Total views : 167

Correlation between Strategies used in Virtual Self- Presentations and Language Speaker Gender

Affiliations

  • Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Kemerovo Branch, Russian Federation

Abstract


Objectives: The research focuses on strategies and tactics by using which the Internet users (both men and women) of online dating sites create free-text (without multiple choice option) self-presentations unlike the part of the profiles with multiple choice options. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The authors of the research differentiate the notions “communication strategy” / “speech strategy” and “communication tactics” / “speech tactics” and analyze the data from these perspectives. The data for the study are the virtual self-presentations made up by Russian and English-speaking men and women aged 18 to 60. The fragment of self-presentation in which a definite strategy or tactics is verbalized is used as a unit of analysis. The data are analyzed by the following methods: descriptive, comparative and quantitative. Findings: The key findings of the research are as follows: a typical author of a self-presentation in online dating sites based on their age as well as the number of lexical units used in a free-text self-presentation was defined; the basic communication strategy was formulated; five universal speech strategies: “Self-characterization”, “Addressee’s characterization”, “Purpose of searching”, “Representing an ideal situation”, “Orientation to communication”, which are verbalized in self-presentations of both Russian- and English-speaking men and women in online dating sites were identified. Each speech strategy has a certain set of communication and speech tactics described by the authors of the article. The speech strategies “Selfcharacterization” and “Addressee’s characterization” are the strategies that have more gender differences observed at the speech tactics level. The researchers conclude that there are no fundamental gender differences in choosing men’s or women’s specific speech strategies and communication tactics for both Russian- and English-speaking users. The gender differences reveal in the choice of speech tactics. Application/ Improvement: The present study develops the theory of strategic and tactical planning of speech through the analysis of its gender markedness. The authors define the set of universal and gender marked strategies and tactics used by male and female profilers of informal online self-presentations.

Keywords

Gender, Online Dating Sites, Self-Presentation, Strategy, Tactics.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 145)

References


  • Goroshko E. Gender studies in linguistics In: Introduction to gender studies. In 2 parts. Kharkov: Centre for Gender Studies; St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. 2001; 508–42.
  • Lakoff R. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
  • Uldanai MB, Natalia LS, Olga AV. Speech Image in the System of Social Relations: About Certain Stages of Linguistic Image-making (as exemplified by Margaret Thatcher’s Oral Activity). Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Mar; 9(12):1–14.
  • Kim Y, Han S. Effects of Facebook Fan Page Users’ Social Capital Needs, Innovativeness and Self-Presentation Needs on Interactive Behavior: Brand Identification as a Moderator Variable. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Jul; 9(26):1–6.
  • Luchinsky Y, Luchinskaya Y, Patyukova R, Khoutyz I, Olomskaya N. Correlation of the Concepts of Public Communication and PR-Discourse in the Mass Media Space. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Jul; 9(27):1–7.
  • Yoon S, Kim S, Kim J, You Y. A study on the Impact of Consultants’ Nonverbal Communication on Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Long-term Relationship Orientation of the Client Firm. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Jul; 9(26):1–8.
  • Blumer H. Human nature and collective behaviour. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Books, 1973.
  • Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life.London: Penguin, 1990.
  • Cooley C. Sociological theory and social research. New York: H. Holt. 2d ed., Augustus M. Kelley, 1969.
  • Ellison N, Heino R, Gibbs J. Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006; 11(2):415–41.
  • Gorny E. The Virtual Self: Self-presentation and self-knowledge on the Internet. Available from: http://www.zhurnal.ru/staff/gorny/english/self/index.html. Date accessed: 17/05/2016.
  • Klyuev E. Speech communication. Moscow: Ripol Klassik, 2002.
  • Kirillova N. Communication strategies and tactics form a perspective of moral categories. Bulletin of R. Е. Alekseev Nizhniy Novgorod State Technical University. Management in Social Systems. Communication Technologies. 2012; 1:26–33.
  • Kopnina G. Speech manipulation. Moscow: Flinta, 2008.
  • Zherebilo T. Dictionary of linguistic terms. 5th ed. Nazran: Piligrim, 2010.
  • Labov W. Variation in language. In: Reed C editor. The Learning of language. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. 1971; 187–221.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.