Total views : 215

Measurement Framework for the Acceptance of Internet of Things Product


  • Department of Business Administration, Cheongju University, 298 Daesungro, Cheongwongu, Cheongju,Chungbuk, 28503, Korea


Objectives: This research paper aims to develop a measurement framework for the acceptance factors of Internet of Things (IoT) products. Methods/Statistical Analysis: A research model was constructed. Data from 321 Korean IoT users were gathered and statistically processed to derive several factors affecting on acceptance of IoT product. For that purpose we administrated empirical factor analysis. As the result 4 factors were derived. These factors contain 4 measured variables each. Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) method was applied for the analysis of the weight of the factors for acceptance of IoT products. Findings: The result of this paper showed that the factors, like technical issues, personal characters, environmental factors, and cost factor affect the users on adoption of IoT products. In this paper, 2 steps of survey were carried out. In the first survey, 4 factors for the acceptance of IoT products were derived. In the 2nd survey, the weight of each factor was analyzed by the pair-wise comparison performed by 6 experts in the field of IoT. The level of significance of each factor was calculated. As the result, “Cost of IoT” is the most significant factor for the acceptance of IoT product. The factor “User character” is second significant factor of all and this means that the “User character” is also very important factor for decision to use of IoT product. And the next coming factor is “Environment issues”. “Technique issues” is 4th factor. The 4th place means that this factor seems important but less influential than other 3 factors in accepting IoT product. The second survey has been conducted to determine the weight of each variable. Improvements/Applications: The result of this paper could be the important reference to the IoT product companies in planning their business strategies and marketing their IoT products in Korea.


Acceptance Factor; Analytic Hierarchical Process; Data Analysis, Factor Analysis; Internet of Things.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 227)


  • Lingling G, Xuesong B. A Unified Perspective on the Factors Influencing User Acceptance of Internet of Things Technology, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.2013; 26(2):211−31.
  • Venkatesh V, Thong J, Xu X. User Acceptance and use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology, MIS Quarterly. 2013; 36(1):157−78.
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin. 1988; 103(3):411−23.
  • Brody P, Pureswaran V. The Next Digital Gold Rush: How the Internet of Things will Create Liquid, Transparent Markets, Strategy and Leadership. 2015; 43(1):36−41.
  • GubbiJ, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M. Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Direction, Future Computer Systems. 2013; 29(7):1645−60.
  • ABI Research. Date Accessed: 2016. Available at: https://
  • Chong AYL, Chan FT, Ooi KB. Predicting user Decisions to Adopt Mobile Commerce: Cross Country Empirical Examination between China and Malaysia, Decision Support Systems. 2012; 53(1):34−43.
  • Al-Ajam AS, Nor KM. Internet Banking Adoption: Integrating Technology Acceptance Modeland Trust, European Journal of Business and Management. 2013; 5(3):207−15.
  • Li XJ, Wang D. Architecture and Existing Applications for Internet of Things, Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013; 347(1):3317−21.
  • Shang X, Zhang R, Chen Y. Internet of Things (IOT) Service Architecture and its Application in E-Commerce, Journal of Electronic Commerce Organizations. 2012; 10(3):44−55.
  • Internet of Things Holds Promise, But Sparks Privacy Concerns. Date Accessed: 2016. Available at: internet-of-things-hold-promise-but-sparks-privacyconcerns/ a-15911207-1.
  • Ding W. Study of Smart Warehouse Management System Based on the IoT. In: Du. Z. (Ed.), Intelligence Computation and Evolutionary, Springer, Berlin. 2013, p. 203−7.
  • Won-shik Na, Seok-Hoon Kim, An Efficient Data Forwarding Scheme for Internet of Things in Wi-Fi Networks, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(8):112−7.
  • Fernandez P. Through the Looking Glass: Thinking Through the Internet of Things. Library Hi Tech News.2015; (5):4−7.
  • Schierz PG, Schilke O, Wirtz BW. Understanding user Acceptance of Mobile Payment Service: An Empirical Analysis, Electronic Research and Applications. 2014; 9(3): 209−16.
  • Usha Devi G, Vishnu Balan E, Priyan MK, Gokulnath C.Mutual Authentication Scheme for IoT Application, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(27):1−5.
  • Hancke G, Markantonakis K, Mayes K. Security Challenges for User-Oriented RFID Applications within the Internet of Things, Journal of Internet Technology. 2010; 11(3):307−13.
  • Uckelmann D, Harrison M, Michaelles F. An Architectural Approach toward the Future Internet of Things, Architecting the Internet of Things, Springer Berlin: 2011.
  • Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mc Grow Hill: USA; 1980.
  • Wikipedia, Internet of Things. Date Accessed: 2015.Available at: http://en.wikipedia/wiki/Internet_of_things.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.