Total views : 742

Mobile Phone Impact on Agriculture and Price Information among Farmers


  • School of Journalism and Communication, Tsinghua University, Beijing - 100084, China


Objectives: The objective of this research is to study on the awareness regarding behaviour intention and effect of mobile phone for agriculture, marketing and weather information among farmers in Sindh, Pakistan. Method: The quantitative method was applied and data was collected from 1500 farmers from ten districts of Sindh, Pakistan. The total 150 respondents were randomly selected from each district for data collection. Findings: The result indicated that more than 97% of the farmers have their own mobile phones while 23.3% of the respondents use internet on their mobile phone to get different information. Information and communication technologies have improved the life of common men and different sectors of society are getting more benefit from it. Farmers are one of the backward communities in underdeveloped nations and most of the farmers are unaware about technologies in the development of the agriculture. The study showed that farmers did not properly use mobile phone for connected market and call buyers to sell their produce in good price while majority of the farmers did not have contact numbers of agriculture officers as well as meteorological department to get latest information of weather. Moreover, farmers did not discuss agriculture issues and problems with agriculture officers. However, majority of the farmers were significantly agree to use mobile phone in future for agriculture information. Improvements: Now there is a need that government should provide more facilities to farmers and create awareness on agriculture development in Sindh, Pakistan through mobile phone usage.


Agriculture Mobile Phone Marketing and Price Information.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 455)


  • Duncombe R. Researching impact of mobile phones for development: concepts, methods and lessons for practice. Information Technology for Development. 2011; 17(4):268-88.
  • Singh K. Role of information and communication technology (ICT) for agricultural development in Western Odisha. International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts. 2016; 2(1).
  • McNamara K. Improving agricultural productivity and markets: The role of information and communication technologies. 2009.
  • Usluel YK, Askar P, Bas T. A Structural Equation Model for ICT Usage in Higher Education. Educational Technology & Society. 2008; 11(2):262-73.
  • Lawal-Adebowale OA, Akeredolu-Ale BI. Agricultural workers’ perception of information and communication technology usage for agricultural development in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Social Development in Africa. 2010; 25(2):5 10.
  • Crandall A. Kenya: Kenyan Farmers’ Use of Cell Phones: Calling preferred over SMS, M4d. 2012; p. 119-29.
  • Jain L, Kumar H, Singla RK. Assessing mobile technology usage for knowledge dissemination among farmers in Punjab. Information Technology for Development. 2015; 21(4):668-76.
  • Haruna SK, Jamilu AA, Abdullahi AY, Murtala GB. Ownership and Use of Mobile Phone Among Farmers in North Senatorial Zone of Kaduna State. Journal of Agricultural Extension. 2014; 17(2):47-54.
  • Sanchez-bender M. More than one million poor Peruvian farmers to gain access to improved technologies. The World Bank News. 2013; p. 1–2.
  • Zhang Y, Wang L, Duan Y. Agricultural Information Dissemination using ICTs: A Review and Analysis of Information Dissemination Models in China. Information Processing in Agriculture. 2016; 3(1):17-29.
  • Yuen AHK, Law N, Wong KC. ICT implementation and school leadership: Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration. 2003; 41(2):158-70.
  • Anjum R. Design of mobile phone services to support farmers in developing countries. Computer Science. 2015; p. 1-72.
  • Tofik I. (The use of mobile phone in camel marketing: The case of Babille district of Fafan zone Somali region Ethiopia. 2014.
  • Silva DH, Ratnadiwakara D, Zainudeen A. Social influence in mobile phone adoption: Evidence from the bottom of pyramid in emerging Asia. Available at SSRN 1564091. 2011; p. 1-18.
  • Shimamoto D, Yamada H, Gummert M. Mobile phones and market information: Evidence from rural Cambodia. Food Policy. 2015; 57:135-41.
  • Vandamme E, Haese EM, Speelman S, Haese DL. Livestock against risk and vulnerability: Multi functionality of livestock keeping in Burundi. The role of livestock in developing countries: enhancing multifunctionality. 2010; p. 1-226.
  • Malathi ACJ. Electromagnetic Radiation Hazards on Humans Due to Mobile Phones. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 May; 9(20):1-7.
  • Saini BS, Kaur N, Bhatia KS. Keystroke Dynamics for Mobile Phones: A Survey. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Feb; 9(6):1-8.
  • Nagini S, Rajinikanth TV, Kiranmayee BV. Agriculture Yield Analysis using Som Classifier Algorithm along with Enhanced Preprocessing Techniques. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Jul; 9(27):1-6.
  • Shetty P, Manorama K, Murugan M, Hiremath MB. Innovations that Shaped Indian Agriculture-then and Now. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2014 Jan; 7(8):1-7.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.