Total views : 235

Comparision of Blur Detection and Segmentation Techniques


  • Department of IT, VIT University, Vellore - 632014, Tamil Nadu, India


Objectives: Increasing the quality of the captured image by using different blur detection techniques and making the picture into pixels to redefine the image. Distortion identification based image integrity and verity evaluation which organizes natural scene data of image wavelet co-efficient. Methods/Statistical Analysis: To improve image quality, the different blur detection techniques used in this paper are namely blind image de-convolution, two-stage image segmentation, edge sharpness analysis, non-reference NR block, no directional high frequency. According to these techniques and their procedures, it is estimated that blind image de-convolution is best because it reduces the need for future engineering and identifies the blur type for the mixed input of image for various parameters. Findings: Images are taken around many parts and are used to store and show the information which is precise useful. But many periods the quality of the pictures that are captured is not well-intentioned. The blur detection is initiate helpful in the real life applications and are established in the areas of image segmentation, image restoration. The growth of the blur detection practices have improved the various systems to remove the blur or un-focused part from the image which is owed to imperfection of the camera or due to the de-focus of the gesture of the portion, extreme strength of light. This paper suggests the sharpness, quality image that are in out-of-focus areas. Here this paper proposes the blind image de-convolution method is finest to detect the blur image in the numerous aspects of the sections and the parameters. The outcomes of the segmentation and blur detection practices are compared based on the computational time, cost and the advantages and disadvantages that are projected in the practices. The blur image detection procedures used in this paper are Blind image de-convolution, Two stage image segmentation method,, Non-reference (NR) block, Low directional high frequency energy (for motion blur), edge sharpness analysis. Application/Improvements: Blur detection and segmentation techniques is used to eliminate blur from image source and take out the just right quality of the image using techniques that is proposed in this paper. The comparison made in this paper shows that blur detection techniques which has low computational time and Root Mean Square Error that is frequently used to calculate the differences between pixel value of the image.


Blind Image De-convolution, Edge Sharpness Analysis, Image Segmentation, Low Directional High Frequency Energy (For Motion Blur), Non-reference (NR) Block, Two Stage Image Segmentation Method.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 189)


  • Achanta R, Hemami S, Estrada F, Susstrunk S. Frequencytuned salient region detection. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR); 2009 Jun. p. 1597–604.
  • Adorf H.M. Towards HST restoration with a space-variant PSF, cosmic rays and other missing data. Proc Restoration HST Images Spectra-II. 1994; 1:72–8.
  • Ahonen T, Hadid A, Pietikainen M. Face description with local binary patterns: Application to face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Dec; 28(12):2037–41.
  • Bae S, Durand F. Defocus magnification. Comput Graph Forum. 2007; 26(3):571–9.
  • Bahrami K, Kot AC, Fan J. A novel approach for partial blur detection and segmentation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Multimedia Expo (ICME); 2013 Jul. p. 1–6.
  • Bardsley J, Jefferies S, Nagy J, Plemmons R. A computational method for the restoration of images with an unknown, spatially-varying blur. Opt Exp. 2006; 14(5):1767–82.
  • Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR); 2005 Jun; 2:60–5.
  • Burton GJ, Moorhead IR. Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. Appl Opt. 1987; 26(1):157–70.
  • Chakrabarti A, Zickler T, Freeman WT. Analyzing spatiallyvarying blur. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR); 2010 Jun. p. 2512–9.
  • Cho TS. Motion blur removal from photographs. [Ph.D. dissertation].Cambridge, MA, USA: Dept Elect Eng Comput Sci, Massachusetts Inst Technol; 2010.
  • Jiao L, Liu F, Yu H. CRIM-FCHO: SAR image twostage segmentation with multifeature ensemble. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2016 Apr; 54(4):2400–23.
  • Yan R, Shao L. Blind image blur estimation via deep learning.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2016 Apr; 25(4):1910–21.
  • Bahrami K, Kot AC. A fast approach for no-reference image sharpness assessment based on maximum local variation..IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 2014 Jun; 21(6):751–5.
  • Kakar P, Sudha N, Ser W. Exposing digital image forgeries by detecting discrepancies in motion blur. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. 2011 Jun; 13(3):443–52.
  • Bahrami K, Kot AC. Efficient image sharpness assessment based on content aware total variation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. 2016 Aug; 18(8):1568–78.
  • Zoran D, Weiss Y. From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration. Proc IEEE Int Conf Computer Vision; Barcelona, Spain. 2011.
  • Tao D, Li X, Lu W, Gao X. Reduced-reference IQA in contourlet domain. IEEE Trans on Syst Man Cybern. 2009;39(6):1623–7.
  • Johnson M, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries through chromatic aberration. Proc 8th Workshop Multimedia and Security; 2006. p. 48–55.
  • Tang H, Joshi N, Kapoor A. Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality. Proc CVPR; 2011. p. 305–12.
  • Shaked D, Tastl I. Sharpness measure: Towards automatic image enhancement. Proc ICIP; 2005. p. 937–40.
  • Yu H, Zhang XR, Wang S, Hou B. Context-based hierarchical unequal merging for SAR image segmentation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2013 Feb; 51(2):995–1009.
  • Fjortoft R, Lopes A, Marthon P, Cubero-Castan E. An optimum multiedge detector for SAR image segmentation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1998 May; 36(3):793–802.
  • Oliver CJ, Blacknell D, White RG. Optimum edge detection in SAR. Proc Inst Elect Eng - Radar Sonar Navig. 1996 Feb; 143(1):31–40.
  • Tupin F, Maitre H, Mangin JF, Nicolas JM, Pechersky E.Detection of linear features in SAR images: Application to road network extraction. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett.1998 Mar; 36(2):434–53.
  • Gu K, Zhai G, Yang X, Zhang W. Using free energy principle for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Trans on Multimedia. 2015 Jan; 17(1):50–63.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.