Total views : 78

Earth Pressure behind a Retaining Wall under Linearly Varying Geotechnical Parameters

Affiliations

  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The NorthCap University, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122017, India

Abstract


Objectives: The present study discuss estimation of active and passive earth pressure behind a smooth vertical retaining wall with horizontal backfill under linearly varying geotechnical properties, i.e., cohesion (c), angle of internal friction (φ) and unit weight (γ) of backfill vary linearly with depth.It is noted that the earth pressure behind the retaining wall is nonlinear and its variation can be established through regression analysis that follows 2nd order polynomial in the form of pa = -az2+bz+c; where z is the depth below the backfill surface, a, b & c are constants. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Regression analysis incorporating least square error approach option is available in Microsoft excel in data analysis tool pack. The total amount of thrust (active or passive ) estimated through non-linear distribution of earth pressure behind retaining wall is compared with the corresponding values computed through most widely used Rankine’s earth pressure theory in which average values of geotechnical parameters are taken. Findings: It is noted that there is 5-7% reduction in the active earth thrust although not much reduction is achieved in the moment. In passive case, the increase in passive thrust is almost 20%. Application/Improvements: Consideration of non-linear earth pressure distribution is useful in situations where base width of the retaining wall is controlled with respect to base shear. It will ultimately lead to reduction in the total cost of construction of the retaining wall and will help in achieving economy when the length of the retaining wall is large.

Keywords

Earth Pressure, Geotechnical, Regression,Retaining Wall

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 137)

References


  • Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal.1999; 36: 612–24.
  • Rankine W. On the stability of loose earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1857; 147.
  • Bowles JE. Foundation analysis and Design. 5th ed.McGraw-Hill Co. NY; 1996.
  • Clayton CRI, Woods RI, Bond AJ, Milititsky J. Earth Pressure and Earth-Retaining Structures. 3rd edition, CRC press, Taylor and Francis; 2014.
  • Paik KH, Salgado R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effect.Geotechnique. 2003; 53(7): 643–5.
  • Yu-jin Sun, Er-xiang Song. Active earth pressure analysis based on normal stress distribution function along failure surface in soil obeying nonlinear failure criterion. Acta Geotechnica. 2016; 11(2): 255–68.
  • Kuo-Hsin Yang, Chia-Nan Liu. Finite element analysis of earth pressures fornarrow retaining walls. Journal of GeoEngineering. 2007; 2(2): 43–52.
  • Handy RL. The arch in soil arching. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1985; 111(3): 302–18.
  • Harrop-Williams K. Arching in soil arch. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1989; 115(3): 415–9.
  • Wang YZ. Distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall. Geotechnique, 2000; 50(1): 83–8.
  • Zhu D-Y, Qian QH, Lee CF. Active and passive critical slip fields for cohesionless soils and calculation of lateral earth pressures. Geotechnique, 2001; 51(5): 407–23.
  • Goel S, Patra NR. Effect of Arching on Active Earth Pressure for Rigid Retaining Walls Considering Translation Mode. International Journal of Geomechanics,ASCE, 2008; 8(2): 123–33.
  • Khosravi MH, Pipatpongsa T, Takemura. Experimental analysis of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls under translation mode. Geotechnique. 2003; 63(12):1020–8.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.