Total views : 211

Innovations on Bayesian Approaches of Software Cost Estimation Model


  • CSE Department, K. L. University, Guntur - 522502, Andhra Pradesh, India


Objectives: To find Large Software Products Cost Estimation Model by using Bayesian Approaches. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Composite strategy for building programming models in view of a blend of information and master judgment is tried here. This system depends on the surely knew and generally acknowledged Bayes’ hypothesis that has been effectively connected in other building areas incorporating to some degree in the product unwavering quality designing space. Be that as it may, the Bayesian methodology has not been viably misused for building more powerful programming estimation models that utilization a change adjusted blend of undertaking information and master judgment. The center of this paper is to demonstrate the change in precision of the cost estimation model when the Bayesian methodology is utilized versus the numerous relapse approach. Findings: We employed Bayesian model aligned utilizing a dataset of 100 datapoints approved on a dataset of 200 datapoints (sample data), it yields an expectation exactness of PRED(.30) = 76% (i.e., 106 or 76% of the 200 datapoints are evaluated inside 29.5% of the actuals). The immaculate relapse based model aligned utilizing 100 datapoints when accepted on the same 200 task dataset yields a poorer precision of PRED(.30) = 53.4%. Application/Improvements: This Paper Very Advanced Approach for Large Industrial Software Products.


Baysian Methodology, Data Analysis, Numerous Relapse Approach, Post Data, Software Cost Estimation Model.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 197)


  • Molani M, Jafarian AJ. A new approach to software project cost estimation using a hybrid model of radial basis function neural network and genetic algorithm. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2014 Jan; 7(6):1–6.
  • Hamid A, Madnick S. Software project dynamics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1991.
  • Bailey. A meta-model for software development resources expenditures. 5th International Conference on Software Engineering; 1981. p. 107–16.
  • Banker, Kauffman R, Kumar R. An empirical test of object-based output measurement metrics in a Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE) environment. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1991; 8(3):127–50.
  • Banker, Chang H, Kemerer CF. Evidence on economies of scale in software development. Information and Software Technology. IEEE; 1994. p. 275–82.
  • Bazzana P, Caliman P, Gandini, et al. Software management by metrics: Practical experiences in Italy. G. Software Quality Assurance and Measurement. London: International Computer Press; 1995. p. 185–94.
  • Boehm. Software engineering economics. Prentice-Hall; 1981.
  • Boehm B, Clark B, Horowitz C, Westland R, Madachy R, Selby R. Cost models for future software life cycle processes. COCOMO 2.0 Annals of Software Engineering Special Volume on Software Process and Product Measurement; 1995. p. 1–31.
  • Briand, Briand LC, Basili VR, Thomas WM. A pattern recognition approach for software engineering data analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 1992 Nov; 18(11):931–42.
  • Box. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Addison Wesley; 1973.
  • Chidamber S, Kemerer C. A metrics suite for object oriented design. Shyam CISR WP No. 249 and Sloan WP No. 3524-93. Center for Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1994. p. 1–50.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.