Total views : 5589

Fuzzy Concept Lattice for Ontology Learning and Concept Classification

Affiliations

  • Sathyabama University, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600119, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sri Lakshiammal Engineering College, Chennai - 600126, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Objective: To discover the the new latent concept, which is significant to self-learning and machine learning. To better understand the conceptual relations of the query terms. Methods: The application of Fuzzy Formal Concept to construct a Concept Lattice that better describes the semantic relations of incoming patterns for a collection of documents. There has been little work that evaluates the effect of various techniques and parameter settings in the word space construction from corpora. Findings: The present paper experimentally investigates how the choice of a particular domain helps the user to discover the information which is much closer to his preferences. Applications/Improvements: The results generated using our novel approach has been experimented for the context of finding the Sea side Schools based on user requirements. A comparision of related papers is performed to encounter the challenging issues of Ontology construction for text classification in Semantic Web.

Keywords

Fuzzy Formal Concept Lattice, Machine Learning, Ontology, Semantic Web, Web Text Analysis.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 336)

References


  • Gruber RT. Towards principles for the design of ontology’s used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 1995; 43(1):907–28.
  • Selvi K, Suresh RM. Measure semantic similarity between words using fuzzy formal concept analysis. Proceedings of IRNet; India. 2012. P. 31–4.
  • Selvi K, Suresh RM. An efficient technique to implement similarity measures in text document clustering using artificial neural networks algorithm. Research Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and Technology. 2014; 8(23):2320–28.
  • Noy N, McGuinness DL. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report; Stanford. 2001.
  • Li YH, Jain AK. Classification of text documents. The Computer Journal. 1998; 41(8):537–46.
  • Revathy S, Parvaathavarthini B, Rajathi S. Futuristic validation method for rough fuzzy clustering. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Jan; 8(2):120–7.
  • Rao TVN, Govardhan A. Efficient segmentation and classification of mammogram images with fuzzy filtering. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Jul; 8(15):1–8.
  • Ramana AV, Reddy EK. OCCSR: Document classification by order of context, concept and semantic relations. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Nov; 8(30):1–8.
  • Moreno A, Sanchez D. Learning medical ontologies from the Web. Knowledge management for Health care procedures. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 32–45.
  • Stumme G, Taouil R, Bastide Y, et al. Conceptual clustering with iceberg concept lattices. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 2002; 42(2):189–222.
  • Miller GA. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM. 1995; 38(11):39–41.
  • Philip R. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. Proceedings of IJCAI’95; 1995. p. 448–453.
  • Bollegala D, Matsuo Y, Ishizuka M. Measuring semantic similarity between implicit semantic relations. ACM Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference Committee; 2009. 978-1-60558-487.
  • Chan CW. From knowledge modeling to ontology construction. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (IJSEKE). 2004; 14(6).
  • Cui G, Lu Q, Li W, Chen Y. Corpus Exploitation from Wikipedia for Ontology Construction. p. 2125–32.
  • Chou C-H, Zahedi F, Zhoa H. Ontology for developing websites for natural disaster management: Methodology and implementation; 2008.
  • Selvi K, Suresh RM. Document clustering using artificial neural networks. National Journal on Advances in Computing and Management. 2008; 5(1):1–5.
  • Rinaldi AM. An ontology-driven approach for semantic information retrieval on the web. In ACM Transactions on Internet Technologies. 2009; 9(10).
  • Binfeng X, Xiaogang L, Cenglin P, Qian H. Based on ontology: Construction and application of medical knowledge base. IEEE International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering; 2007. p. 586–9.
  • Swartout B, Patil R, Knight K, Russ T. Toward distributed use of large-scale ontologies. AAAI Technical Report; 2007. SS-97-06.
  • Yang BR, Zheng DQ, Yang J, Liu L, Jia MY, Sun WC. Automatic ontology construction approaches and its applications on military intelligence. Proceedings of Asia Pacific Conference on Information Processing; 2009. p. 348–51.
  • Khan L, Luo F. Ontology construction for information selection. Proceedings of 14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence; Washington. 2002. p. 122–7.
  • Kietz JU, Maedche A, Volz R. A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. Proceedings of the EKAW’2000 Workshop on Ontology’s and Texts; France. 2000.
  • Sampath S, Murugan S. Similarity measure using fuzzy formal concept for any context. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science. 2013; 12(3):607–13.
  • Bendaoud R, Mohamed RH, Yannick G. Text-based ontology construction using relational concept. Analysis Workshop on Ontology Dynamics-IWOD 2007; France. 2007.
  • Cimiano P, et al. Learning concept hierarchies from text corpa using fuzzy concept. Analysis Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2005; 24(1):205–339.
  • Shey H, Kindervag J. Rethinking data discovery and data classification. Strategic plan. The Data Security and privacy playback. USA: Forrester Research Inc; 2014.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.