Total views : 161

A Uniform Policy Tool, but with Varied Implementations: Explaining Variations of Incentive Policies for New/Renewable Energy in a Korean Case

Affiliations

  • Department of Public Administration and Policy, Kookmin University, 02707, South Korea
  • Department of Public Administration, Chonbuk National University, 54896, South Korea;

Abstract


Background/Objectives: Korea has uniform incentive policies to promote renewable energy development, but these are applied by each local government in different ways. This study addresses which factors make the difference of implementation strength of the incentive policies to promote new/renewable energy development and use. Methods/Statistical Analysis: A survey was conducted with the directors of the new/renewable energy departments of all 227 local governments in Korea. The response rate was 72.7 %, and 92 local governments were employed for the analysis due to missing results. Statistical analysis was executed by the Ordered Logit Model. We diagnosed parallel regression assumptions and cut-off points, and the results showed validity of this method (financial incentives: chi2(32)=37.84 (prob>chi2=0.2199); nonfinancial incentives: chi2(32)=43.31 (prob>chi2=0.0876); cut-off points (prob>chi2=0.000)). Findings: This study shows that interest groups’ influence and new/renewable energy department level of local governments substantially promote both financial and non-financial incentive offer for new/renewable energy. In addition, whereas assemblies’ influence is likely to reduce financial incentive offer, local governments with policies to reduce environmental pollution tend to increase the financial incentive offer. Local governments implementing environmental regulations more stringently and requiring stronger administrative manpower are likely to reduce non-financial incentive offer for new/renewable energy. These finding shows that local governments applying centralized incentive policies are substantially influenced by several critical factors, such as interest groups’ influence and the new/renewable energy department level of local governments, and these factors cause variations in implementing the incentive policies of local governments. Improvements/Applications: These findings can provide significant information and rationale to enhance the effectiveness of new/renewable energy policies,to manage them, and indeed to promote new/renewable energy development and use.

Keywords

Interest Groups’ Influence, New/Renewable Energy, Renewable Energy Department Level, Uniform Incentive Policies, Varied Incentive Offer

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 136)

References


  • Ha H. The political economy of energy based green economic development: Policy tools and their use for energy based green economic development. Dissertation. Florida State University; 2011.
  • Zhong Z, Cai WG, Wu Y, Ren H. Incentive mechanism design for the residential building energy efficiency improvement of heating zones in North China. Energy Policy. 2009; 37(6):2119-23.
  • Blumstein C. Program evaluation and incentives for administrators of energy-efficiency programs: Can evaluation solve the principal/agent problem? Energy Policy.2010; 38(10):6232-39.
  • Azuela GE, Barroso LA. Design and performance of policy instruments to promote the development of renewable energy: Emerging experience in selected developing countries.Energy and Mining Sector Board Discussion Paper.2011; 22:1-45.
  • Garcia A, Alzate JM, Barrera J. Regulatory design and incentives for renewable energy. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 2012; 41(3):315-36.
  • Fowler L, Breen J. political influences and financial incentives for renewable energy. The Electricity Journal. 2014; 27(1):74-84.
  • Ha H. The influence of political factors on sustainable energy development incentive offer. Korean Public Administration Review. 2012; 46(3):1-32.
  • Faundez P. Renewable energy in a market-based economy: How to estimate its potential and choose the right incentives.Renewable Energy. 2008; 33(8):1768-74.
  • Chandrasekar B, Kandpal TC, A preliminary evaluation of financial incentives for renewable energy technologies in India. International Journal of Energy Research. 2004; 28(10):931-39.
  • Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Oikonomou V. Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency: Exploring the concept of a feed-in tariff for energy savings. Energy Policy.2013; 56:526-35.
  • Pandey K, Banerjee P, Mathur D. Study and modelling of green energy based micro-grid for rural area. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 9(21):1-6.
  • Marata G, Ferrer OS, Dorrill JW, Watkins EL. Renewable energy incentives in the United Sates and Spain: Different Paths-Same Destination? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. 2010; 28(4):481-502.
  • El-Karmi FZ, Abu-Shikhah NM. The role of financial incentives in promoting renewable energy in Jordan. Renewable Energy. 2013; 57:620-25.
  • Simsek HA, Simsek N. Recent incentives for renewable energy in Turkey. Energy Policy. 2013; 63:521-30.
  • Herrick J A. Federal project financing incentives for green industries: Renewable energy and beyond. Natural Resource Journal. 2003; 43(1):77-109.
  • Tang A, Chiara N, Taylor JE. Financing renewable energy infrastructure: Formulation, pricing and impact of a carbon revenue bond. Energy Policy. 2012; 45:691-703.
  • Zhou Y, Wang L, McCalley JD. Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generating expansion planning. Applied Energy. 2011; 88(6):2201-09.
  • Hoicka CE, Parker P, Andrey J. Residential energy efficiency retrofits: How program design affects participation and outcomes. Energy Policy. 2014; 65:594-607.
  • Dhanda U, Gupta S. Exploring the go green mantra in india. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(4):247258.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.