Total views : 337
Quantifying Resilience in the Personality of Millennial leaders
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to assay the resilience in Millennial leader’s personality by preparing a survey instrument which would be useful to organizations to measure the leadership skills, personality traits and their resilience (flexibility). The desideratum is to examine whether this variance poses as threat to today’s workforce. Methodology: The empirical results are presented and a new scale is developed to assay resilience in the personality of Millennial leaders, which includes different stages of descriptive research. Expert opinion was performed among 62 specialists, Exquisite surveys were conducted with 92 Gen Y leaders and final data assimilation was done from 525 Millennial leaders in the I.T industry using stratified proportionate random sampling. Findings: The final results of this study led to the development of a standardized 30-iteminstrument, augmented by construct validity and scale’s reliability. Thus, it can be avouched that it possible to quantify resilience of Millennial leaders; and the personality traits of Millennial leaders explain for a substantial amount of variance (18.1%) in their resilience behavior. Further, Extraverted Millennial leaders agreed that their tendency to be flexible/resilient depends on their personality traits; and they sought to take chances in variating personalities. This posed as a threat to their work profiles, where Gen Y leaders still preferred to pursue this variating resilience in their personality. Therefore, it can be acknowledged that the variation in the resilience of Millennial leader’s personality certainly poses as impendence to the organizations. Applications/Improvements: Even though there are several works published around the personalities of millennials, this paper builds upon the authors’ motive to explore about the flexibility in personality of Gen Y leaders in organizations.
Gen Y leaders, Personality, Resilience, Flexibility, Behavior
- Marston C. Myths about Millennials: Tips for about retaining Millennials. http://humanresources.about. com/od/managementtips/a/millennial_myth.htm. Date accessed: 11/05/2016.
- King N, Kruger N, Pretorius J. Knowledge management in a multicultural environment: a South African perspective. In: Aslib Proceedings. 2007; 59(3):285−99.
- Zemke R, Raines C, Filipczak B. Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. American Management Association: New York, NY, 2000, 11p.
- Dyer JG, McGuinness TM. Resilience: Analysis of the concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 1996; 10(5):276–82.
- Richardson GE. The meta-theory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2002; 58(3):307–21.
- Khaleelee O, Woolf R. Personality, life experience and leadership capability. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 1996; 17(6): 5−11.
- Pasieka SA. Exploring the Changing Workforce: Understanding and Managing the Generation of Millennial Workers, ProQuest Information and Learning. 2011, 108p. . 8. Khaleelee O, Woolf R. Personality, life experience and leadership capability. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 1996; 17(6):5−11.
- Bargavi N, Samuel AA, Paul J D. Personality-Related Leadership Effects of Millennials in 21st Century Organizations. European Journal of Scientific Research. 2015; 131(4):438−46.
- Chan DSH. Relationship between generation propensive leadership behaviors and job satisfaction of generation X and generation Y professionals. University of Phoenix: USA, 2005.
- NASSCOM Quarterly Industry Review-June 2015. http:// www.nasscom.in/quarterly-industry-reviewjune-2015. Date accessed: 11/06/2015.
- Chennai. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chennai. Date accessed: 19/05/2016.
- India IT-BPM Exports. http://www.nasscom.in/indiaitbpmexports. Date accessed: 04/05/2015.
- Arsenault PM. Validating generational differences. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2004; 25(2):124–41.
- Smith JW, Clark G. New Games, Different Rules Millennials Are In Town. Journal of Diversity Management; Third Quarter, 2010; 5(3):1−12.16. Sjöberg L. Distal factors in risk perception. Journal of Risk Research. 2003; 6(3):187–11.
- VanMeter RA, Grisaffe DB, Chonko LB, Roberts JA. Generation Y’s ethical ideology and its potential workplace implications. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013; 117(1):93–109.
- Campbell KA. Can Effective Risk Management Signal Virtue-Based Leadership?”, Journal of Business Ethics.2014; 129(1):115−30.
- Dulin L., Leadership preferences of a Generation Y cohort: A mixed method investigation. Journal of Leadership Studies. 2008; 2(1):43−59.
- Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008; 6(1):53−60.
- Thompson A, Gaudreau P. From optimism and pessimism to coping: The mediating role of academic motivation. International Journal of Stress Management. 2008; 15(3):269−88.
- Hu L T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; 6(1):1−55.
- Leisha DeHart-Davis. The Unbureaucratic Personality. Public Administration Review. 2007; 67(5):892–903.
- Chandani A, Mehta M, Mall A, Khokhar V. Employee Engagement: A Review Paper on Factors Affecting Employee Engagement. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 9(15):1−7.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.