Total views : 182

Examining the Effects of E-vendor’s Characteristics on Consumer’s Purchase Intention: WeChat Case

Affiliations

  • Graduate School of Dongguk University, 38066, Korea, Republic of
  • Department of Business Administration, Dongguk University, 38066, Korea, Republic of

Abstract


Objectives: This study examines the formation of a consumer’s purchase intention towards e-vendors on WeChat, identifies the key indicators of perceived value and perceived trust, and their links with e-vendors’ characteristics. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The authors verify the research model with users from those who had experienceusing WeChat in China. The selection procedure was random. We employed Amos 18.0 and Partial Least Squares (PLS) using Smart PLS for analyzing 180 valid data in total. The demographic statistics of the sample and analysis result of the measurement models are discussed. Findings: The analysis result shows that the consumer has perceived value is the main basis for consumer’s purchase intention. The paper is different from previous studies because this paper verifies the importance of e-vendor’s characteristics (information quality, word-of-mouth referrals, and order fulfillment) on WeChat. The results have somewhat common discoveries with the findings of previous studies that characteristics of e-vendors have significant effect on customer’s perceived trust, whereas do not have significant influence on consumer’s perceived value. Improvements/Applications: This study provided a better understanding to gain consumer’s trust. E-vendors should provide sufficient, accurate, reliable product information and pay special attention on product’s order delivery relating to customer’s enjoyment.

Keywords

Information Quality, Perceived Trust, Perceived Value, Purchase Intention, Word-Of-Mouth (WOM).

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 196)

References


  • Andalib A, Beni MN. The Effect of Three-Dimensional Advertising Technology on Internet Shopping Trust and Intention, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Oct; 8(27):2−11.
  • Chang TZ, Wildt AR. Price, Product Information and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.1994 Dec; 22(1):6−27.
  • Chiu CM, Huang HY, Hui YC. Antecedents of Trust in Online Auctions, Electronic Commerce Research and Application. 2010 Apr; 9(2):148−50.
  • Delone WH, McLean ER. The Delone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems. 2003 Apr; 19(4):9−30.
  • Derbaix C, Vanhamme J. Inducing Word-Of-Mouth by Eliciting Surprise-A Pilot Investigation, Journal of Economic Psychology. 2003 Feb; 24:99−116.
  • Doney PM. Cannon, JP. An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships, Journal of Marketing.1997Apr; 61(2):35−51.
  • Grabner-Kraeuter S. The Role of Consumers’ Trust in Online-Shopping, Journal of Business Ethics. 2002 Aug; 39:43−50.
  • iao C, Palvia P, Lin HN. The Roles of Habit and Web Site Quality in E-Commerce, International Journal of Information Management. 2006 Dec; 26(6):469−83.
  • Linda SL. Social Commerce---E-Commerce in Social Media Context, World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology. 2010; 72:39−44.
  • Singh J, Sirdeshmukh D. Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments, Journal of the Academy of marketing Science. 2000 Jan; 28(1):150−67.
  • Kim SD, Kim IG. The Affect of Select Properties of Camping Site on Customers’ Satisfaction, Loyalty and Community Attachment, Indian Journal of Science and Technology.2015 Oct; 8(25):2−7.
  • Wolfinbarger M, Gilly MC. Shopping Online for Freedom, Control, and Fun, California Management Review. 2001 Jan; 43(2):34−55.
  • Zeithaml VA. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence, The Journal of Marketing. 1988 Jul; 52(3):2−22.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.