Total views : 609

Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Rights Awareness: A Research Agenda


  • Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
  • Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia Skudai, Johor, Malaysia


Objective: This study incorporates the literature on Corporate Social Responsibility and consumerism, with particular emphasis on the issue of consumer rights awareness, and its potential effect on consumers’ reaction towards CSR. Methods/ Statistical Analysis: The paper utilizes a literature review as a basis for the research conclusions, as well as to develop the research framework. Findings: The study highlights suggestions from previous researches, which points to the existence of a historical, as well as contemporary link between increased consumer rights awareness, and adoption of CSR by companies. Specifically, the paper buttresses its arguments with some insights from Nigeria, with particular emphasis on the banking and telecommunications sectors, which are have witnessed increased CSR adoption in the country, due to increased agitations from customers, regarding the need for increased ethical behavior and observance of consumer rights by the companies. Applications/Improvements: The study develops a research model, along with relevant research propositions that could guide future research endeavors aimed at empirically ascertaining the relationship between consumerism and CSR.


Consumer Perceptions, Consumerism/Consumer Rights Awareness, Corporate Social Responsibility, Nigeria.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 565)


  • Carroll AB. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review. 1979, 4(4):497–505.
  • Gupta S. Strategic dimensions of corporate image, corporate ability and corporate social responsibility as sources of competitive advantage via differentiation. (PhD Thesis). Temple University. ProQuest Digital Dissertations database; 2002.
  • Maignan I, Ferrell OC, Hult GTM. Corporate citizenship, cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1999; 27:455–69.
  • Bhattacharya CB, Sen S. Doing better at doing good, when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review. 2004; 47:9–24.
  • Pérez A, García de losSalmones M, Rodríguez del Bosque I. The effect of corporate associations on consumer behaviour. European Journal of Marketing. 2013; 47(1/2):218–38.
  • Carvalho SW, Sen S, de Oliveira Mota, M, de Lima RC. Consumer reactions to CSR, A Brazilian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010; 91(2):291–310.
  • Folkes V, Kamins M. Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1999; 8(3):243–59.
  • Walsh G, Bartikowski B. Exploring corporate ability and social responsibility associations as antecedents of customer satisfaction cross-culturally. Journal of Business Research. 2013; 66(8):989–95
  • Agbonifoh BA, Edoreh PE. Consumer awareness and complaining behavior. European Journal of Marketing. 1986; 20(7):43–9.
  • Bello KB, Suleiman JBA, Danjuma I. Perspectives on consumerism and consumer protection act in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management. 2012; 4(10):72–8.
  • Alsmadi S, Khizindar T. Consumers’ perceptions of consumer rights in Jordan. International Journal of Commerce and Management. 2015; 25(4):512–30.
  • Alsmadi SA, Alnawas I. Consumer rights today, Are they in business or out of business? International Journal of Marketing Studies. 2012; 4(1):159–67.
  • Kotler P. What consumerism means for marketers. Harvard Business Review. 1972; 3:48–57.
  • Ikejiaku BV. Consideration of ethical and legal aspects of corporate social responsibility, the issue of multi-national corporations and sustainable development. Nordic Journal of Commercial Law. 2012; 1:1–32.
  • Mohr LA, Webb DJ, Harris, KE. Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2001; 35(1):45–72.
  • Garriga E, Melé D. Corporate social responsibility theories, mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004; 53:51–71.
  • Pride W, Ferrell OC. Marketing. 14th (edn)., Houghton Mifflin Co: New York; 2008.
  • Öberseder M, Schlegelmilch BB, Murphy PE. CSR practices and consumer perceptions. Journal of Business Research. 2013; 66(10):1839–51.
  • Freeman RE. Strategic management, A stakeholder approach. Boston, Pitman; 1984.
  • Alvarado-Herrera A, Bigne E, Aldas-Manzano J, Curras-Perez R. A scale for measuring consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility following the sustainable development paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics; 2015. p. 1–20.
  • Babatunde KA, Akinboboye S. Corporate social responsibility effect on consumer patronage-management perspective, Case study of a telecommunication company in Nigeria. Journal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication. 2013; 29(1):55–71.
  • Peloza J, Shang J. How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2010; 39(1):117–35.
  • Christopher E, Luke M. The pivotal role of corporate social responsibility perception on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Management Research. 2013; 2:47–55.
  • Galbreath J. The benefits of corporate social responsibility, an empirical study. Paper presented at the ANZAM 22nd annual conference, Auckland; 2008. p. 1–25.
  • Hussain A. Customers’ perception of CSR, and their response to socially responsible businesses, evidence from Pakistan. Management and Administrative Sciences Review. 2013; 2(3):268–80.
  • Podnar K, Golob U. CSR expectations, the focus of corporate marketing. Corporate Communications. 2007; 12(4):326–40.
  • Carroll AB. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility, toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1991; (34):39–48.
  • Armstron, G, Kotler PH. Marketing, an Introduction. 11th (edn). Pearson - Prentice-Hall: New Jersy; 2013.
  • Perreault W, McCarthy EJ. Basic marketing, a global managerial approach. 14th (edn)., McGraw – Hill Inc: Irvin, New York; 2002.
  • Solaiman M, Yasmin S, Haque A. Issues of consumerism in Bangladesh, Present status and challenges. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2012 Mar; 2(3):1–7.
  • Yani-de-Soriano M, Slater, S. Revisiting Drucker’s theory, has consumerism led to the overuse of marketing? Journal of Management History. 2009, 15(4):452 – 66.
  • Babaoğul, M, Şener A, Buğday EB. A study on the level of awareness of consumer protection and consumer rights, a Turkish sample. The International Journal of the Humanities. 2011; 8(11):258–72.
  • Donoghue S, De Klerk HM. The right to be heard and to be understood, a conceptual framework for consumer protection in emerging economies. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2009; 33(1):456–67.
  • Ibarra VC, Revilla CD. Consumers’ awareness on their eight basic rights, a comparative study of Filipinos in the Philippines and Guam. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research. 2014; 7(2):65–78.
  • Verhage BJ. Knowing your rights, a cross-cultural study. European Journal of Marketing. 1987; 21(5):70–5.
  • Zhao W, Othman M. The influence of knowledge of consumer protection and perception of marketing factors on consumer complaint behaviors, a study of malaysian consumers. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2010; 1(9):27–35.
  • Bhuian SN, Al-Enazi EA. Perceived consumer power and consumer complaint behavior, the direct and indirect influences of consumer awareness of their rights. Paper presented at, The 12th International Decision Sciences Institute & the 18th Asia Pacific DSI Conference, Bali, Indonesia, 2013 July 9–13; 2013. p. 1–12.
  • Makanyeza C. Consumer awareness, ethnocentrism and loyalty, an integrative model. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2015; 27(2):167–83.
  • Ishak S, Zabil NFM. Impact of consumer awareness and knowledge to consumer effective behavior. Asian Social Science. 2012; 8(13):108–14.
  • Gok G, Ozen U, Yoruk E. Knowledge and attitudes of university students on consumer rights. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 106, 1656–68.
  • Henry PC. How mainstream consumers think about consumer rights and responsibilities. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010; 37(4):670–87.
  • Azmat F, Ha H. Corporate social responsibility, customer trust, and loyalty—perspectives from a developing country. Thunderbird International Business Review. 2013; 55(3):253–70.
  • Carrigan M, Attalla A. The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2001; 18(7):560–78.
  • Castaldo S, Perrini F. Corporate social responsibility, trust management and value creation. Paper presented at the 20th EGOS Colloquium, The Organization as a Set of Dynamic Relationships, Ljubljana University, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2004.
  • Yusoff SSA, Isa SM, Aziz AA, Chin OT. Corporate responsibility via Malaysian contract law, a concern for consumer protection. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2012; 20(1):227–38.
  • Obadare E. Playing politics with the mobile phone in Nigeria, civil society, big business and the state. Review of African Political Economy. 2006; 33(107):93–111.
  • Smith NC. Corporate social responsibility, not whether, but how. Center for Marketing Working Paper Series. 2003; l(3):701.
  • Smith NC. Consumers as drivers of corporate responsibility. Crane AMA, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D, editors. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford. Oxford University Press; 2007.
  • Becker-Olsen KL, Cudmore BA, Hill RP. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research. 2006; 59(1):46–53.
  • Klein J, Smith NC, John A. Why we boycott, Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing. 2004 Jul; 68:92–109.
  • Brown TJ, Dacin PA. The company and the product, corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing. 1997; 61(1):68–84.
  • Ramasamy B, Yeung M. Chinese consumers’ perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics. 2009; 88(1):119–32.
  • Mordi C, Opeyemi IS, Tonbara M, Ojo IS. Corporate social responsibility and the legal regulation in Nigeria. Economic Insights-Trends and Challenges. 2012; 64(1):1–8
  • Osemene O. Corporate social responsibility practices in mobile tele-communications industry in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management. 2012; 4(8):149–59.
  • Raimi L, Aljadani A, Fadipe A, Adeleke I. How adequate and efficient are regulations on corporate social responsibility and social reporting? Evidence from the Nigeria telecommunication industry. Asian Journal of Empirical Research. 2014; 4(6):315–34.
  • Amaeshi KM, Adi BC, Ogbechie C, Amao OO. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria, western mimicry or indigenous practices? Nottingham, UK, International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, the Nottingham University Business School; 2006.
  • Helg A. Corporate social responsibility from a Nigerian perspective (Master Thesis). VID GOTEBORGS UNIVERSITET; 2007.
  • Adeyanju OD. An assessment of the impact of corporate social responsibility on Nigerian society, the examples of banking and communication industries. Universal Journal of Marketing and Business Research. 2012; 1(1):17–43.
  • Nigerian Communications Commission. Trends in telecommunications markets in Nigeria 2003–2004. Corporate planning and Research Department Team. NCC; 2005.
  • Smith NC. Changes in corporate practices in response to public interest adocacy and actions, the role of consumer boycotts and socially responsible corporate social responsibility. Centre for Marketing Working Paper. London, London Business School; 2000.
  • Maignan I. Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibilities, a cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics. 2001; 30(1):57–72.
  • Creyer EH, Ross WT. The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention, do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1997; 14(6):421–32.
  • Murray KB, Vogel CM. Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm, financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research. 1997; 38(2):141–59.
  • Su L, Huang S, Van der Veen R, Chen X. Corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation, customer emotions and behavioral intentions, a structural equation modelling analysis. Journal of China Tourism Research. 2014; 10:511–29.
  • Feldman MP, Vasquez‐Parraga AZ. Consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2013; 30(2):100–11.
  • Boulstridge E, Carrigan M. Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude—behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management. 2000; 4(4):355–68.
  • Singh J, Gracia de losSalmones - Sanchez MDMG, del Bosque IR. Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets, a cross-cultural evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008; 80(3):597–611.
  • Casado-Díaz AB, Nicolau-Gonzálbez JL, Ruiz-Moreno F, Sellers-Rubio R. The differentiated effects of CSR actions in the service industry. Journal of Services Marketing. 2014; 28(7):558–65.
  • Sen S, Bhattacharya CB. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of marketing Research. 2001; 38(2):225–43.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.