Total views : 394

Method of Fraud Risk Estimating in the Audit Process

Affiliations

  • Rostov State University of Economics (RINH), Russian Federation
  • South Federal University, Russian Federation

Abstract


Background/Objectives: The article deals with methods of material misstatement risk assessment due to fraud in the process of external audit. Methods/Statistical analysis: On the basis of the fraud triangle, a theory of risk assessment algorithm has been proposed based on the expert method. Findings: The significance of risk factors has been determined with regard to their probability and an integrated assessment based on the multiplicative model has been obtained. The presented algorithm of fraud risk assessment is versatile. It can be used to assess risk of material misstatement due to fraud both at the level of the audited statements as a whole and at the level of individual statements (assumptions), as well as balances on accounts, groups of transactions and disclosures, which fully complies with all the existing performance standardization systems. Application/Improvements: The algorithm is versatile and does not require a significant investment of time and resources.

Keywords

Audit, Risk Assessment Algorithm, Fraud Triangle.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 248)

References


  • Brjukhanov MY. Financial accounting falsification risk: classification and description of factors and modelling. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. 2007; 11:30–8.
  • Vasilenko AA. Application of financial statement assertions in the process of detecting and assessing audit risk. Bulletin of the Perm University. Series: Economy. 2015; 3:145–55.
  • Kostina GV. Problems of window dressing and falsification of accounting financial statements. Actual Issues of Economic Sciences. 2012; 28:83–7.
  • Sotnikova LV. Fraudulent financial reporting: detection and prevention. Moscow: Accounting; 2011.
  • Brazel JF, Carpenter TD, Jenkins GJ. Auditors’ use of brainstorming in the consideration of fraud: Reports from the field. The Accounting Review. 2010 Jul; 85(4):1273–301.
  • Bell TB, Carcello JV. A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 2000 Mar; 19(1):169–84.
  • Mohamed YK, Khair AHA, Simon J. Fraudulent financial reporting: An application of fraud models to malaysian public listed companies. The Macrotheme Review. 2015; 4(3):126–45.
  • Albrecht WS, Albrecht CO. Fraud examination and prevention. Cengage Learning; 4 edition; 2011 Feb.
  • Hogan CE, Zabihollah R, Riley RA, Velury UK. Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 2008 Nov; 27(2):231–52.
  • Kaminski KA, Guan L. Can financial ratios detect fraudulent financial reporting? Managerial Auditing Journal. 2004; 19(1):15–28.
  • Lin JW, Hwang MI, Becker JD. A fuzzy neural network for assessing the risk of fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2003; 18(8):657–65.
  • Audit risk analysis: some statistical backgrounds [Internet]. [Cited 2002 Jan 1]. Available from: https://cris. maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/en/publications/audit-riskanalysissome-statistical-backgrounds(6171bacd-41a1-474dbad87a4065939bca).html.
  • International Standard on Auditing 240, The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements [Internet]. [Cited 2009 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf.
  • Pribytkova GV. Analysis and risk assessment of industrial enterprises in the process of investment project development. Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University; 2005.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.