Total views : 276

Performance Assessment and Comparisons of Single and Group Mobility in Manet


  • Bharath University, No. 173 Agharam Road Selaiyur, Chennai - 600 073, Tamil Nadu, India


Objectivities: This paper analyzes the complete performance of institution freedom with single node range of motion method. Check mattress in this assessment is generally based upon community Simulator 2 (NS-2) environment. Methods/Analysis: Ability to move of nodes is an essential issue in mobile adhoc sites (MANET). Nodes in MANET move around in one network to one other for my part and within the condition of organization. In unmarried client mobility scheme each client performs registration for my own part in new MANET whereas in institution range of motion scheme best one client in a set just like group consultant (GR) functions registration with respect to all the nodes in the group and can be given Health care of address (COA). Internet process (IP) of most other nodes in the group continues to be identical and then your performance examination and reviews of one and group mobility in is reviewed. Finding: Our simulated outcomes demonstrate that group range of motion plan reduces selection of emails and uses significantly less time for subscription of nodes when compared with single node ability to move plan. Consequently community load is reduced in institution range of motion scheme. Novelty/Improvement: The tested end result suggests that group mobility scheme no much longer simplest reduces the selection of messages; in addition, it minimizes the community fill and time for sign up of nodes.


Mobile Adhoc network, Group Registration, Group Representative, Care of Address, Mobility.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 210)


  • Breed.: Wireless Ad hoc Networks Basic Concepts. High Frequency Electronics. 2007; p. 44–47.
  • Burg A. Ad hoc Network Specific Attacks, Seminar Ad hoc Networking Concepts. Applications and Security. 2003; p. 1–12.
  • Anonymous: Mobility and Mobile IP Introduction, White paper, Doc no. IPU-000 Rev C Ipunplugged. 2003; p. 1–17.
  • Tseng Y, Shen C, Chen W.: Integrating Mobile IP with Ad hoc Networks. In IEEE Computer. 2003; p. 48–55.
  • Irshad E, Noshairwain W, Usman M, Irshad A, Gilani M. Germany: WWW/Internet, IADIS: Group Mobility in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. 2008 Oct; p. 13–15.
  • Kock, Schmidt J. Dynamic Mobile IP Routers in Adhoc Networks. OULU, Finland: International Workshop on Wireless Ad hoc Networks (IWWAN). 2004; p. 13–134.
  • Zhao J, Wang L, Kim Y, Jiang Y, Yang X. Secure Dynamic Gateway to Internet Connectivity for Ad hoc networks. NIST. 1989; p. 305–19.
  • Tseng Y, Shen C, Chen W. Mobile IP and Ad hoc Networks: An Integration and Implementation Experience. IEEE Computer. 2003; 36(5):48–55.
  • Corson, Macker J, Cirincione G. Internet Based Mobile Ad hoc Networking. IEEE Internet Computing. 1999; p. 63–70.
  • Farooq J. Mobility and Internet connectivity in mobile ad hoc networks (internet). 2004; p. 1–6.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.