Total views : 3538

Software Defined Networking: Research Issues, Challenges and Opportunities

Affiliations

  • Department of Computer Engineering, College of Computer & Information, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia
  • Department of Information Technology, College of Computer & Information Sciences, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia

Abstract


Objectives: This paper focuses on challenges, opportunities and research issues of software defined networking (SDN), as well as how to select the best possible SDN controller, which in result will help to reduce the complexity of a network, price of implementation and maintenance of the network in any big organization. Methods/Statistical Analysis: In order to meet the objective, the review of literature has been carried out in the following contexts; Software defined networking, SDN protocol (Open Flow) and SDN research challenges. Software defined networking is one of the most discussed topic these days. This technology is being considered one of the favorable technologies for isolation of control plane and data plane and logical placement of centralized control from SDN controller. This research focuses on major issues, challenges and current requirements of network implemented in any big organization where traditional network is being implemented. Findings: To solve the issues of multiple located branch networks, cost, technical resources at each location, expertise, separate control plane for configurations, decentralized visibility of network devices, separate VLANs for each branch, complex traffic engineering, limited physical access of branches w.r.t working hours, bandwidth bottleneck at each branch, we surveyed literatures and web resources for the existing SDN controllers like NOX, POX, Ryu, Floodlight, and Open Daylight etc. All these controllers are based on Open Flow protocol. The primary concern is that a conventional system develops gradually, it has a generally abnormal state of operational expenditure and moderately static in nature. SDN holds the guarantee of overcoming those confinements. Major issues which are being faced are increasing requirements from user side, bandwidth availability, hardware (switches requirement at every place), technical resources are required at remote site for configurations, scalability issues, cost, high level processing power at each device, traffic engineering, resiliency against failures, decentralized visibility of hardware devices etc. SDN will helps to improve centralized visibility as all the underlying open flow switches are connected to controller, all switches can be configured from SDN controller without accessing individual switches. Research papers referred in this paper provide a bird eye view of what may cause hurdles further in development and technology integration of technology. Application/Improvements: This research will help how to select the best possible SDN controller which in result will help scalability, less hardware and software requirements, less technical resources requirements, centralized visibility, hassle free traffic engineering and high availability of network.

Keywords

AHP, MCDM, Openflow, SDN, SDN Controller

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 1148)

References


  • Feamster N. The Road to SDN An intellectual history of programmable networks. Publisher ACM. 2013; 11(12):1–21.
  • What is SDN. Available from: www.sdxcentral.com/sdn/ definitions/what-the-definition-of-software-defined-networkingsdn. Date accessed: 01/01/2017.
  • Patouni E, Merentitis A, Panagiotopoulos P, Glentis A. Network Virtualization Trends: Virtually Anything Is Possible by Connecting the Unconnected. IEEE SDN for Future Networks and Services; 2013. p. 1–7.
  • Traditional Vs Software Defined Networking. Available from: www.ipknowledge.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ SDN.pdf. Date accessed: 04/01/2017.
  • Traditional Network Infrastructure Model and Problems Associated with it. Available from: http://www.
  • pluribusnetworks.com/traditional-network-infrastructuremodeland-problems-associated-with-it. Date accessed: 12/12/2016.
  • Astuto ABB. Nunes, Mendonca M, Nguyen XN, Obraczka K, Turletti T. A Survey of Software-Defined Networking Past Present and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2014; 16(3):1617– 34. Crossref
  • Kaur S, Singh J, Ghumman NS. Network Programmability using POX Controller. Proceedings of International Conference on Communication Computing & Systems (ICCCS). 2014; 1:134–8. PMid:25143894 PMCid:PMC4137641
  • Floodlight. Available from: http://www.projectfloodlight. org/floodlight/. Date accessed: 20/12/2016.
  • Lithium. Available from: https://www.opendaylight.org/ lithium. Date accessed: 25/12/2016.
  • Erickson D. The Beacon OpenFlow controller. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking (HotSDN’13). Publisher ACM; 2013. p. 13–8. Crossref
  • Gude N, Koponen T, Pettit J, Pfaff B, Casado M, McKeown N, Shenker S. NOX Towards an operating system for networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 2008; 38(3):105–10. Crossref
  • Voellmy A, Hudak PN. Functional reactive programming of OpenFlow networks. Proceedings of workshop on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages; 2011. p. 235–49. Crossref
  • Jarraya Y, Madi T, Debbabi M. A Survey and a Layered Taxonomy of Software-Defined Networking. Published in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2014; 16(4):1955–80. Crossref
  • Wang R, Butnariu D, Rexford J. Open Flow-based server load balancing. Proceedings of workshop on Hot-ICE-11 USA; 2011. p. 12.
  • Sherwood R, Gibb G, Yap KK, Appenzeller G, Casado M, McKeown N, Parulkar G. Can the production network be the testbed. Proceeding of 9th USENIX conference on Operating systems design and implementation. Vancouver Canada Publisher ACM; 2010. p. 365–78.
  • Heller B, Seetharaman S, Mahadevan P, Yiakoumis Y, Sharma P, Banerjee S, McKeown N. ElasticTree Saving energy in data center networks. Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation San Jose; 2010. p. 17–21.
  • Nayak A, Reimers A, Feamster N, Clark R. Resonance. Dynamic access control in enterprise networks. Proceedings of Workshop on Research on Enterprise Networking Barcelona Spain (WREN’09) Publisher ACM; 2009. p. 11–8.
  • Erickson D. A demonstration of virtual machine mobility in an Open Flow network. ACM SIGCOMM’08 ACM 9781-60558-175-0/08/08. Publisher ACM; 2008. p. 1.
  • Caraguay ALV, Lopez LIB, Villalba LJG. Evolution and Challenges of Software Defined Networking. IEEE Communications Magazine; 2013. p. 1–7.
  • Mysore RN, Pamboris A, Farrington N, Huang N, Miri P, Radhakrishnan S, Vahda A. Portland a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 2009; 39(4):39–50.
  • Floodlightdocumentation. Available from: http://www. projectfloodlight.org/documentation/ Date accessed: 15/12/2016.
  • Heller B, Sherwood R, McKeown N. The controller placement problem, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Hot Topics in Software-Defined Networks (HotSDN’12) Helsinki Finland Publisher ACM; 2012. p. 7–12. Crossref, Crossref
  • Hunag Y, MinChi C, YaoTing T, YuChieh C, YanRen C. A Novel Design for Future on-Demand Service and Security. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT); 2010. p. 385–8.
  • Porras, Shin P, Yegneswaran S, Fong V, Tyson M, Gu M, A Security Enforcement Kernel for OpenFlow Networks. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks (HotSDN); Helsinki Finland; 2012. p. 121–6.
  • Implementation and Performance Analysis of Firewall on Open vSwitch. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/9bb1/4f91b269e72a98d9063d22da2092dc5f552d.pdf Date accessed: 11/11/2016.
  • Casado M, Koponen T, Shenker S, Tootoonchian A. Fabric A retrospective on evolving SDN. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks (HotSDN); Helsinki; 2012. p. 1–5. Crossref PMCid:PMC3389431
  • Lara A, Kolasani A, Ramamurthy B. Network Innovation using OpenFlow A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2014; 16(1):493–512. Crossref
  • Open Flow Switch Specification. Open Networking Foundation ONF. p. 106 Available from: https://wand.net.nz/~brad/papers/openflow-spec-v1.5.0.pdf. 19/12/2014.
  • Shin MK, Nam KH, Kim HJ. Software-Defined Network (SDN) A Reference Architecture and Open APIs in ICT Convergence. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on ICT Convergence (ICTC); Jeju Island; 2012. p. 360–1.
  • Kim H, Feamster N. Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2013; 51(2):114–9. Crossref
  • Rothenberg EC, Nascimento RM, Salvador MR, Corrêa NAC, Lucena CS, Raszuk R. Revisiting routing control platforms with the eyes and muscles of software-defined networking. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks (HotSDN); 2012. p.13–7. Crossref PMid:28083220 PMCid:PMC4945262
  • Bakshi K. Considerations for Software Defined Networking (SDN) Approaches and use cases. Proceedings of the mIEEE Aerospace Conference Big Sky MT; 2013. p. 1–9. Crossref
  • Xia W, Wen Y, Foh CH, Niyato D, Xie H. A Survey on Software-Defined Networking. IEEE communication surveys and tutorials. 2015; 17(1):27–51.
  • Xie H, Tsou T, Lopez D, Sidi R, Yin H, Aranda PA. Softwaredefined Networking Efforts. IETF Journal Published by the Internet Society in cooperation with the Internet Engineering Task Force; 2012.
  • SDN Series Part Eight Comparison of Open Source SDN Controllers. Available from: https://thenewstack.io/ sdn-series-part-eight-comparison-of-open-source-sdncontrollers. Date accessed: 12/10/2016.
  • The NOX Controller. Available from: https://github.com/ noxrepo/nox.Date accessed: 08/08/2016.
  • Fernandez, Marcial. Evaluating OpenFlow controller paradigms. Proceeding of The 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Information-Centric Networking; 2013. p. 151–7.
  • Tootoonchian A, Gorbunov S, Ganjali Y, Casado M, Sherwood R. On Controller Performance in Softwaredefined networks. Proceeding of the 2nd USENIX conference on Hot Topics in Management of Internet Cloud and Enterprise Network and Services; 2012. p. 10.
  • Khondoker R, Zaalouk, Marx R. Feature-based Comparison and Selection of Software. World Congress on Computer Applications and Information Systems (WCCAIS-2014); 2014. p. 1–7. Crossref
  • Shalimov A, Zuikov D, Zimarina D, Pashkov V, Smeliansky R. Advanced study of SDN/OpenFlow controllers. Proceedings of the 9th central & eastern European software engineering conference in Russia Publisher ACM; 2013.
  • Gandibleux X. Multiple criteria optimization state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
  • Ishizaka A, Labib A. Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice Benefits and limitation. Publisher Springer link. 2009; 22(4):201–20.
  • J David, D Saaty. Use analytic hierarchy process for project selection ASQ Six sigma forum magazine; 2007. p. 1–8.
  • Kotani D, Suzuki K, Shimonishi H. A Design and Implementation of Open Flow Controller handling IP Multicast with Fast Tree Switching. Proceedings of the IEEE/IPSJ International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT) Izmir Turkey; 2012. p. 60–7.
  • Bruno Astuto A. Nunes, Marc Mendonca, Xuan-Nam Nguyen, Katia Obraczka Thierry Turletti. A Survey of Software-Defined Networking Past Present and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2014; 16(3):1617–34. Crossref
  • Mattos MFD, Fernandes NC, Costa TV, Cardoso PL, Campista MEM, Costa MKLH, Duarte OMNI. Open Flow Management Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on the Network of the Future; 2011. p. 52–6.
  • Reitblatt M, Foster N, Rexford J, Schlesinger C, Walker D. Abstractions for Network Update. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications Technologies Architectures and Protocols for Computer Communication Helsinki Finland; 2012. p. 323–34. Crossref
  • Wang R, Butnariu D, Rexford J. Open Flow-Based Server Load Balancing Gone Wild. Proceedings of the USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Management of Internet Cloud and Enterprise Networks and Services; 2011. p. 12.
  • Boucadair M, Jacquenet C. Service Function Chaining Framework &Architecture; 2014.
  • YuHunag C, MinChi T, YaoTing C, YuChieh C, YanRen C. A Novel Design for Future on-Demand Service and Security. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Technology PublisherIEEE; 2010. p. 385–8.
  • Erickson D. The Beacon OpenFlow controller. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking (HotSDN’13) PublisherACM; 2013. p. 13–8. Crossref
  • Yang M, Li Y, Jin D, Zeng L, Wu X, Vasilakos AV. SoftwareDefined and Virtualized Future Mobile and Wireless Networks A Survey. Springer. 2015; 20(1):4–18.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.