Total views : 230

Stochastic Free Vibration Analysis of RC Buildings

Affiliations

  • Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India

Abstract


Background/Objectives: Free vibration response of RC structures is random in nature due to the uncertainties exist in geometry, material properties and loading. Stochastic analysis methods can represent this randomness in responses. Methods: The Monte Carlo Simulation is a widely accepted method for stochastic structural analysis but the computational effort and cost associated with it is a limitation and hence in the present study, it is used as a method for the comparison and verification of the results obtained by other metamodel based approaches such as the response surface method. The number of analysis samples required depends on the type of approach adopted. Findings: Three different design of experiments approaches, Central Composite Design, Box Behnken Design and Full Factorial Design, where used in response surface modelling. The present study is an evaluation of these metamodel based approaches. The natural frequencies obtained by these methods of analysis were comparable with the results from Monte Carlo Simulation. However, the latter required one million analyses, making it computationally cumbersome. The Central Composite Design proved to be the most efficient method as it yielded the most accurate results even though the number of runs were marginally more than the 62 required for Box Behnken Design. Improvements: These response surface based metamodel approaches can be further applied to nonlinear stochastic analysis of structures where the cost and effort of analysis is significantly higher.

Keywords

Free Vibration, Metamodel, Monte Carlo simulation, Response Surface Method, Stochastic Analysis.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 213)

References


  • Xu J, Chen J , Li J. Probability density evolution analysis of engineering structures via cubature points. Computational Mechanics. 2012 Jul ; 50(1) :135– 56.
  • Rubinstein RY. Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York. 1981.
  • Stein M. Large Sample Properties of Simulations using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Technometrics. 1987 May ; 29(2) :143–51.
  • Ericson WA. Optimum stratified sampling using prior information. .Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965 Sep ; 65(311):750–71.
  • Chakraborty S, Mandal B, Chowdhury R , Chakrabarti A. Stochastic free vibration analysis of laminated composite plates using polynomial correlated function expansion. Composite Structures. 2016 Jan ; 135 :236–49.
  • Bucher CG, Bourgund U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Structural Safety. 1990 Jan ; 7(1) :57–66.
  • Towashiraporn P. Building seismic fragilities using response surface metamodels. Ph. D dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology. 2004 Aug . 8. Montgomery CD. Design of Experiments , John Wiley Newyork , 1976 .
  • Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1951 , 13(1) , pp. 1-45.
  • Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics. 1960 Nov ; 2(4) :1–21.
  • Rao US, Rodrigues LLR. Controlling Process Factors to Optimize Surface Quality in Drilling of GFRP Composites by Integrating DoE, ANOVA and RSM Techniques. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2015 Nov ; 8(29) :1–9.
  • Indian Standard. Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice. New Delhi Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 456:2000.
  • Dimitri V, Bljuger F, Yankelevsky D. Reliability evaluation in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Structural Safety. 1997 ; 19(2) :203–17.
  • Ozer AY. Fragility based Assessment of Low–Rise and Mid–Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings in Turkey. Ph D Thesis, Middle East Technical University. 2006 Aug.
  • Bal IE, Crowley H, Pinho R. Detail assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC buildings stock for loss assessment models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2008 Oct –Nov ; 28(10-11):914–32.
  • McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL. Nonlinear finite element analysis software architecture using object composition. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2010 Jan; 24(1):95–107.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.