Total views : 198

The Privacy Right and Right to be Forgotten: the Malaysian Perspectives

Affiliations

  • Department of Legal Practice, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Ahmad Ibrahim Kuliyyah of Laws,Jalan Gombak, Kuala Lumpur – 53100, Malaysia

Abstract


Privacy right is the fundamental right recognised by the 1948 United Nation Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR), the International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and in many other international and regional treaties. While right to be forgotten (RTBF) was recognised in 2014 when the European Court of Justice (EUCJ) made a decision in the case of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González. The RTBF allows the Internet users to erase any information about themselves such as their personal information by making request to the Internet Service Provider or data processor to remove the information from the websites. Following the above court decision, many have argued that it shall not be implemented while some others have agreed to this new concept of right under the privacy law. The issue arises when certain countries such as Malaysia does not have a specific privacy law to adopt and implement such right. Hence, this paper examines the right to privacy and its position in Malaysia this paper examines the right to privacy and its position in Malaysia, its relevancy to right to be forgotten and whether RTBF shall be adopted in Malaysia. For background information reference is made to the privacy laws and the position of RTBF in few other countries.

Keywords

Data Protection, Privacy, Personal Information, Right To Be Forgotten.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 224)

References


  • Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC). Serious Invasion of Privacy in Digital Era. The Australian Law Reform Commission’s Final Report 123; 2014 Sep 3.
  • Calcutt D. Report of the committee on privacy and related matters. H. M. S. O, London. 1990 Jun; Cm 1102:7.
  • Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). The meaning of privacy [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2008 Aug 12]. Available from: www.alrc.gov.au/publications/1.../meaning-priva.
  • Ismail, Noriswandi, Cieh, Edwin Lee Yong editors. Beyond data protection: strategic case studies and practical guidance.London: Springer; 2013.
  • Warren S, Brandeis L. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review. 1890; 4:193.
  • Tee, Lake K, Ahmad SSS editors. Throwing Privacy Out of the Window. In ICT Its Impact on Selected Areas of the Law. Kuala Lumpur: University Malaya Press; 2006.
  • Bedi, Rashvinjeet S. Balcony sex couple may be charged for gross indecency, says lawyer, the star [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 May 4]. Available from: www.thestar.com.
  • Ibid
  • Munar AM. Digital exhibitionism: the age of exposure.Culture Unbound. 2010; 2:401–22.
  • Osman FY, Ab. Rahim NZ. Self-disclosure and social network sites user’s awareness. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems; 2011 Nov 23–24. p. 1–6.
  • Brady N. Does the right of erasure pose a bigger threat than the right to be forgotten? [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 10]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/ media-network/media-network-blog/2014/jul/10/rightforgottengoogle-data-protection.
  • Hudson L. How to protect privacy while using pokemon go and other Apps. The New York Times; 2016 Jul 12.
  • Auslooas J. The right to be forgotten-worth remembering.Computer Law and Security Review. 2012; 28(2):143–52.
  • Penn WD. Background: The Right to be Forgotten in National and Regional Contexts. IFLA; 2015. p. 1–4.
  • King G. EU ‘right to be forgotten’ ruling will corrupt history [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Jun 4]. Available from: https:// cpj.org/blog/2014/06/eu-right-to-be-forgotten-ruling-willcorrupthisto.php.
  • Rodionova Z. EU data protection regulation passes in Brussels giving citizens right to be forgotten online [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Apr 14]. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/ european-union-s-general-data-protection-regulationprivacyfacebook-data-eu-law-online-web-a6984101.html.
  • Arthur, Charles. (June 27, 2014). Google removing ‘right to be forgotten’ search links in Europe [Internet].2014 [cited 2014 Jun 27]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/26/google-removing-right-tobeforgotten-links.
  • King G. EU ‘right to be forgotten’ ruling will corrupt history [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Jun 4]. Available from: https:// cpj.org/blog/2014/06/eu-right-to-be-forgotten-ruling-willcorrupthisto.php.
  • Zhoa Y. Cyber law in Hong Kong. Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer Law and Business; 2011. p. 139.
  • Jonathan, Rosenoer. Cyber law the law of the internet. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
  • Thousands of Britons seek ‘right to be forgotten’ [Internet].2014 [cited 2014 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-29586700.
  • Tippman S, Powles J. Google accidentally reveals data on ‘right to be forgotten’ requests [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Jul 14]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/ technology/2015/jul/14/google-accidentally-reveals-righttobe-forgotten-requests.
  • Bradshaw J. Google ruling puts Europe’s right to be forgotten law back in focus [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 May 23].Available from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/reportonbusiness/international-business/european-business/ google-ruling-puts-europes-right-to-be-forgotten-lawbackin-focus/article30120998/.
  • Fioretti J. France fines Google over the ‘right to be forgotten’ [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Mar 24]. Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-google-france-privacyidUSKCN0WQ1WX.
  • Gibbs S. Google to extend ‘right to be forgotten’ to all its domains accessed in EU [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/ technology/2016/feb/11/google-extend-right-to-be-forgottengooglecom.
  • Fioretti J. France order Microsoft to stop collecting excessive user data [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 20].Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-dataprotectionmicrosoftfrance-idUSKCN10029C.
  • Reld B. Does the U.S. need a legal right to be forgotten?[Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Apr 11]. Available from: http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-reid/does-the-us-need-alegal_ b_9659746.html.
  • Roberts JJ. The right to be forgotten from Google? Forget it, says U.S. crowd [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Mar 12].Available from: http://fortune.com/2015/03/12/the-righttobe-forgotten-from-google-forget-it-says-u-s-crowd/.
  • Reld B. Does the U.S. need a legal right to be forgotten?[Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Apr 11]. Available from: http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-reid/does-the-us-need-alegal_ b_9659746.html.
  • TechnoLlama. UK Court of Appeal confirms tort of privacy in Google v Vidal-Hall [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Apr 2]. Available from: http://www.technollama.co.uk/ uk-court-of-appeals-confirms-tort-of-privacy-in-googlevvidal-hall.
  • Online privacy law: United Kingdom [Internet]. 2012 [updated 2015 Jun 5; cited 2012 Jun]. Available from: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/online-privacy-law/uk.php.
  • Technology. Google ordered to remove news links by UK authority [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34015894.
  • Thousands of Britons seek ‘right to be forgotten’ [Internet].2014 [cited 2014 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-29586700.
  • Man loses ‘right to be forgotten’ Google court bid [Internet].2015 [cited 2015 Jul 30]. Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-33706475.
  • The Hon. Michael Kirby AC CMG. The long and sorry story of privacy protection in Australia –why New South Wales should lead [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 May 2].Available from: www.ipc.nsw.gov.au/hon-micheal-kirbyspeechpam-2016.
  • Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). Serious invasion of privacy in digital era (DP80) [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Mar 31]. Available from: http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/serious-invasions-privacy-dp-80.
  • Bayliss–McCulloch J. Does Australia need a “right to be forgotten”?. Communications Law Bulletin. 2014 Mar; 33(1):7–11.
  • Masnick M. Right to be forgotten now lives in Australia: court says Google is the ‘publisher’ of material it links to [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 28]. Available from: https:// www.techdirt.com/articles/20151028/09424232657/ right-to-be-forgotten-now-lives-australia-court-saysgoogleis-publisher-material-it-links-to.shtml.
  • Douglas M. Google expands the ‘right to be forgotten’, but Australia doesn’t need it [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Mar 7]. Available from: http://theconversation.com/ google-expands-the-right-to-be-forgotten-but-australiadoesntneed-it-54887.
  • McCurry J. Japan recognizes ‘right to be forgotten’ of man convicted of child sex offences [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/ technology/2016/mar/01/japan-recognises-right-to-beforgottenof-man-convicted-of-child-sex-offences.
  • Miyashita H. Right to be forgotten in Japan [Internet]. Year [cited]. Available from: https://www.rebootcommunications.com/wp-content/uploads/.../Hiroshi-Miyashita.pdf.
  • Kyodo. Tokyo High Court overturns man’s ‘right to be forgotten’ [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 13]. Available from:http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/07/13/national/ crime-legal/tokyo-high-court-overturns-mans-right-forgotten/#.WJlV8NJ961s.
  • Wilkiams PJ. The Right to Be Forgotten Image a Camera at a Human Face Forever [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Oct 6].Available from: https://www.thenation.com/article/rightbeforgotten/.
  • Sarpu B. Embarassing Photo? Criminal Records Negative Press? Europe’s Right to be Forgotten May Delink Those Stories But Without a Battle From Google Inc [Internet].2014 [cited 2014 Oct 2]. Available from: http://www.jhtl.org/blog/embarrassing-photo-criminal-record-negativepresseuropes-right-to-be-forgotten-may-delink-thosestoriesbut-not-without-a-battle-from-google-inc/.
  • The Sun Daily. MCMC requests Google block Alvin Tan’s Youtube account: Jailani [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Apr 23]. Available from: www.thesundaily.my/news/1394274.
  • Zurairi AR. Google Malaysia keeps mum on Putrajaya’s request to block ‘false info’ [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Aug 17]. Available from: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/ malaysia/article/google-malaysia-keeps-mum-on-putrajayasrequest-to-block-false-info#sthash.Jut3zvWP.dpuf.
  • International Press Institute. Malaysia blocks Medium for not complying with request to remove investigative news story [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 27]. Available from: ontheline.freemedia.at/malaysia-blocks-medium-for-notcomplyingwith-request-to-r.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.