Total views : 348

Computer-Related Health Problems among White- Collar Employees: Communicating a Blueprint

Affiliations

  • Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, Kunnamangalam - 673570, Kerala, India

Abstract


Objective: To analyze the existence of computer-related health problems among white-collar employees; and to suggest a blueprint for prevention. Methods/Statistical Analysis: A study was conducted across segments among white-collar employees from South India with a participant volume of 259. The chi-square test in SPSS version 22 was used for analyzing the results. Findings: The existence of visual problems in the participant set was 65% (168/259), and musculoskeletal problems were conveyed by 67% (173/259) whilst 32% (84/259) experienced stressful signs. The study established that there was a steady upsurge in visual complaints as the total hours working on computers added day by day. Similar link was discovered for musculoskeletal complications. Improvements/Applications: A lot of research on the topic has been done already. The blueprint that should be communicated to the employees to tackle the computer-related health concerns makes it exclusive. The evidence can be used by employers to cultivate a practice and very essentially, will navigate them in building a well-informed workforce. It will also facilitate them modify the workplace to augment employer branding.

Keywords

Action Plan, Health Problems, Standardized Nordic Questionnaire, White-Collar Employees.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 262)

References


  • Jim LL. Computer health hazards: Fact or fiction? Available from: http://members.aol.com/zenion/introduction.html
  • Computing basics, smart computing magazine PC health hazards. 2000; 11(6):61–2.
  • Hearts to heart talk. Computer health hazards. Internet Article; 2003.
  • Are computers a health hazard? Leapfrog News. Available from: http//:www.ribbit.net/computers_health_hazard.html
  • Smith MJ, Cohen BCF, John LWS. An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Human Factors. 1981; 23(4):387–400.
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Potential health hazards of video display terminals. DHHS (NIOSH) publication No. 81-129. Cincinnati: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; 1981.
  • World Health Organization, Provisional statements of WHO working group on occupational health aspects in the use of visual display units. VDT News. 1986; 3(1):13.
  • Horgen AG, Ro O. Work with the visual display unit: Health consequences. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. 2000; 12(1):107–34.
  • Bullock M. Ergonomics in a technological world: Implications for occupational health. 25th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia. Ergonomics Society of Australia; 1989. p. 18.
  • Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L. Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optometry and Vision Science. 1991; 68(11):888–92.
  • Yaginuma Y, Yamada H, Nagai H. Study of the relationship between lacrimation and blink in VDT work. Ergonomics. 1990; 33(6):799–808.
  • Tsubuta K, Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. Letter to the Editor, New England Journal of Medicine. 1993; 328(8):584.
  • Burgess-Limerick R, Chang S, Cook C. The prevalence of neck and upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms in computer mouse users. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2000; 26(3):347–56.
  • Marcus M, Gerr F, Monteilh C, Ortiz D, Gentry E, Cohen S, Edwards A, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D. A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2002; 41(4):236–49.
  • Amell TK, Kumar S. Cumulative trauma disorders and keyboarding work. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2000; 25(1):69–78.
  • Bergqvist U, Wolgast E, Nilsson B, Voss M. Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: Individual, ergonomic, and work organizational factors. Ergonomics. 1995; 38(4):763–76.
  • Wahlstrom J. Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. Occupational Medicine (London). 2005; 55(3):168–76.
  • Sharma AK, Khera S, Khandekar J. Occupational health problems and role of ergonomics in information technology professionals in national capital region. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2006; 9(3):111–4.
  • Bhatt JV. Study of computer stress among computer professionals: Special reference to dry eye. Available from: http://openmed.nic.in/view/year/2006.html 20. Panel on impact of video displays, work and vision. Video Displays, Work and Vision. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1983.
  • Council on scientific affairs. American medical association. Health effects of video display terminals. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987; 257(11):1508–12.
  • Cole BL, Maddocks JD, Sharpe K. Effects of VDUs on the eyes: Report of a 6-year epidemiological study. Optometry and Vision Science. 1996; 73(8):512–28.
  • Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Is computer use a risk factor for myopia? Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1996; 67(9):521–30.
  • Dainoff MJ, Happ A, Crane P. Visual fatigue and occupational stress in VDT operators. Human Factors. 1981; 23(4):421–38.
  • Staff SJ, Thompson CR, Shute SJ. Effects of video display terminals on telephone operators. Human Factors. 1982; 24(6):699–711.
  • Rossignol AM. Video display terminal use and reported health symptoms among Massachusetts clerical workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1987; 29(2):112–8.
  • Collins MJ, Brown B, Bowman KJ, Carkeet A. Symptoms associated with VDT use. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 1990; 73(4):111–8.
  • Sheedy JE. Vision problems at video display terminals: A survey of optometrists. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1992; 63(10):687–92.
  • Salibello C, Nilsen E. Is there a typical VDT patient? A demographic analysis. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1995; 66(8):479–83.
  • Seppala P. Experiences on computerization in different occupational groups. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 1995; 7(4):315–27.
  • Smith MJ, Sainfort PC. A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1989; 4(1):67–79.
  • a. Infotech.com. India. Safe Computing Tips: How to avoid RSI and computer related health hazards. Available from: http://www.India–infotech.com/Articles/safe_computing.html b. Skincare S. Harms of computer to health. How computer use effect health in long run. Available from: http://www. Adeptadvice.com/complete-insight Harm
  • Henning RA, Jacques P, Kissel GV, Sullivan AB, Alteras-Webb SM. Frequent short rest breaks from computer work: Effects on productivity and wellbeing at two field sites. Ergonomics. 1997; 40(1):78–91.
  • Ketola R, Toivonen R, Hakkanen M, Luukkonen R, Takala EP, Juntura EV. Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2002; 28(1):18–24.
  • Ripple PH. Variations of accommodation in vertical directions of gaze. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1952; 35(11):1630–4.
  • Sheedy JE. Vision at computer displays. Walnut Creek, CA: Vision Analysis; 2005.
  • Jonathan. ergonomic and computer injury. Available from: http://www.netsci.org/Science/Special/feature
  • Artist resources. Computer safety, computer hazards and safety. Available from: http://www.artistresources.org/hazards.htm
  • Safe computing tips. Available from: http://www.aarogya.com/Conditions/Computer/tips.asp
  • Caution: Health hazards from computers are real. Filipino Reporter; 2015 May 29-June 4.
  • Action needed to force regular screen breaks. Occupational Health [serial online]. 2014 Aug; 66(8):4. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.