Total views : 159
Finite Element Analysis of Normal Tibiofemoral Joint and Knee Osteoarthritis: a Comparison Study Validated Through Geometrical Measurements
Objectives: A comparison study of normal tibiofemoral joint and knee osteoarthritis is done to analyse the displacement, stress and strain values. Statistical Analysis: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a general type of arthritis in which there is a gradual loss of cartilage from the joints. Global Burden of Disease 2000 estimated that about 10% of the world’s population who are greater than 60 years of age have symptomatic issues that can be attributed to OA. The COPCORD investigations in India for the year 2011 concluded that the rough occurrence of clinically diagnosed knee OA was greater in the urban (5.5%) than the rustic group of people (3.3%). Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is thought to be an inexorably essential instrument for in vivo investigations of musculoskeletal biomechanics. Magnetic resonance images were obtained for two subjects in the age group of 40-45 years. Three dimensional models of a normal and OA knee joint are obtained using Mimics Research software 17 and FEA is done using ANSYS 14 software to determine displacement, stress and strain values. Findings: Finite Element models are powerful tools to foresee the impacts of various parameters required in knee agony and joint degradation and to give data generally hard to acquire from analyses. The 3D model of normal and OA knee joint further helps to design the prosthesis of knee for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) result includes the stresses and strains induced in the knee articular cartilages and meniscus during single-leg stance. Displacement, stress and strain values for OA knee are higher than the normal knee joint. Hooke’s law of modulus of elasticity is verified in this work. Then finite element model (FEM) is validated through geometrical measurements such as Joint space width, cartilage thickness and meniscus thickness. Improvements: This data can be combined with other analysis and modeling tools, for example, gait analysis and FE modeling to test hypotheses concerning joint function and the impacts of wounds.
Osteoarthritis, Biomechanics, Stresses, Strains, Joint Space Width, Cartilage Thickness.
- Yoo IY. SEQ-VAS and EQ-5D index by Health Status in the Community Dwelling Elders with Osteoarthritis. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Jan; 8(S1):1-6.DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/59309.
- Ahn SY, Kwon M. Factors Influencing the Experience of Pain in Depressed Patients with Osteoarthritis- Using Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 July; 9(25):1-5. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i25/97177.
- Sun-Ik C, Dong-Yeop L, Ji-Heon H, Jae-Ho Y, Jin-Seop K.Effect of Hold and Relax Technique on Knee Joint Position Awareness in Normal Adults. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Aug; 8(18):1-5. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/ v8i19/77123.
- Kazemia M, Lia LP, Savardb P, Buschmannb MD. Creep behavior of the intact and meniscectomy knee joints.Journal of The Mechanical Behaviour of Biomedical Materials. 2011; 4:1351-58.
- Aghili AL, Goudarzi AM, Paknahad A, Imani M, Mehrizi AA. Finite Element Analysis of Human Femur by Reverse Engineering Modeling Method. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 July; 8(13):1-10. DOI: 10.17485/ ijst/2015/v8i13/47884.
- Yue-Fu D, Guang-Hong H, Luo-Lian Z, Yang H, Ying-Hai D, Qing-Rong X. Accurate 3D Reconstruction of SubjectSpecific Knee Finite Element Model to Simulate the Articular Cartilage Defects. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science). 2011; 16(5):620-27.
- Yunfei G, Rongying H, Qiang X, Gaolong Z. Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue in Tibiofemoral Joint after Partial Meniscectomy of Lateral Meniscus. 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. 2011.
- Bae JY, Park KS, Seon JK, Kwak DS, Jeon I, Song EK.Biomechanical analysis of the effects of medial meniscectomy on degenerative osteoarthritis. Med. Biol. Eng.Comput. 2012; 50:53–60.
- Xu-Shu Z, Guo Yuan, Wei-Yi C. 3-D Finite Element Method Modeling and Contact Pressure Analysis of the Total Knee Joint in Flexion. Beijing: IEEE 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. 2009. DOI: 10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162138.
- Wilson WB, Rietbergen BV, Donkelaar CCV, Huiskes R.Pathways of load-induced cartilage damage causing cartilage degeneration in the knee after meniscectomy. Journal of Biomechanics. 2003; 36(6):845–51.
- Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Lynch JA, Jasani MK, Bradshaw CR. Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1995; 54(4):263-68.
- Kumara ML, Prabakaran N. Automatic detection of cartilage thickness for early detection of KOA. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2015; 10(7):3112-15.
- Kubakaddi SK, Ravikumar KM, Harini DG. Measurement of Cartilage Thickness for Early Detection of Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA). IEEE Point-of-Care Healthcare Technologies (PHT). 2013.
- Koo S, Alexander EJ, Gold GE, Giori N, Andriacchi TP.Morphology and thickness in tibial and femoral cartilage at the knee is influenced by the mechanics of walking.Sonesta Beach Resort in Key Biscayne, Florida: Summer Bioengineering Conference. 2003 June 25-29.
- Dhananjaya KVN, Murlimanju BV, Poornima V, Ullal S, Mitra P, Dinesh KVN, Saralaya VV, Prabhu LV, Prashanth KU. In vivo Morphometry of Menisci of the Knee in South Indians: A Preliminary Study. Biomed J. 2014; 37(1):14-7.
- Carey RE, Zheng L, Aiyangar AK, Harner CD, Zhang X. Subject-Specific Finite Element Modeling of the Tibiofemoral Joint Based on CT, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Stereo-Radiography Data in Vivo.Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2014; 136.
- Kang KT, Kim SH, Son J, Lee YH, Chun HJ. In Vivo Evaluation of the Subject-Specific Finite Element Model for Knee Joint Cartilage Contact Area. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing. 2015 June; 16(6):1171-77.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.