Total views : 180

Performance Analysis of Joint-Ventured Life Insurance Compaines in China from Cultural Difference Perspective


  • Department of International Business, Chung-Buk National University, Korea


Objectives: International business study tests the way national culture effects life insurance companies. Culture tends to have a strong influence on individual behavior under of uncertainty and ambiguity. Methods/Statistical Analysis: To proxy for national culture dimensions we choose to adopt the Hofstede and GLOBE (Practice/Value) project cultural dimension and collect data across 28 joint-ventured life insurance companies in China from 2004–2013 periods. Findings: According to the study, national cultural differences showed greater effect on financial performance of the life insures than organizational cultural difference and positive or negative effect in the financial performance of the joint-ventured life insurance companies in accordance with each dimension of cultural distance. The results are strongly support, even after controlling for environmental, life insure-specific, economic variable. Cultural factors play as a strong explanatory variable and impose more influences on financial performance during international investment cooperation. Hofstede cultural dimensions effect on earned premium income is statically significant [F=12.798***, β=0.039, T=2.916*]. The finding is interesting in that the higher individualism and long-term orientation, lower masculinity that foreign companies are, the more positive effect on financial performance that foreign company accomplish. GLOBE (Practice) cultural dimension effect on earned premium income is statically insignificant [F=11.838***, β=1.863, T=2.110]. Therefore the higher in In-group collectivism and Performance-orientation those foreign companies are, the more positive effects on financial performance that foreign companies accomplish. GLOBE (Value) cultural dimension effect on earned premium income is statically insignificant [F=13.123***, β=2.919, T=3.142**]. Therefore, the higher in Institutional-collectivism and Gender-egalitarianism those foreign companies are the more positive effects on financial performance that foreign companies accomplish. The lower performance-orientation that foreign companies are, the more negative effects on financial performance that foreign companies accomplish. Improvements/Applications: Therefore it is recommended to take cultural factors into consideration for firm`s future international investment cooperation in China.


Cultural Difference, Financial Performance Joint Venture, Life Insurance Companies.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 155)


  • King DR, Dalton DR, Daily CM, Covin JG. Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Journal of Strategic Management. 2004; 25(2):187-200.
  • Lin X, Germain R. Sustaining satisfactory joint venture relationships : The role of conflict resolution strategy. Journal of International Business Studies. 1998; 29(1):79-96.
  • Li JK, Qian LG. Does culture affect behavior and performance of firms: The case of joint ventures in china. Journal of International Business Studies. 2001; 32(1):115-31.
  • Managing culture and human resources in mergers and acquisitions. Available from: resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/pages/ mergersandacquisitions.aspx.
  • Sarala RM, Varra E. Cultural difference, convergence and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies. 2010; 41(8):1365-90.
  • Steigner T, Sutton NK. How does national culture impact internalization benefits in cross-border mergers and acquisitions?The Financial Review. 201; 46(1):103-25.
  • Caves RE, Crookell JH, Killing P. The imperfect market for technology licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 1983; 45(3):249-67.
  • Barkema HG. Foreign entry, cultural barriers and learning.Journal of Strategic Management. 1996; 17(2):151-66.
  • Stahl GK, Voigt A. Meta-analysises of the performance implications of cultural differences in mergers and acquisitions.ACAD Manage. 2004; 1:11-5.
  • Chen H M H. An empirical analysis of factors explaining foreign joint venture performance in china. Journal of Business Research. 1996: 35(2):165-73.
  • Morosini P, Shane S, Singh H. National cultural distance and cross border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies. 1998; 29(1):137-58.
  • Datta DK, Puia G. Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in U.S. acquiring firms.Management International Review. 1995; 35(4):337-59.
  • Bakema HG, Vermeulen F. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective.ACAD Manage. 1998; 41(1):7-26.
  • Leung K, Bhagat RS, Buchan NR, Erez M, Gibson CB.Culture and international business: Recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies. 2005; 36(4):357-78.
  • Bjorkman I, Stahl GK, Varra E. Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies. 2007; 38(4):658-72.
  • Stahl GK, Voigt A. Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A Tentative model and examination.Organization Science. 2008; 19(1):160-76.
  • Teerikangans S, Very P. The culture performance relationship in M and A: From Yes/ No to How. British Journal of Management. 2006; 17(S1):31-48.
  • Chui ACW, Kwok CCY. National culture and life insurance consumption. Journal of International Business Studies.2008; 39(1):88-101.
  • Chui ACW, Kwok CCY. Cultural practice and life insurance consumption : An international analysis using GLOBE score. Journal of Multinational Financial Management.2009; 19(4):273-90.
  • Forstmann S. Managing cultural differences in crosscultural mergers and acquisitions. Cultural dimensions of International Mergers and acquisitions. Berlin and NewYork: Walter de Gruyter; 1998. p. 57-83.
  • Bruner R. Where MandA pays and where it strays : A survey of the research. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance.2004; 16(4):63-76.
  • Barney JB. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten year retrospective on the resource-based view.Journal of Management. 2001; 27(6):643-50.
  • Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations.2nd ed. Beverly Hills. CA: Sage; 2001.
  • House et al. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theries across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business. 2002; 37(1):3-10.
  • Javidan M, House RJ. Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics. 2001; 29:289-305.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.