Total views : 127
Michael, Torn between Love and Power: A Storytelling Architecture in the Godfather
Objectives: This paper has the aim to track down the viewers’ cognitive emotion of how they are interacting with the story. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Human minds have cognitive and emotional flows while plots, characters, and action-ideas are intertwined in the story of the film. This paper especially focused on the analysis of characters’ networks with statistical data figures in order to schematize the storytelling architecture. Findings: This paper explores how and why Michael has strongly motivated to constitutionalize a great legitimized cooperative business organization, after he involved in his family mafia organization. This paper examines several figure data to know that Michael’s desire for power is torn between two lovers: his father Vito Corleone and his wife Kay. Storytelling architecture with figure and graph analysis will prove that Michael seeks a true power in the social hierarchs of the USA to protect his family with love. Improvements/ Applications: In the film of The Godfather, Michael has been in a power achieving process and has produced a Legitimized Mafia Organization under the sacrifice of love with Vito and Kay.
Cognitive Emotion, Character’s Network, Desire for Power, Mafia Family, Storytelling Architecture, The Godfather.
- The Godfather Film Script. http://www.thegodfathertrilogy.com/gf1/transcript/gf1transcript.html.Date Accessed: 2009.
- Michael T. Aristotle’s Poetics for Screenwriters: Storytelling Secrets from the Greatest Mind in Western Civilization, 1st (edn.), Hyperion: New York. 2002. p. 192.
- Andrew H, McDougal S Y. Play it again, Sam: retakes on remakes, Berkeley: University of California Press. 1998. p. 358.
- Richard O. Crime and the media: from media studies to post-modernism, Crime and the Media, London: Pluto. 1996. p. 256.
- Balaji D, Londhe B R, Shukla R P. Successful Emotional Branding Campaigns on Television in India: An Exploration. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2016 Apr; 9 (15):1–6.
- Talmy, L. Fictive motion in language and conception. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A. (Eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford Press. 1996. p. 211–76.
- Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1980. p. 242.
- Kovecses Z. Metaphor and Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.2000.
- Frank B. Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention, Applied Linguistics. 2000; 21:553–71.10. Poetics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetics_(Aristotle). Date Accessed:05/10/2016.
- Richards I R. The Philosophy of Rhetoric, New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1936.
- Max B. Models and Metaphors, Cambridge University Press, 1964; 39(150):349–56.
- Lakoff G, Turner M. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1989. p. 103–104.
- Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor, Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1993. p. 202–51.
- Polkinghorne D. Narrative knowing and the human sciences, Albany: State University of New York Press. 1988. p.246.
- Hayden W. Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth‐century Europe, The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, 1973.
- Chase S E. Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (edn), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd (edn.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2005. p. 651–79.
- Abrams M H. A glossary of literary terms, 7th (edn.), Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1999, pp.1-386.
- Riessman C K. Analysis of personal narratives, In J.F. Gubrium and J.A. Holstein, (eds.) Handbook of interview research, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications. 2002. p. 695–710.
- Evelien O, Rousseau R. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 28, 2002. p. 441–53.
- Barthelemy M. Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 2004. p. 163–8.
- Freeman, Linton. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 1977; 40: 35–41,
- Newman, Mark E. J. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social networks, 2005; 27(1): 39-54.
- Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems. 2006.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.