Total views : 192

### Using Rasch Analysis to Identify Difficult Course Outcomes in Linear Algebra

#### Affiliations

• SEGi University, Centre of Engineering Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
• Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
• King Abdul Aziz University, Saudi Arabia

#### Abstract

Linear Algebra, the second Engineering Mathematics subject for all the engineering students in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia contains abstract concepts and difficult for students to understand the subject. This study aimed to identify the tough Course Outcome or topics for the Linear Algebra subject. A total of 282 engineering students from electrical, mechanical, chemical and civil engineering participated in the pre-test. The study based on a set of pre-test questions which covers the entire Course Outcomes of Linear Algebra subject. The content of pre-test questions consists of items based on the level of Bloom Taxanomy (knowledge, comprehension, analysis, synthesis and evaluation). Rasch Measurement Model is used to analyze the result. Summary statistics for questions, summary statistics for persons, fit statistics and item dimensionality test are the output achieved from Rasch analysis. Summary statistics for item indicated a good item difficulty of spread. Summary statistics for person indicated a low person reliability value. This means students provided irregular answers for the pre-test questions. Fit statistics identified two questions as misfit. These questions need to be restructured in future. The item dimensionality test indicates the pre-test questions are within the scope of measuring students’ problem-solving ability. Analysis showed that two Course Outcomes identified as the difficult Course Outcomes in Linear Algebra subject. They are the concepts of vector space, diagonalization, quadratic forms and power series. Questions related to comprehension and application level of Bloom Taxanomy are difficult for students to be solved. This study provides an in-sight view of the Linear Algebra subject by under-pinning the difficult area of the subject. Engineering faculty students should be given more emphasize on the difficult Course Outcome of Linear Algebra subjects. Efforts should be taken by educators to illustrate those topics in a much more simple way.

#### Keywords

Course Outcome, Difficult, Engineering Mathematics, Linear Algebra, Rasch Measurement Model.

#### Full Text:

|  (PDF views: 125)

#### References

• Van de Walle JA, Karp KS, Bay–Williams JM. Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2009. PMCid: PMC2606062.
• Cartwrigh R, Weiner K, Streamer-Veneruso S. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook, Montgomery College, Montgomery Country, Maryland; 2009.
• Shahir A, Riza AAOKR, Azami Z, Baba MD, Noorhisham TK, Mardina A, Mazlan MT, Andanastuti M, Che HA. Implementing Continual Review of Programme Educational Objectives and Outcomes for OBE Curriculum Based on Stakeholder’s Input. Proceeding of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology (Edu’08); 2008.
• Rozeha AR, Azami Z, Saifudin M. Application of Rasch Measurement in Evaluation of Learning Outcomes: A Case Study in Electrical Engineering. Regional Conference on Engineering Mathematics, Mechanics, Manufacturing and Architecture (EM3ARC); 2007.
• Kamsuria A, Nazlena MA, Suhaila Z. An Improved Course Assessment for Analyzing Learning Outcomes Performance using Rasch Model, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 18:442−49. Crossref
• Azrilah AA, Azlinah M, Azami Z, Sohaimi Z, Hamzah AG, Mohd SM. Evaluation of Information Professionals Competency Face Validity Test using Rasch Model. 5th WSEAS / IASME International Conference on Engineering Education (EE’08); 2008. p. 22-24.
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Bonds and Fox Steps (customized version of WINSTEPS), Computer Software. 2006.
• Draugalis JT, Jackson TR. Objective Curricular Evaluation: Applying the Rasch Model to a Cumulative Examination, American Journal of Pharmaceutical. 2004; 68(2):1−12.
• Green KE. Survey Development and Validation with the Rasch Model. International Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation and Testing. South Carolina, USA; 2002.
• Bond TG, Fox CM, Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Science. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
• Pomeranz JL, Byers KL, Moorhouse MD, Velozo CA, Spitzngel RJ. Rasch Analysis as a Technique to Examine the Psychometric Properties of a Career Ability Placement Survey Subtest, Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin. 2008; 51(4):251−59. Crossref.

### Refbacks

• There are currently no refbacks.