Total views : 358

Optimal Layout for Intermediate Steel Moment Resisting Frames with Special Chevron Braces

Affiliations

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • MSc. Student in Structural Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


Background: Topology and shape of the structures are very important in terms of the building’s weight and cost. Regarding structural performance, dual structural systems, consisting of steel moment resisting frames with chevron braces, have many applications worldwide and especially in Iran. Methods/Statistical analysis: In this paper, construction cost optimization of dual structural systems is investigated for the different number of floors, span lengths, and soil types. In total, 18 building models are examined and estimated for costs, which are defined in accordance to the architectural requirements for parking areas and code regulations for design. Storey heights are assumed to be 3.5 meters for all models and the construction site is in Tehran, Iran with very high earthquake risks. Construction cost is estimated based on the current Iranian price list. Findings: The obtained results are compared to each other, regardless of the land price and then the optimal ratio between the land price and construction costs is calculated for the most favorable model. The findings show that 5-storey structures with shorter span lengths (5.6 meters) are more economical. However, in the case of 10 and 14-storey structural models, 7.5 meters span for parking of three vehicles, is more economical. In the other words, by increasing the height of the building the optimum span length increases. In addition, the type of soil has a remarkable effect in the total structural cost by increasing the height of the structure Application/Improvements: The results of this article are very useful for engineers to decide how to locate columns and frame elements in a specific plan in order to achieve an optimal layout.

Keywords

Chevron Braces, Intermediate Moment Resisting Frames, Optimal Layout, Special Braces, Steel Frames

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 275)

References


  • Sasi S B, Sivanandam N. A Survey on Cryptography using Optimization algorithms in WSNs”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 8(3): 216–21
  • Sanaei E, Babaei M. Topology Optimization of Structures using Cellular Automata with Constant Strain Triangles.International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012;10(3): 179–18
  • Banihashemi MR, Mirzagoltabar AR, Tavakoli HR. The Effects of Yield Mechanism Selection on the Performance based Plastic Design of Steel Moment Frame. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2015, 8(9): 157–70
  • Kaveh A, Farhoodi N. Layout Optimization for X-bracing of Planar Steel Frames Using Ant System. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 2010; 8(3): 256–75
  • Siddiqi ZA, Hameed R, Akmal U. Comparison of Different Bracing Systems for Tall Buildings. Pak. J. Engg. and Appl. Science 2014; 14 (1): 17–26
  • Rahjoo S, Mamagani B. X-Bracing Configuration and Seismic Response. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation. 2014; 8(6): 628–38
  • Jármai K, Farkas J, Kurobane Y. Optimum seismic design of a multi-storey steel frame. Engineering Structures. 2006; 28(7): 1038–48.
  • Babaei M. Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures.American Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015; 3(4): 102–06.
  • Babaei M, Taherkhani S. Optimal topology design of intermediate steel moment resisting frames with reinforced concrete shear walls. Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2015; 10(17): 37909–16
  • Babaei M, Amiri J D. “Determining the Optimal Topology for Intermediate Steel Moment Resisting Frames with Eccentric Braces in a Hybrid System. International Journal of Structural Engineering. 2016; 7(3): 304–13
  • Standard No. 2800. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings Third Revision, Building and Housing Research Center. Tehran. 2005 (In Persian).
  • INBC. Iranian National Building Code, Part 6, Design Loads for Buildings. Ministry of Road, Housing and Urban Development. Tehran. 2013 (In Persian).
  • ICC. International Building Code. International Code Council, First Edition. 2006.
  • AISC. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-05, American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago; 2005.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.