Total views : 279

Changing Paradigm in Trade Theories: A Review and Future Research Agenda

Affiliations

  • Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International University, Bengaluru - 560100, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Objectives: The objectives of the study were to understand the evolution of trade theories and their application across nations over a period of time and to provide future direction of research for international trade. Methods/Statistical Analysis: To meet the objectives, the study undertook a comprehensive review of literature to bring together works of different researchers in the area of international trade. It summarizes the past theories and applications with the research advancements over the years. Findings: The study finds that over the years, research in international trade has evolved with new forms of models coming into existence. Many trade theories like absolute advantage, comparative advantage, factor endowment, factor price equalization, gravity model etc. have emerged and applied. At the same time, the trade environment across the developed and developing countries has metamorphosed with the advent of World Trade Organization and multiple trade blocs. Several factors have significantly gained importance, thus leading to a need of new dimensions in trade research. Conclusion/Improvements: The study proposes development of trade models which could incorporate pace of technological development and innovation, economic shocks like financial crisis, Brexit etc. and changes in global value chains. It also highlights the importance of future research in trade in services.

Keywords

Gravity Model, International Trade, Trade Models, Trade Theories.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 377)

References


  • UNCTAD. Key statistics and trends in international trade. United Nations Publication. Geneva, Switzerland; 2015.
  • Bastable CF. The theory of international trade. MacMillan and Co. Ltd., London; 1917.
  • Viner J. Studies in the theory of international trade. Harper and Brothers Publishers. New York; 1937.
  • Grampp WD. The liberal elements in English mercantilism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1952:465–501.
  • Chalk AF. Natural law and the rise of economic individualism in England. The Journal of Political Economy.1951:332–347.
  • Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations. New York. Bantam Dell; 1776, 2003ed.
  • Ricardo D. On The principles of political economy and taxation. Kitchener, Batoche Books. 1817.
  • MacDougall GDA. British and american exports: A Study Suggested by the Theory of Comparative Costs. Part I. The Economic Journal. 1951:697–724.
  • MacDougall G. D. A. British and American Exports: A Study Suggested by the Theory of Comparative Costs. Part II. The Economic Journal. 1952:487–521.
  • Stern RM. British and american productivity and comparative costs in international trade. Oxford Economic Papers.1962:275–296.
  • Robinson J. Prelude to a critique of economic theory. Oxford Economic Papers. 1961; 13(1):53–58.
  • Ohlin B. Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA: 1933.
  • Leontief W. Factor Proportions and the Structure of American Trade: Further Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1956: 386-407.
  • Bowen HP, Leamer EE, and Sveikauskas L. Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory. The American Economic Review. 1987:791–809.
  • Samuelson PA. International trade and the equalization of factor prices. The Economic Journal. 1948:163–184.
  • Golub SS, and Hsieh CT. Classical ricardian theory of comparative advantage revisited. Review of International Economics. 2000; 8(2):221–234.
  • Linder Staffan Burenstam. An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York. 1961.
  • Johnson H. Review of 'An Essay on Trade and Transformation' by Staffan Burenstam-Linder. Economica.1964;31:86–90.
  • Hirsch Z.and Lev B. Trade and Per Capita Income Differentials: A Test of the Burenstam-Linder Hypothesis. World Development. 1973;1(9):11–17.
  • Helpman E. and P. Krugman. Market Structure and International Trade. MIT Press. 1985.
  • Krugman P. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. The American Economic Review.1980; 70:950–959.
  • Krugman P. Increasing Returns to Scale, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Journal of International Economics, IX (1979). 1981: 469–79. Intra-industry Specialization and the Gains from Trade," Journal of Political Economy. 1981; 89:959–73.
  • Helpman E. Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese and international economies. 1987; 1(1):62–81.
  • Eaton J. and Kortum S. Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica. 2002:1741–1779.
  • Chaney T. Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. The American Economic Review. 2008; 98(4):1707–1721.
  • Ciuriak D, Lapham B, Wolfe R, Collins-Williams T. and Curtis JM. New-new Trade Policy (No. 1263). Queen's Economics Department Working Paper. 2011.
  • Tinbergen J. An analysis of world trade flows in shaping the world Economy:Suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund. New York.1962.
  • Bergstrand JH. The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The review of economics and statistics. 1985:474–481.
  • Eichengreen B. and Irwin Douglas A. The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In Frankel, J. A. The Regionalization of the World Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.1998. p. 33–62.
  • Mayer T. and Zignago M. Market Access in Global and Regional Trade.CEPII Working Paper 2, CEPII. 2005.
  • Leitao. Nuno Carlos.(2010). The gravity model and United States’ Trade. European Journal of Economics. Finance and Administrative Services. 21. 92–100.
  • McCallum J. National borders matter: Canada-us regional trade patterns; American Economic Review .1995; 85:615–623.
  • Eichengreen B, Rhee Y. and Tong H. China and the Exports of Other Asian Countries. Review of World Economics.2007; 143(2):201–226.
  • Panda R, Sethi M. and Kumaran M. A study of bilateral trade flows of China and India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 9(15):1–7.
  • Rose AK. Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review.2002.
  • Lee JW. and Park I. Free Trade Areas in East Asia: Discriminatory or Non-discriminatory? World Economy.2005; 28(1):21–48.
  • Martinez-Zarzoso I. and Nowak-Lehmann F. Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to Mercosur-European Union Trade Flows. Journal of Applied Economics.2003; 2(2):291–316.
  • Carrère C. Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review.2006; 50(2):223–247.
  • Zidi A. and Dhifallah SM. Trade Creation and Trade Diversion between Tunisia and EU: Analysis by Gravity Model. International Journal of Economics and Finance.2013; 5(5): 131–147.
  • Kabir M.and Salim R. Can gravity model explain BIMSTEC’s Trade? Journal of Economic Integration.2010; 25(1):144–166.
  • Brülhart M. Trading Places: Industrial Specialization in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 1998; 36(3):319–346.
  • Hufbauer G. The impact of national characteristics and technology on the commodity composition of trade in manufactured goods. In The Technology Factor in International Trade (p. 145–231). National Bureau of Economic Research.1970.
  • Nadiri MI. Innovations and technological spillovers (No. w4423). National Bureau of Economic Research.1993.
  • Harrigan J. Cross-Country comparisons of industry total factor productivity: Theory and Evidence (No. 9734). Federal Reserve Bank of New York.1997.
  • Keller W. Do trade patterns and technology flows affect productivity growth? World Bank Economic Review.2000; 14:17–47.
  • Keller W. International technology diffusion. NBER Working Paper No. 8573.2001.
  • WTO. International trade statistics. World Trade Organization Publication.www.wto.org/statistics. 2015.
  • Kimura F. and Lee HH. The Gravity Equation in International Trade in Services. Review of World Economics.2006; 142(1):92–121.
  • Ceglowski J. Does Gravity Matter in a Service Economy?Review of World Economics.2006; 142(2):307–329.
  • Tharakan PKM, Van Beveren I. and Van Ourti. T. Determinants of India's Software Exports and Goods Exports. Review of Economics and Statistics.2005; 87(4):776–780.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.