Total views : 281

Aging Mentors in the Changing Organizational Odyssey: An Analysis


  • Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Khadki, Pune - 411020, Maharashtra, India
  • Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad – 201001, Uttar Pradesh, India


Background/Objectives: As a person advances in age his/her thinking also matures and as a result he/she makes a mature mentor. The present piece of empirical research is an endeavor into exploring the older mentors' perception about mentorship. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The sample comprised of 260 managers, in the age range of 30 to 50 years, working in public as well as private sector organizations. 'A Checklist of Mentorship Perceptions' was used with them. The responses for the questionnaire were obtained from managers who were also assigned the role of mentors in the organizational formal mentorship programs. The sampling was convenience based. The data were analyzed with the help of descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations and chi-squares. Findings: The older the mentors become, the greater is found their belief that sharing of success and failure-stories and providing the mentees with the ethical guidelines is essential for successful mentoring to take place. The older mentors perceive personal experience-sharing and counseling important for mentoring. They believe that 'mentee competence' is the issue which is handled by mentors. The perceived frequency of mentorship meetings, is observed to be 'once a month'. They believe that attitude, interpersonal skill and emotional maturity of mentees are the skills to be developed by them. The existing body of mentoring research provides a great deal of knowledge about the importance of mentoring, relevant structural factors surrounding mentoring relationships and characteristics of mentors and protegees (Fagenson, 1992; Ragins and Scandura, 1994; Scandura and Ragins, 1993). It has mostly dealt with the mentees' perspective. There is difference in frequency of interaction, organizational level of mentors and proteges and formality of the relationship (Finkelstein, Allen and Rhoton, 2003) which is studied in detail. The present study focuses on the 'mentor's perspective' and the issue of 'age of mentor' in mentoring relationships. Applications/Improvements: By managing an aging workforce organizations can utilize the vast experience, unfathomed potential and mature decision-making lying untapped with this workforce. This will add a Midas touch to the organization and its business.


Aging Mentors, Aging Workforce, Changing Organizations, Mentoring, Mentorship, Older Mentors.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 240)


  • Ross-Gordon JM, Brooks AK. Diversity in Human Resource Development and continuing professional education: What does it mean for the workforce, clients and professionals? Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2004 Feb; 6(1):69–85.
  • Ragins BR, Scandura TA. The way we were: Gender and the termination of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997 Dec; 82(6):945–53.
  • Allen TD, Russell JE, Maetzke SB. Formal peer mentoring: Factors related to proteges satisfaction and willingness to mentor others. Group and Organization Management. 1997 Dec; 22(4):488–507.
  • Satter AM, Russ DE. Why don’t more senior leaders mentor: And how they are mortgaging their company’s future in the process. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2007 Dec; 16(4):382–90.
  • Ehrich LC, Hansford B, Tennent L. Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2004 Oct; 40(4):518–40.
  • Crosby FJ. The developing literature on developmental relationships. A. J. Murrell, F. J. Crosby, R. J. Ely (Eds). Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999. p. 3–20.
  • Jacobi, M. Focus group research: A tool for the student affairs professional. NASPA Journal. 1991; 28(3):195–201.
  • Hurley D. The mentor mystique. Psychology Today. 1988 May; 22(5):42–4.
  • Collins EGC, Scott P. Everyone who makes it has a mentor. Harvard Business Review. 1978 Jan; 56(4):89–101.
  • Mertz NT. What’s a Mentor, Anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly. 2004 Oct; 40(4):541–60.
  • Levinson DJ, Darrow CN, Klein EB, Levinson MA, McKeen B. Seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf; 1978.
  • Hall DT, Mirvis PH. The new career contract: Developing the whole person at midlife and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1995 Dec; 47(3):269–89.
  • Kram KE. A relational approach to career development. D.
  • T. Hall (Ed). The career is dead - Long live the career. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996. p. 132–57.
  • Kram KE, Hall DT. Mentoring in a context of diversity and turbulence. S. Lobel E. Kossek (Eds). Human Resource Strategies for Managing Diversity. London: Blackwell; 1996. p. 108–36.
  • Mirvis PH, Hall DT. Career development for the older worker. D. T. Hall (Ed). The career is dead - Long live the career. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 1996. p. 278–96.
  • Allen TD, McManus SE, Russell JEA. Newcomer socialization and stress: Formal peer relationships as a source of support. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1999 Jun; 54(3):453–70.
  • Morton A. Mentoring. York: LTSN Generic Centre; 2003 Jul.
  • Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protege: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004 Feb; 89(1):127–36.
  • Noe RA, Greenberger D B. Wang S. Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. G. R. Ferris and J. J. Martocchio (Eds). Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. New York: JAI Press; 2002. p. 129–74.
  • Sosik JJ, Godshalk VM. Leadership styles, mentoring functions received and job-related stress: A conceptual model and preliminary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2000 May; 21(4):365–90.
  • Viator RE. The association of formal and informal public accounting mentoring with role stress and related job outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2001 Jan; 26(1):73–93.
  • Forret M, de Janasz S. Perceptions of an organization’s culture for work and family: Do mentors make a difference? Career Development International; 2005.
  • Payne SC, Huffman AH. A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Academy of Management Journal. 2005 Feb; 48(1):158–68.
  • Tonidandel S, Avery DR, Phillips MG. Maximizing returns on mentoring: Factors affecting subsequent protege performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2006 Sep; 28(1):89–110.
  • Kram KE. Mentoring at work. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1985.
  • Whitely W, Dougherty TW, Dreher GF. Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers and professionals early career progress. Academy of Management Journal. 1991 Jun; 34(2):331–51.
  • Finkelstein LM, Allen TD, Rhoton LA. An examination of the role of age in mentoring relationships. Group and Organization Management. 2003 Jun; 28(2):249–81.
  • Hezlett SA, Gibson SK. Linking mentoring and social capital: Implications for career and organization development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2007 Aug; 9(3):384–412.
  • Fagenson EA. Mentoring-who needs it? A comparison of proteges’ and nonproteges’ need for power, achievement, affiliation and autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1992; 41(1):48–60.
  • Ragins BR, Scandura TA. Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal. 1994 Aug; 37(4):957–71.
  • Scandura TA, Ragins BR. The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1993 Dec; 43(3):251–65.
  • Hunt DM, Michael C. Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of Management Review. 1983 Jul; 8(3):475–85.
  • Olian JD, Carroll SJ, Giannantonio CM. Mentor reactions to proteges: An experiment with managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1993 Dec; 43(3):266–78.
  • Turban D, Dougherty T. Role of protege personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal. 1994; 37(3):688–702.
  • Whitely W, Dougherty TW, Dreher GF. Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers and professionals early career progress. Academy of Management Journal. 1991 Jun; 34:331–51.
  • Whitely W, Coetsier P. The relationship of career mentoring to early career outcomes. Organization Studies. 1993 May; 14(3):419–41.
  • LaFleur AK, White BJ. Appreciating mentorship: The benefits of being a mentor. Professional Case Management. 2010 Nov–Dec; 15(6):305–11.
  • Seepersad R, Bailey-Watson M. Mentor in the third age: A learning perspective; 2013 Mar.
  • Kram KE. Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman; 1985 Sep.
  • Fagenson–Eland EA, Marks MA, Amendola KL. Perceptions of mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1997 Aug; 51(1):29–42.
  • Allen TD, Poteet ML, Burroughs SM. The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1997 Aug; 51(1):70–89.
  • Allen TD, Poteet ML, Russell JEA, Dobbins GH. A field study of factors related to supervisors willingness to mentor others. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1997 Feb; 50(1):1– 22.
  • Allen TD, Poteet ML, Russell JEA. Protege selection by mentors: What makes the difference? Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2000 May; 21(3):271–82.
  • Aryee S, Chay YW, Chew J. The motivation to mentor among managerial employees. Group and Organization Management. 1996 Sep; 21(3):261–77.
  • Burke RJ, McKeen CA, McKenna C. Correlates of mentoring in organizations: The mentor’s perspective. Psychological Reports. 1993 May; 72(3):883–96.
  • Ragins BR, Cotton JL. Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations. Journal of Management. 1993 Feb; 19(1):97– 111.
  • Ragins BR, Scandura TA. Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1999 Jul; 20(4):493–509.
  • Lander J. The gift of mentoring. Clinical Nursing Research. 2004 Aug; 13(3):175–8.
  • Klauss R. Formalized mentor relationships for management and development programs in federal government. Public Administration Review. 1981 Jul-Aug; 41(4):489–96.
  • Hayden J. Mentoring: Help with climbing the career ladder. Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul; 7(3):289–92.
  • Ncube LB, Wasburn MH. Strategic collaboration for ethical leadership: A mentoring framework for business and organizational decision making. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. 2006 Jan; 13(1):1–6.
  • Stevens-Roseman ES. Older mentors for newer workers: Impact of a worker-driven intervention on later life satisfaction. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health. 2009 Dec; 24(4):419–26.
  • Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. P. B. Baltes and M. M. Baltes (Eds). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 1–34.
  • Maddox GL. Aging differently. The Gerontologist. 1987; 27(5):557–64.
  • Robson SM, Hansson RO, Abalos A, Booth M. Successful aging: Criteria for aging well in the workplace. Journal of Career Development. 2006 Dec; 33(2):156–77.
  • Capowski G. Ageism: The new diversity issue. Management Review. 1994 Oct; 83(10):10–5.
  • Warr T. Age and employment. H. C. Triandis, Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists. 1994; 4:485–550.
  • Henwood T, Bartlett H, Carroll M. Mentoring Australian emerging researchers in aging: Evaluation of a pilot mentoring scheme. Educational Gerontology. 2011 Jul; 37(8):703–14.
  • Finkelstein LM, Burke MJ, Raju NS. Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology.1995 Dec; 80(6):652–63.
  • Perry EL, Finkelstein LM. Toward a broader view of age discrimination in employment-related decisions: A joint consideration of organizational factors and cognitive processes. Human Resource Management Review. 1999 Dec; 9(1):21–49.
  • Kram KE. Phases of the mentoring relationship. Academy of Management Journal. 1983 Dec; 26(4):608–25.
  • Choi KM, Lee CS, Hwang YK. The structural relationship among self-efficacy, social networks, adaptation to Korean Society and hope among foreign workers. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Apr; 8(S7):488–93.
  • Jayachandran M, Manikandan. Techniques of communication. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2007 Dec; 1(2):1–3.
  • Zarghami E, Olfat M. Investigation of the relationship between ease of access to educational facilities in the elderly participation rate in education and life expectancy. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2015 Jun; 8(11):1–13.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.