Total views : 301

Quality Assurance as Internal Mechanism of Increasing the Competitiveness of the Higher Education Institution in the Context of International Integration

Affiliations

  • Transbaikal State University, Russia
  • Buryat State University, Russia

Abstract


Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to demonstrate that international independent assessment of education quality supports the internal mechanism of improving the competitiveness of educational institutions in the Baikal Region. Methods: Theoretical and methodological basis of research is represented by methods of independent expert assessment of education quality (certification, auditing, accreditation, ranking); identifying strategic perspective directions and technologies based on the Foresight methodology (scenario approach, expert panels, technological road mapping of the transition from the current state to the stages of development, bibliometric analysis of the database on the quality of education). Findings: The process of consistent regulation and standardization of higher education in Russia is an important component of international harmonization of educational systems. Ensuring higher education specialist training at the level appropriate for future needs of domestic and international labor market predetermines the ever-increasing interest in the educational process quality not only on the part of the state but also on the part of society as a whole. The development of competition in the education market and increased requirements to the quality of education in the labor market place new demands on educational organization management and determine the need for independent evaluation. The basic approaches to an independent evaluation of the quality of educational programs, which give proof of the graduates’ readiness for independent activity in the professional field, are: assessment of higher educational establishment quality of conformity with international management standards through external audit carried out by independent experts; professional public accreditation of educational programs; expert scenario planning of strategic directions to improve the quality of education at the university. Applications/Improvements: The study will help organize, assess and improve educational processes to meet the new requirements set by competition in the modern labor market.

Keywords

External Audit, Independent Assessment of Education Quality, Information Support, Public-professional Accreditation, Strategic Scenario Planning, Transboundary Institutional Mobility.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 196)

References


  • Hernon P, Dugan RE, Schwartz C. Higher education outcomes assessment for the twenty-first century. Libraries Unlimited (an Imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC); 2013.
  • Brusoni M, Damian R, Griffol S, Jackson S, Komurcugil S, Malmedy M, Matveeva O, Motova G, Pisarz S, Pol P,Rostlund A, Soboleva E, Tavares O, Zobel L. The concept of excellence in higher education. ENQA occasional paper. Brussels, Belgium; 2014.
  • Higher education policy. An international comparative perspective. Edited by Goedegebuure L, Kaiser F, Maassen P, Meek L, van Vught F, de Weert E; Pergamon Press; 2013.
  • Motova G, Pykko R. Russian higher education and european standards of quality assurance. Journal of Education. 2012; 47:25–36.
  • Dugarova DTs, Starostina SE. Managerial solutions to improve the quality of educational programs in higher education institutions under the conditions of combined education and labor. Proceedings of Transbaikal State University. Series “Professional education”. 2015; 6(65).
  • Pokholkov YuP, Pushnykh VA, Gerasimov SI, et al. Accreditation of educational programs as the foundation for high-quality engineering education. Education Quality. 2011 Jul-Aug; 7–8:60–3.
  • Association of Russian Lawyers [Internet]. [cited 2016 Feb 15]. Available from: http://alrf.ru/blog/html5-blank/blazheev-viktor-vladimirovich/.
  • National Center of professional and social accreditation [Internet]. [cited 2015 Oct 25]. Available from: http://www.ncpa.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id =412&lang=ru.
  • Trends shaping education. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation [Internet]. 2016 Jan 18 [cited 2016 Feb 09]. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/trends-shaping-education-2016_trends_edu-2016-en.
  • Zou Y. Quality of higher education: organizational and educational perspectives. A study in the Chinese context. River Publishers; 2013.
  • Rostan М, Vaira M. Questioning excellence in higher education: Policies, experiences and challenges in national and comparative perspective. Sense Publishers; 2011.
  • Method for the improvement of the quality of higher education in accordance with the EFQM model [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.enqa.eu.
  • The role of the European Association for quality assurance in higher education ENQA latest developments - PowerPoint PPT [Internet]. [cited 2015 Oct 25]. Available from:https://translate.yandex.ru/?text=The%20role%20of%20the%20European%20Association%20for%20Quality%20Assurance%20in%20Higher%20Education%20ENQA%20latest%20developme%20-%20PowerPoint%20PPT&lang=en-ru.
  • European higher education at the crossroads. Between the Bologna process and national reforms. Edited by Curaj A, Scott P, Vlasceano L, Wilson L. Springer; 2012.
  • EHEA Ministerial Conference and Fourth Bologna Policy Forum. 2015 May 14–15. Yerevan, Republic of Armenia [Internet]. [cited 2016 Feb 22]. Available from: http://bologna-yerevan2015.ehea.info/.
  • Federal Law On Education in the Russian Federation: revised and supplemented text as of 2014. Moscow: Eskimo; 2014.
  • Miles I. Methods in technology foresight, UNIDO regional initiative on technology foresight, Gebze, Turkey; 2007 Nov.
  • Saritas O. Systemic foresight methodology. Fourth International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA). FTA and Grand Societal Challenges – Shaping and Driving Structural and Systemic Transformations, Seville, 2011 May 12–13; 2011.
  • Salmi J. The challenges of establishing world-class universities. Washington DC: World Bank; 2009.
  • Marginson S, van der Wende M. The new global landscape of nations and institutions, higher education to 2030. 2, Globalization. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2009.
  • Altbach P, Resiberg L, Rumbley L. Trends in global higher education. Boston: Tracking an Academic Revolution, CIHE; 2009.
  • Vincent-Lancrin S. Transboundary higher education: trends and prospects of development. Bulletin of International Organizations. 2010; 3(29):86–109.
  • Guidelines on applying ISO 9001:2000 in services. Translated from English Raskin AL. Moscow, RIA Standards and quality; 2002.
  • Quality management system. Guidelines on applying ISO 9001:2001 in education. Moscow: Standartinform; 2007.
  • ISO. 9001:2008 Quality management systems. Requirements [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 02]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/ru/catalogue_detail?csnumber=62085/.
  • Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jul 23]. Available from: http://www.enqa.eu/files/ESG_3edition%20(2).pdf.
  • Avdeev PB, Dugarova DC, Starostina SE. Improving the quality of professional educational programs of college education against modern social and labor relations. Indian Journal of Sciens and Technology. 2015 Dec; 8(10).
  • Handbook of research on transnational higher education. Edited by Mukerji S, Purnendu T; IGI Global; 2013.
  • Van Chanchun. Conditions and prospects of professional education in China. Professional Education. 2007; 8:21–3.
  • Guantun C. Assessment of education quality in higher education institutions in China. Zinan: Shanton University; 2005.
  • Tsonway C, Tsanyuy S, Zhen B. Expansion model. Authenticity and effects of education assessment and meta-assessment: Chzhogo Gaode Tszyaoyuy Behguy; 2004.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.