Total views : 183

Influence of Aeration on Vermicomposting of Pre-Processed Vegetable Waste

Affiliations

  • Department of Civil Engineering, FEAT, Annamalai University, Chidambaram - 608002, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Objectives: Conventional vermicomposting process encroaches larger land area and time in the process. Keeping this as a core problem, an attempt was made to accelerate and digest the high volume of waste by modifying the conventional vermicomposting to engineered vermicomposting. Methods/Statistical Analysis: In the engineered process, the substrate depth was raised to a maximum of 30 cm with artificial aeration and elimination of pre-composting by pre-processing (chopping, pulverizing and stocking) the waste. The study also aimed at optimising the period of aeration in the system by experimenting with five different airflow periods (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours) at a constant flow rate of 0.62 L/min. Findings: The outcome of this bench scale experimental study reveals that augmenting air will influence the waste digestion rate in vermicomposting. In addition, pre-processing the waste will eliminate the pre-composting process in vermicomposting and save considerable time. As per the χ2 statistics, the power equation fitted for cumulative substrate depth reduction (dcr) performsa good for all the aerated bins. The results revealed that 2 hours aeration was insufficient, while 6 -10 hours of aeration leads to quick reduction of moisture content in the substrate mass. Hence, four to six hours of aeration at a flow rate of 0.62 L/min per kg of pre-processed vegetable waste was found to be ideal. Application/Improvements: It was concluded from the experimental study, the vegetable waste volume could be considerably reduced (50% to 60%) by preprocessing it. Further the worm's digestion activity can be accelerated and engineered vermicomposting reduce both time and land requirement in the vermicomposting process.

Keywords

Aeration, E. fetida, Engineered Vermicomposting, Vermicomposting, Waste Pre-Processing.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 161)

References


  • Senthilkumar PL, Kavimani T. Investigation on application of synthetic nutrients for augmenting worm growth rate in vermicomposting. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering. 2012 Jul; 6(1):30–5.
  • Cristina L, Maria GB, Jorge D. Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere. 2008 Jul; 72(7):1013–9. PMid: 18511100. Available from: Crossref
  • Foo EL. An integrated bio-system for a feedlot-AbattoirMeat procession and Research complex in Bali. A feasibility study. 1999.
  • Neuhauser EF, Loehr LC, Malecki MR. The potential of earthworms for managing sewage sludge. Earthworms in Waste and Environment Management. C A Edwards, E F Neuhauser, editors. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing; 1988. p. 9–20.
  • Bansal S, Kapoor KK. Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia fetida.bioresource technology. 2000 Jun; 73(2):95–8. Available from: Crossref
  • Senthilkumar PL, Murugappan A. An experimental study on accelerating the vermicomposting process by stocking vegetable market waste. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology. 2016 Apr; 3(10):55–60.
  • Sing NB, Khare AK, Bhargava DS, Bhattacharya S. Effect of substrate depth on vermicomposting. Institutions of Engineers IE(I) Journal-EN. 2004 May; 85(2):16–21.
  • Senthilkumar PL, Murugappan A, Balaji K, Kavimani T. An experimental study to assess the effect of aeration in substrate depth of process. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2016 Feb; 11(3):124–37.
  • Barrington S, Choiniere D, Trigui M. Compost convective airflow under passive aeration. Bioresource Technology. 2003 Jun; 86(3):259–66. Available from: Crossref 10. Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management. 1st ed. Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO); India. 2000 May.
  • Methods Manual of Soil Testing in India. 1st ed. India: Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture; 2011 Jan.
  • Ranganathan LS. Vermibiotechnology from soil health to human health. Agrobios Publication. India. 2006.
  • Ramamoorthy P. Standardization and nutrient analysis of vermicomposting sugarcane wastes, press-mud trash, bagasse by Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) and Eisenia foetida (Savigny) and the effect of vermicompost on soil fertility and crop productivity. [Ph.D. Thesis]. India: Anna University; 2004.
  • Xie D, Wu W, Hao X, Jiang D, Li X, Bai L. Vermicomposting of sludge from animal wastewater treatment plant mixed with cow dung or swine manure using Eisenia fetida. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016 May; 23(8):7767–75. PMid: 26755173. Available from: Crossref
  • Felix GO, Emilio G. Bio bin scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview. Biotechnology Advances. 2009 Jun; 27(2):153–76. PMid: 19041387. Available from: Crossref
  • Isıl AE, Ayhan U, Murat T. Determination of the effect of aeration rate on composting of vegetable–fruit wastes. Clean – Soil, Air, Water. 2011 May; 39(11):1014–21. Available from: Crossref
  • Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD. The influence of earthworm in processed pig manure on the growth and productivity of marigolds. Bio Resource Technology. 2000 Dec; 75(3):175–80. Available from: Crossref
  • Surindra S. Earthworm production in cattle dung vermicomposting system under different stocking density loads. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2012 Mar; 19(3):748–55. PMid: 21927841. Available from: Crossref
  • Surindra S. Nutrient changes and biodynamic of epigeic earthworm Perionyxe xcavatus (Perrier) during recycling of some agriculture wastes. Bioresour Technology. 2007 Jul; 98(8):1608–14. PMid: 16901690. Available from: Crossref
  • Hala C, Harold M. Separating earthworms from organic media using an electric field. Bio systems engineering. 2008 Sep; 100(3):409–21. Available from: Crossref
  • Grant WC. Status in moisture relationship in earthworm. Ecology. 1995 May; 30(3): 400–7.
  • Edwards C, Bohlem PJ. Biology and ecology of earthworms. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall Publication; 1996.
  • Surindra S. Potential of domestic biogas digester slurry in vermi technology. Bioresource Technology. 2010 May; 101(14):5419–25. PMid: 20189381. Available from: Crossref
  • Ganesh PS, Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi, SA.Vermicomposting of the leaf litter of acacia (Acacia auriculi formis): Possible roles of reactor geometry, polyphenols and lignin. Bioresource Technology. 2009 Jun; 100(5):1819–27. PMid: 19026533. Available from: Crossref
  • Kale RD. Earthworm cinderella of organic farming. Bangalore, India: Prism Book Pvt. Ltd; 1998.
  • Loren N, Janet HT. The Worm Book. Ten-speed press. Canada, 1998. PMCid: PMC106153
  • Elvira CL, Sampedro E, Benitez, Nogales R. Vermicomposting of sledges from paper mill and dairy industries with Eisenia andrei: A pilot-scale study. Bioresource Technology. 1998 Aug; 63(3):205–11. Available from: Crossref
  • Crawford JH. Composting of agriculture waste. Cheremisinoff P.N, Onellette, R.P. Applications and Research. Technomic Publishing company; 1985.
  • Hartenstein R, Hartenstein F. Physico–chemical changes affected in activated sludge by the earthworm (Eisenia foetida). Journal of Environmental Quality. 1981 Sep; 10(3):377–81. Available from: Crossref

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.