Total views : 167

Employees’ Budget Participation and Its Effect on Departmental Performance in Sabah Local Authority

Affiliations

  • Accounting Centre, Faculty of Business, Economics & Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

Abstract


This study observes the effect of Budget Participation (BP) on the Departmental Performance (DP) through Organizational Commitment (OC) in Malaysian local authorities, specifically in Sabah. A questionnaire survey was conducted with responses from fifty-eight (58) budget preparers and budget users. The data was then analysed by using SPSS and tested through mediation analysis, path analysis and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation techniques. The findings reveal that employees’ participation in budgeting setting at Sabah local authorities has a positive relationship with its DP. This positive relationship is even stronger with the mediation effect of OC. Thus, it advocates that BP among employees at Sabah local authorities has strong indirect effect on the DP, through the mediation effect of OC, between BP and DP, in Sabah local authorities.

Keywords

Budget Participation, Departmental Performance, Local Authorities, Organizational Commitment

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 115)

References


  • Kochik S. Budget participation in Malaysian local authorities [PhD theis]. UK, Ashton University of Birmingham; 2011.
  • Brownell P. Participation and budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness. The Accounting Review Journal. 1981 Oct; 56(4):844–60.
  • Greenberg PS, Greenberg RH, Nouri H. A meta-analytic examination of methodological moderators. Accounting, Organisation and Society. 1994; 13:117.
  • Milani K. The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: a field study. The Accounting Review. 1975 Apr; 50(2):274–84.
  • Kenis I. Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on management attitudes and performance. The AccountingReview. 1979 Oct; 54(4):707–21.
  • Stedry AC. Budget control and cost behaviour. Prentice Hall, Homel Hempstead;1960.
  • Bryan JF, Locke EA. Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1967 Jun; 51(3):274–7. Crossref
  • Nouri H, Parker RJ. The relationship between budget participation and job performance: the roles of budget adequacy and organisational commitment. Accounting, Organisational and Soceity. 1998 Jul– Aug; 23(5–6):467–83.Crossref.
  • Noor MID, Othman R. Budgetary participation: how it affects performance and commitment. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest; 2012 Oct.
  • Shields JF. Antecedents of participative budgeting.Accounting Organisations and Society. 1998 Jun; 23(1):49– 76. Crossref.
  • Campbell, Ian J. Budgeting: is it a technical or behavioural process. Management Accounting; 1985. p. 66–70.
  • Abata MA. Participative budgeting and managerial performance in the Nigerian food products sector. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics (GJCRA) An Online International Research Journal. 2014; 1(3):148–67.
  • Chong VK, Chong KM. Budget goal commitment and informational effects of budget participation on performance: a structural equation modeling approach.Behavioral Research in Accounting. 2002 Feb; 14(1):65–86.Crossref.
  • Chong VK, Johnson DM. Testing a model of the antecedents and consequences of budgetary participation on job performance. Accounting and Business Research. 2007; 37(1):3–19. Crossref.
  • Subramaniam N, Mia L. The relation between decentralised structure, budgetary participation and organisational commitment: the moderating role of managers’ value orientation towards innovation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability. 2001; 14(1):12–29. Crossref.
  • Hofstede GH. The game of budget control. Journal of the Operational Research Society, ResearchGate. 1970 Mar; 21(1):135–6.
  • Wentzel K. The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers’ performance in a budget setting. Behaviour Research in Accounting. 2002 Feb; 14(1):247–71. Crossref.
  • Mathieu JE, Hamel D. A case model of the antecedents of organizational commitment among professionals and nonprofessionals.Journal of Vocational Behaviour. 1989 Jun;34(3):299–317. Crossref.
  • Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Gellaty IR. Affective and continuance to the organisation: evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1990 Dec; 75(6):710–20. Crossref.
  • Allen NJ, Meyer JP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1990 Mar; 63(1):1–18. Crossref.
  • Govindrajan V. Impact of participation in the budgetary process on managerial attitudes and performance: universalistic and contingency perspectives. Decisions Sciences.1986 Oct; 17(4):496–516. Crossref.
  • Mia L. Managerial attitude, motivation and the effectiveness of budget participation. Accounting, Organisational and Society. 1988; 13(5):465–75. Crossref.
  • Mia L. The impact of participation in budgeting and job difficulty on managerial performance and work motivation: a research note. Accounting, Organisation and Soceity. 1989; 14(4):347–57. Crossref.24. Welsch GA. Budgeting for management planning and control.The Journal of Accountancy.
  • DeCottis TA, Summers TP. A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organisational commitment.Human relation. 1987; 40(7):445–570. Crossref.
  • Boshof C, Mels G. A casual model to evaluate the relationships among supervision, role stress, organisational commitment and internal service quality. European Journal of Marketing. 1967; 29(2):23–42. Crossref.
  • Yahya MN, Ahmad NNN, Fatima AH. Budgetary participation and performance: some Malaysian evidence.International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2008; 21(6):658–73. Crossref.
  • de Stede WAV. Measuring ‘tight budgetary control’.Management Accounting Research. 2001; 12(1):119–37.Crossref.
  • Williams LJ, Hazer JT. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: a reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods.Journal of Apply Psychology. 1986 May; 71(2):219–31.Crossref.
  • Williams JJ, Macintosh NB, Moore JC. Budget related behaviour in public sector organization: some empirical evidence. Accounting, Organisation and Society. 1990; 15(3):221–46. Crossref.
  • Cooper DR, Schindler PS. Business research methods.10th edition. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York; 2007 Nov 28.
  • Creswell JW. Research design, qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications; 1994 Apr 19. p. 228.
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986 Dec; 51(6):1173– 82. Crossref.
  • Brownell P, McInnes M. Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. The Accounting Review.1986 Oct; 61(4):587–600.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.