Total views : 262

Geospatial Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon in the Bhima River Watershed Region of Solapur District, Maharashtra, India


  • Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth Sciences, Solapur University, Solapur – 413255, Maharashtra, India


Objectives: To determine the Soil Organic Carbon Density (SOCD) and to observe distribution of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) in the Bhima River sub-watershed of Solapur. Methods/Analysis: The spatial distribution of Soil Organic Carbon and it density was shown by Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation technique using ArcGIS and the subsequent map generated in the process account for the fertility across the watershed and its longitudinal section. Total 36 sampling points were used for soil sampling and are processed for the output map. The land cover type of barren land and agriculture field were selected for soil sampling. Walkley and Black method was used for analysis of soil organic carbon and organic matter was calculated as a derived parameter. Findings: It is found that average soil bulk density was 1.15 gm cm-3 and the difference in SOCD from the minimum to maximum was 2.85 kg/m2 with average of 1.87 kg/m2. The lower values carbon was at high elevation and higher values were recorded nearer to mouth of river. There seems to be insignificant correlation between bulk density and SOC. Applications/Improvements: The SOC comparison between different land cover, clearly shows that agricultural terrains were richer as compared to barren lands. The outcome of the research could be of importance for the policy makers and management of agriculture, as SOC is the major nutrient in terrestrial ecosystems.


Erosion, GIS, Soil Fertility, Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), Soil Organic Carbon Density (SOCD).

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 117)


  • Périé C, Ouimet R. Organic carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationships in boreal forest soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 2008; 88(3):315–25. Crossref
  • Sreenivas K, Sujatha G, Sudhir K, Kiran D, Fyzee M, Ravisankar T, Dadhwal VK. Spatial Assessment of Soil Organic Carbon Density through Random Forests Based Imputation. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 2014; 42(3):577–87. Crossref
  • Bhunia G, Shit P, Maiti R. Soil organic carbon stock explored by geo-spatial modeling at Sagar Island, India. Spatial Information Research. 2016; 24(5):503–14. Crossref
  • Tang X, Guan D. Organic carbon stocks and erosion in the soils of Guangdong, South China. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2014; 72(7):2597–606. Crossref
  • Calazans SOL, Morais VA, Scolforo JRS, Zinn YL, Mello JM, Mancini LT, Silva CA. Soil organic carbon as a key predictor of N in forest soils of Brazil. Journal of Soils and Sediments; 2016. p. 1–10. Crossref
  • Imamoglu A, Dengiz O. Determination of soil erosion risk using RUSLE model and soil organic carbon loss in Alaca catchment (Central Black Sea region, Turkey). Rendiconti Lincei. 2016; 28(1):11–23. Crossref
  • Solapur Geography and climate. Official website of District Collector Solapur. Date Accessed: 14/03/2017. Available from:
  • Climate Description of Solapur district. Date Accessed: 04/04/2017. Available from: Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf
  • Mandal A. Study of distribution of xylanase producing microbes in soil: A case study in midnapore town, paschim medinipur, West Bengal, India. Asian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Aug; 06(08):1712–8.
  • Ahmad Dar J, Somaiah S. Altitudinal variation of soil organic carbon stocks in temperate forests of Kashmir Himalayas, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2015; 187:11. Crossref PMid:25619695
  • Winowiecki L, Vågen TG, Massawe B, Jelinski N, Lyamchai C, Sayula G, Msoka E. Landscape-scale variability of soil health indicators: Effects of cultivation on soil organic carbon in the Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2015; 105(3):263–74. Crossref
  • Zhou T, Shi P, Luo J, Shao Z. Estimation of soil organic carbon based on remote sensing and process model. Frontiers of Forestry in China. 2008; 3(2):139–47. Crossref
  • Zhang Z, Yu D, Shi X, Wang N, Zhang G. Priority selection rating of sampling density and interpolation method for detecting the spatial variability of soil organic carbon in China. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2014; 73(5):2287– 97. Crossref
  • Yang Y, Chen Y, Li W, Chen Y. Distribution of soil organic carbon under different vegetation zones in the Ili River Valley, Xinjiang. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2010; 20(5):729–40. Crossref
  • Wasige J, Groen T, Rwamukwaya B, Tumwesigye W, Smaling E, Jetten V. Contemporary land use/land cover types determine soil organic carbon stocks in south-west Rwanda. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2014; 100(1):19–33. Crossref
  • Huang S, Pan X, Guo J, Qian C, Zhang W. Differences in soil organic carbon stocks and fraction distributions between rice paddies and upland cropping systems in China. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2013; 14(1):89–98. Crossref
  • Xu G, Lu K, Li Z, Li P, Wang T, Yang Y. Impact of soil and water conservation on soil organic carbon content in a catchment of the middle Han River, China. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2015; 74(8):6503–10. Crossref
  • Ladoni M, Alavipanah S, Bahrami H, Noroozi A. Remote Sensing of Soil Organic Carbon in Semi-Arid Region of Iran. Arid Land Research and Management. 2010; 24(4):271–81. Crossref
  • Curtis R, Post B. Estimating Bulk Density from OrganicMatter Content in Some Vermont Forest Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1963; 28(2):285–6. Crossref


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.