1–55.
  • Kuvykaite R, Auruskeviciene V. Marketing astarptautinesefirmose: elektroninisvadovelis. Kaunas: Technologija; 2001.
  • Therasa C, Vijayabanu C, Vijayanand V. An empirical approach to probe the relationship between advertisement and brand image – a rural perspective. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 9(27): 1–9.
  • Hoch SJ, Banerji, S. When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Review. Summer 1993: 57–67.
  • Guadagni, Peter M, John DC Little. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science. 1983; 2(3): 203–38.
  • Grover R, Srinivasan V. Evaluating the multiple effects of retail promotions on brand loyal and brand switching segments. Journal of Marketing Research. 1992; 29(2): 76–89.
  • Krishnan AR, Hari K. Factors determining customer satisfaction in consumer durable white goods: factor analysis approach. APJRBM. Sri Krishna International Research and Educational Consortium. 2011 June; 2(6).
  • Moberg, Anders. Speech by President and CEO Anders Moberg. A hold Annual General Meeting. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2016. 06 October 2011 Available from http://
  • Ailawadi K, Lehmann DR. Brand equity easily measured by revenue premium. Marketing News. 2003; 37(22): 53–4.
  • Daymon C, Holloway I. Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications, Routledge: London; 2002.
  • Gianfranco Walsh, Landau Louise M Hassan, Heriot, Edward MK Shiu. Why Consumers Buy Manufacturer Brands – Does Quality Really Matter? University of Strathclyde. ANZMAC; 2009 Abstract.
  • Beauducel A, Wittmann WW. Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling. 2005; 12 (1): 41–75.
  • Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA and Long JS, Editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA; Sage; 1993: 136–162.
  • Marsh HW, Hau, Kit-Tai, Wen Z. In search of golden rules:comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling. 2004; 11(3): 320–41.
  • Yuan Y, MacKinnon DP. Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods. 2009; 14: 301–322.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.