Total views : 293

A Study on Mediating Effects of Outcome Expectancy on Relationships among Perceived Caring Climate, Task Engagement and Task Persistence in Physical Education


  • Department of Physical Education, Korea National University of Education, Korea, Republic of
  • Division of Sports and Well-Being, Hanyang University, Korea, Republic of


Background/Objectives: The purpose is to identify the mediating effects of outcome expectancy on the relationships among the caring climate perceived by students, their task engagement and task persistence in physical education. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Participants were 343 students at four middle schools in metropolitan areas. The goodness of fit of the entire model was verified through SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 and the hypotheses were tested. Findings: First, the caring climate involved a positive prediction of the outcome expectancy. The caring climate had positive effects on the task engagement and task persistence of students. Second, outcome expectancy in physical education class has positive effects on task engagement and task persistence; those are active class participation behaviors. Third, the outcome expectancy in a physical education class had mediating effects on the relationship among the caring climate perceived by students, their task engagement and task persistence. Findings concluded that a caring climate should be established for the students and their positive expectancy can lead to active participation. Applications/Improvements: Physical education teachers should establish a student-centered class climate to provide high quality education. Also, they should select proper tasks and adjust the level of difficulty to live up to the student expectancy


Caring Climate, Outcome Expectancy, Physical Education, Task Engagement, Task Persistence

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 276)


  • Pihu M, Hein V, Koka A, Hagger MS. How students’ perceptions of teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors affect physical activity behavior: An application of the trans-contextual model. European Journal of Sport Science. 2008; 8(4):193–204.
  • Hassandra M, Goudas M, Chroni S. Examining factors associated with intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2003; 4(1):211–23.
  • Song KH, Kim SY. A study on structural relationships between, learning environment perceived in the PE class, outcome expectancy and task-solving behavior. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2015; 54(5):389–98.
  • Larson A. Student perception of caring teaching in physical education. Sport, Education and Society. 2006; 33:337–52.
  • Shim YS. Mediational role of intrinsic motivation between perceived caring climate and students’ satisfaction, enjoyment and attitudes toward physical education class. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2013; 24(2):75–87.
  • Hellison D. Teaching responsibility through physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2003. p. 104.
  • Rhodes JE. The critical ingredient: Caring youth-staff relationships in after-school settings. New Directions for Youth Development. 2004; 101:145–61.
  • Newton M, Watson DL, Gano-Overway L, Fry M, Kim M, Magyar M. The role of a caring-based intervention in a physical activity setting. The Urban Review. 2007; 39(3):281–99.
  • Eccles JS, Gootman JA. Community programs to promote youth development. Committee on community-levels programs for youth. Board on children, youth and families, commission on behavioral and social sciences and education, national research council and institute of medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
  • Watson D, Newton M, Kim M. Recognition values-based constructs in a summer physical activity program. The Urban Review. 2003; 35(3):217–32.
  • Brown TC, Fry M. Perceptions of caring and positive in exercise classes. Paper presented at the Meeting of American Alliance for Health Physical Education Recreation and Dance; 2009.
  • Park JG, Lee KH. Middle school students’ attitude toward physical education, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in coeducational and same-sex classes. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2011; 50(6):183–95.
  • Bernstein E, Phillips SR, Silverman S. Attitudes and perceptions of middle school students toward competitive activities in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2011; 30(1):69–83.
  • Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational belief, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology. 2002; 53:109–32.
  • Eccles JS, Harold RD. Gender differences sport involvement: Applying the Eccles’ expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1991; 3(1):7–35.
  • Fredricks JA, Eccles JS. Family socialization, gender, and sport motivation and involvement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2005; 27(5):3–31.
  • Rodgers WM, Brawley LR. The role of outcome expectations in participation motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1991; 13(1):411–27.
  • Mannell RC. High-investment activity and life satisfaction among older adults: Committed serious leisure and flow activities. Newbury Park; 1993. p. 1–13.
  • Rothschild ML. Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future direction. Proceedings of Advances in Consumer Research. 1984; 11(1):216–7.
  • Rellinger E, Borkowski JG, Turner LA, Hale CA. Perceived task difficulty and intelligence: Determinants of strategy use and recall. Intelligence. 1995; 20(1):125–43.
  • Linnenbrink EA, Pintrich PR. Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review. 2002; 31(3):313–27.
  • Kim SY. A study on structural relationship between behavioral activation/inhibition, task engagement and task persistence in high school physical education class. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2015; 54(3):243–52.
  • Park JG. Examining the structural model between perceived motivational climates, intrinsic motivation, and physical activity intention in physical education. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2009; 48(2):123–36.
  • Cho HS. The effect of teachers’ autonomy support environment in physical education on students’ help-seeking behaviors and class participation attitude. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2011; 50(6):273–84.
  • Shim YS. Validation of the Korean version of perceived caring climate scale and its influence on elementary school students’ attitudes toward physical education class. The Korean Journal of Elementary Physical Education. 2012; 18(3):133–42.
  • Gao Z. Understanding student’s motivation in physical education: Integration of expectancy-value model and selfefficacy. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2007.
  • Gao Z. Student’s motivation, engagement, satisfaction and cardiorespiratory fitness in physical education. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2009; 21(1):101–15.
  • Park JG. The relationships between values, outcome expectancy, engagement and academic achievement in physical education: The moderating effect of perceived task difficulty and mediating effect of self-efficacy. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2011; 51(2):189–201.
  • Guan J, Xiang P, McBride R, Bruene A. Achievement goals, social goals and students’ persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2006; 25(1):58–74.
  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988; 103(2):411–23.
  • Hong SH. The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2000; 19(1):161–77.
  • Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010; 37(2):197–206.
  • Holmbeck G. Toward terminological, conceptual and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1997; 65(4):599–610.
  • Horn TS, Amorose AJ. Sources of competence information. Advance in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown, Wv: Fitness Information Technology; 2002. p. 49–63.
  • Horn TS, Weiss MR. A developmental analysis of children’s self-ability judgments in the physical domain. Pediatric Exercise Science. 1991; 3(1):310–26.
  • Lyu MJ. Validation of Korean Version of Physical Education Learning Environment Scale (KPELES) in middle school. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2013; 52(4):189– 99.
  • Marchand G, Skinner EA. Motivational dynamics of children’s academic help-seeking and concealment. Journal of Education Psychology. 2007; 99(1):65–82.
  • Wigfield A, Eccles JS. Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000; 25:68–81.
  • Park JG, Yoo J. Determinants of task persistence in physical education classes: Examining a social cognitive model of motivation and emotion. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2012; 23(4):21–40.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
  • Li W, Wright PM, Rukavina PB, Pickering M. Measuring students’ perceptions of personal and social responsibility and the relationship to intrinsic motivation in urban physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2008; 27(2):167–78.
  • Treasure DC. Enhancing young people’s motivation in youth sport: An achievement goal approach. Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. G. Roberts editor. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2001. p. 79–100.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.